Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/077,812

PLATEN AND PRESS UNIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Mar 27, 2024 — JP 2024-050870
Examiner
FERGUSON SAMRETH, MARISSA LIANA
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
546 granted / 783 resolved
+1.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.2%
+46.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 783 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 8-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kobayashi et al. (US Publication 20220324667). With respect to claim 1, Kobayashi et al. teaches a platen (50) configured to be set on a press head (60), the press head (60) being configured to perform a pressing operation of pressing upward against a fixed plate, the platen comprising: a platen plate (56) including a placement surface (top surface of 56), the placement surface facing upward (Figures 2, 14 and 15), the placement surface (top surface of 56) being configured to have a print medium placed on the placement surface (top surface of 56, Paragraph 0042); a platen support base (61) disposed lower than the platen plate (56, Figures 14 and 15), the platen support base (61) including a support pillar (62), the support pillar (62) supporting the platen plate from below (Figures 14 and 15); and a press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) provided higher than a lowermost surface of the platen support base (61, Figures 14, 15, 26 and note 61 corresponds to 61A in Figure 26), the press surface facing downward (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26), the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) being configured for the press head (60) to come into contact with the press surface when the press head performs the pressing operation in a set state, the set state being a state in which the platen is set on the press head (Figures 16 and 17). With respect to claim 2, Kobayashi et al. teaches the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) is parallel to the placement surface (top surface of 56, Figures 14, 15). With respect to claim 3, Kobayashi et al. teaches wherein the platen support base (61) includes a tray (51), the tray (51) is disposed higher than a conveyance path of the platen, in a state of the platen being supported by the conveyance path (Paragraphs 0006, 00137), the tray (51) is configured to receive a portion, of the print medium placed on the placement surface (top surface of 56), dropping down from the placement surface (Figures 14 and 15), and the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) is provided to be higher than a lower surface of the tray (Figures 14-17). With respect to claim 4, Kobayshi et al. teaches the support pillar includes a first support pillar (62, right side) and a second support pillar (the parallel support adjacent 62, left side), and the first support pillar (62, right side) and the second support pillar (the parallel support adjacent 62, left side) are provided at positions where a center of the platen plate (Figure 16), in a width direction orthogonal to a set direction, is interposed therebetween, the set direction being a direction in which the platen is set on the press head and orthogonal to an up-down direction (Figure 16). With respect to claim 5, Kobayashi et al. teaches the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) is provided between the first support pillar and the second support pillar, in the width direction (Figures 21-26). With respect to claim 8, Kobayshi et al. teaches in a set direction in which the platen (50) is set on the press head (60), an upstream end of the support pillar (62) is disposed further upstream than an upstream end, in the set direction, of the press head, in the set state (Figure 16). With respect to claim 9, Kobayshi et al. teaches in the set state, the support pillar (62) is disposed to one side with respect to a whole of the press head (60), in a width direction orthogonal to a set direction, the set direction being a direction in which the platen is set on the press head and orthogonal to an up-down direction (Figure 16). With respect to claim 10, Kobayshi et al. teaches a block (651-653) configured to be replaceably fixed to a lower surface, of the platen plate (56), on an opposite side from the placement surface, wherein the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) is provided on the block (Figure 22). With respect to claim 11, Kobayshi et al. teaches the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) is provided integrally with a lower surface, of the platen plate (underside surface of 56), on an opposite side from the placement surface (top surface of 56). With respect to claim 12, Kobayashi et al. teaches the platen support base (61) includes a contact surface (63), the contact surface (63) is configured to contact the press head in the set state, and the contact surface is provided at a position different from the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26). With respect to claim 13, Kobayashi et al. teaches a press unit comprising: a press machine including a press head (60), the press head (60) being configured to perform a pressing operation of pressing upward with respect to a fixed plate (Figures 14-16); and a platen (50) configured to be set on a press head (60), the press head (60) being configured to perform a pressing operation of pressing upward against a fixed plate, the platen comprising: a platen plate (56) including a placement surface (top surface of 56), the placement surface facing upward (Figures 2, 14 and 15), the placement surface (top surface of 56) being configured to have a print medium placed on the placement surface (Paragraph 0042); a platen support base (61) disposed lower than the platen plate (56, Figures 14 and 15), the platen support base (61) including a support pillar (62), the support pillar (62) supporting the platen plate from below (Figures 14 and 15); and a press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) provided higher than a lowermost surface of the platen support base (61, Figures 14, 15, 26 and note 61 corresponds to 61A in Figure 26), the press surface facing downward (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26), the press surface (underside of 60 which corresponds to 631A in Figure 26) being configured for the press head (60) to come into contact with the press surface when the press head performs the pressing operation in a set state, the set state being a state in which the platen is set on the press head (Figures 16 and 17). With respect to claim 14, Kobayashi et al. teaches a processor, wherein the platen support base (61) includes a contact surface, the contact surface (632, 633) being configured to contact the press head in the set state, the contact surface (632, 633) is provided at a position different from the press surface (Figure 21), the press machine includes a sensor (79, 90), the sensor being configured to detect contact between the contact surface and the press head (Paragraph 0066, Paragraphs 0099, 0100, 0109), and the processor is configured to allow execution of the pressing operation when the contact between the contact surface and the press head is detected by the sensor (Paragraphs 0099, 0100, 0109). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. With respect to claim 6, the prior art does not teach or render obvious wherein a printer is provided with a print head and a conveyance support base, the print head is configured to perform printing on the print medium, the conveyance support base is configured to support the platen, and is configured to convey the platen to a separated position and a print position, when the platen is disposed at the separated position, the platen is configured for the placement surface to be disposed at a position separated, in a direction intersecting an up-down direction, from the print head, when the platen is disposed at the print position, the platen is configured for the placement surface to face the print head in the up-down direction, a printer support surface is provided on a lower surface, of the platen plate, on an opposite side from the placement surface, the printer support surface being configured for the conveyance support base to come into contact therewith, and the press surface is provided at a position different from the printer support surface. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kobayshi et al. (US Publication 2022/0315364, 2022/0126607, 20220315364, 2022/0324667) and Komiya (Us Publication 201/0162148) teaches platen/press units. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARISSA LIANA FERGUSON SAMRETH whose telephone number is (571)272-2163. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at 571-272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Marissa Ferguson-Samreth/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673485
MACHINE FOR PRODUCING 3D SCREEN-PRINTED ARTICLES
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668052
WIPING DEVICE FOR STENCIL PRINTER
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661905
AUTOMATIC PRODUCTION DEVICE FOR LABEL-FREE PACKAGING BOTTLES AND LABELING METHOD THEREOF
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661907
PRINTING SYSTEM, OPERATION SYSTEM, PRINTER, AND TERMINAL
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12628860
COOKIE CUTTER ALIGNMENT JIG
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 783 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month