Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 19/077,758

METHODS FOR SERVICE SLICE SELECTION AND SEPARATION

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Apr 01, 2016 — provisional 62/317,167 +5 more
Examiner
TRAN, VU V
Art Unit
2491
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
365 granted / 406 resolved
+31.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
423
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 406 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to application 19/077758 filed On November 07 , 2023. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claims 1-20 are pending and herein considered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-23 the following U.S. Patent No. 10.187376 in view of Innes et al. (Innes) 2014/0331297. U.S. Patent No. 11,909,730 fails to explicitly disclose: creating, by the first device, a session key for the third device; encrypting, by the first device, the session key using a symmetric key; However, in the same field of endeavor, Innes discloses a system and method for creating, by the first device, a session key for the third device; encrypting, by the first device, the session key (Innes: par. [0156] In step 952, if the signature is valid (step 950: Y), the resource/authentication server may generate and/or send a session key to the proxy device 710. In Kerberos authentication, the resource/authentication server may also send a ticket, such as a TGT or a service ticket, to the proxy device 710. The session key and/or ticket may be encapsulated using another key that the proxy device 710 and/or the client device 705 can decrypt). Giving the teaching of Innes, a person having ordinary skills in the art would have readily recognized the desirability and advantages of modifying U.S. Patent No. 11,909,730, such as disclosed by Innes, in order to improve security and prevent the unauthorized access of session key. Related Art The following prior art made of record and cited on PTO-892, but not relied upon, is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Vrzic et al. U.S. Pub. No. 2017/0142591 -Vrzic teaches managing a User Equipment (UE) attach request includes instantiating a Global Connection and Mobility Management (G-CMM) function configured to operate across a plurality of network slices in the communications network, determining an appropriate network slice from the plurality of network slices with the G-CMM function, and attaching the UE to the appropriate network slice. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU V TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1708. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 8 AM- 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ashok Patel can be reached on 571-272-3972. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU V TRAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2491
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763965
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DATA EXCHANGE ON A NETWORK TO ENHANCE SECURITY MEASURES OF THE NETWORK, VEHICLE COMPRISING SUCH SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12719657
ENCRYPTION PROCESSING DEVICE AND ENCRYPTION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706734
Automorphic Transformations of Signal Samples within a Transmitter or Receiver
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706882
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR CLOUD-BASED VIRTUAL PRIVATE SECURED CONTAINED COMMUNICATION PORTAL
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12671581
COMPUTATION ON LWE-ENCRYPTED VALUES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 406 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month