Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/077,683

VEHICLE SEAT AND CUSHION FRAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Mar 19, 2024 — JP 2024-043482
Examiner
LIBBY, TROY ALAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Boshoku Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
5 granted / 5 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
25
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 5 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference characters "11B" in the majority of the figures and "13B" in figure 7 have both been used to designate the first flange. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hayashi (JP-2019073184-A). Hayashi discloses a vehicle seat with a lift mechanism. Claims 1 and 5 – Hayashi teaches a vehicle seat (figure 1) including a cushion frame (element 20 in figure 2) and a back frame (element 3 in figure 1) that form a framework of the vehicle seat, the back frame being coupled to a rear end part of the cushion frame (figure 1), the cushion frame comprising: a first side frame (element 30R in figure 2) arranged on a first end side in a seat-width direction, the first side frame extending in a seat front-rear direction (figure 2); a second side frame (element 30L in figure 2) arranged on a second end side in the seat-width direction, the second side frame extending in the seat front-rear direction (figure 2); a first coupling member (element 22 in figure 2) extending in the seat-width direction, the first coupling member coupling a front-side part of the first side frame and a front-side part of the second side frame to each other (figure 2); a second coupling member (element 23 in figure 2) extending in the seat-width direction, the second coupling member coupling a rear-side part of the first side frame and a rear-side part of the second side frame to each other (figure 2); and a reinforcing frame (element 80 in figure 2) fixed to the first side frame, the reinforcing frame reinforcing the first side frame (figure 2), wherein, in the cushion frame, when a center of the first coupling member projected onto an imaginary plane perpendicular to the seat-width direction is referred to as a first center, a center of the second coupling member projected onto the imaginary plane is referred to as a second center, and a midpoint between the first center and the second center is referred to as a center point, a front end of the reinforcing frame projected onto the imaginary plane is located frontward of the center point (figure 2), and at least part of the second coupling member projected onto the imaginary plane overlaps with the reinforcing frame projected onto the imaginary plane (figure 2). Claims 2 and 6 – Hayashi teaches the first coupling member and the second coupling member are each rotatably coupled to the first side frame and to the second side frame (“front collar 43L is rotatably assembled at the front end side of the left side frame 21L, and the rear collar 44L is rotatably assembled at the rear end side of the left side frame 21L” is explained in paragraph 21 of the Description of Embodiments section which teaches a collar at the end of elements 22 and 23 in figure 2 which provides their rotatability. Paragraph 29 describes the same functionality using collars but for the opposite side frame), wherein the vehicle seat includes a lifter device (figures 3 and 4) configured to displace a seat cushion including the cushion frame, wherein the lifter device includes: a first lifter link (element 45R in figures 3 and 4) configured to rotate integrally with the first coupling member, the first lifter link extending in a direction perpendicular to a longitudinal direction of the first coupling member (figures 3 and 4); a second lifter link (element 46R in figures 3 and 4) configured to rotate integrally with the second coupling member, the second lifter link extending in a direction perpendicular to a longitudinal direction of the second coupling member (figures 3 and 4); a sector gear (element 60 in figure 4) configured to rotate integrally with the second coupling member (figure 4); and an electric motor (element 50 in figure 3) arranged on a side opposite where the sector gear is located (figure 2), with the first side frame interposed therebetween (figure 2), the electric motor being configured to generate a driving force to rotate the sector gear, wherein, in the vehicle seat, the reinforcing frame is arranged between the first side frame and the sector gear (figure 4), and wherein the reinforcing frame is provided with a displacement restricting part (element 70 in figures 5 and 6) protruding toward the sector gear to restrict the sector gear from being displaced beyond a predetermined position (figure 6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-4 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hayashi (JP-2019073184-A) in view of Toyoshima (US-12005815-B2). Toyoshima discloses a vehicle seat with a lift mechanism. Claims 3 and 7 – Hayashi teaches the cushion frame further includes: a first flange provided on a first end part, in an up-down direction, of the first side frame, the first flange protruding from the first end part in the seat-width direction (top of element 21R in figure 7); and a second flange provided on a side opposite, in the up-down direction, where the first flange is located, the second flange protruding from said part in the seat-width direction (bottom of element 21R in figure 7), wherein, in the cushion frame, when a position where the electric motor is fixed to the first side frame is referred to as a motor fixing position, the motor fixing position projected onto an imaginary horizontal plane is located inside an outer edge of the second flange projected onto the imaginary horizontal plane (figure 7). PNG media_image1.png 440 643 media_image1.png Greyscale Image 1 Hayashi does not teach the second flange is provided on a part of the reinforcing frame. Toyoshima teach the first flange (element C in Image 1 above) is part of the first side frame (element A in Image 1 above) and the second flange (element D in Image 1 above) is provided on a part of the reinforcing frame (element B in Image 1 above). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the second flange of Hayashi protrude off of the reinforcing frame rather than protruding off of the bottom of the first side frame, as taught by Toyoshima, in order to accommodate a greater stress from the motor movement since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. Claims 4 and 8 – Hayashi does not teach the second flange protrudes in a direction opposite to a protruding direction of the first flange. Toyoshima teaches the second flange protrudes in a direction opposite to a protruding direction of the first flange (Image 1 above). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the second flange of Hayashi protrude in a direction opposite the first flange, as taught by Toyoshima, so the stiffness can be ensured effectively, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TROY A LIBBY whose telephone number is (571)272-6676. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri; 7:30 AM - 2:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID DUNN can be reached at (571) 272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.A.L./Examiner, Art Unit 3636 /DAVID R DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12686309
ARMREST FOR A VEHICLE SEAT AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12668162
SEATBACK AND VEHICLE SEAT
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660896
PIVOT SHAFT ASSEMBLY FOR A FOLDABLE DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 3 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
1y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 5 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month