Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/078,746

PRINTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Priority
Mar 15, 2024 — JP 2024-040897
Examiner
KNIEF, THOMAS RAY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
48 granted / 53 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
62
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 53 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on March 13, 2025 was filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wakayama (US 20130135426 A1). Regarding claim 1, Wakayama teaches a printing device on which a colorimeter that measures color of an image is mounted, the printing device comprising: a printing section that prints the image on a medium (fig. 1; printing unit 3, sheet S; ¶[0023], [0025]); a mounting section that mounts the colorimeter (fig. 7A; housing 20, presser plate 21, reference plate 25, guide rail 30, rotation shaft 51; ¶[0034], [0038], [0040]-[0041]); and a movement mechanism that moves the mounting section toward and away from the medium (figs. 7A-B; rotation shaft 51, movement mechanism 55, elevating motor 56; ¶[0041]), wherein the mounting section includes an accommodation member that accommodates the colorimeter (fig. 7A; carriage 33; ¶[0034]), and a pressing member that is attached to the accommodation member and that presses the colorimeter so as to approach the medium (fig. 7A; spring member 38; ¶[0036]). Regarding claim 7, Wakayama teaches the printing device according to claim 1, wherein the mounting section includes a holding member that holds the colorimeter and the holding member is attached for movement relative to the accommodation member and is configured to move relative to the accommodation member toward and away from the medium (figs. 7A-B; presser plate 21; ¶[0034], [0037]-[0038], [0040], [0055], [0068]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4, 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukuda et al. (US 20180086097 A1), hereinafter Fukuda, in view of Iwakoshi et al. (US 20190079438 A1), hereinafter Iwakoshi. Regarding claim 1, Fukuda teaches a printing device on which a colorimeter that measures color of an image is mounted, the printing device comprising: a printing section that prints the image on a medium (fig. 2; recording head 1, ink cartridge 2, recording sheet 100; ¶[0076], [0082]); a mounting section that mounts the colorimeter (fig. 2; color measuring unit 10, light projecting unit 20, light receiving unit 30; ¶[0083], [0094]-[0095]); and a movement mechanism that moves the mounting section toward and away from the medium (fig. 4; changing unit 40; ¶[0100]). However, Fukuda fails to teach or fairly suggest wherein the mounting section includes an accommodation member that accommodates the colorimeter, and a pressing member that is attached to the accommodation member and that presses the colorimeter so as to approach the medium. Iwakoshi teaches a colorimeter comprising a mounting section includes an accommodation member that accommodates the colorimeter, and a pressing member that is attached to the accommodation member and that presses the colorimeter so as to approach the medium (figs. 1A-B, 4A-B; colorimeter 11, colorimeter base 13, contact region 13a, biasing member 18; ¶[0086]-[0088]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the colorimeter of Iwakoshi into the printing device of Fukuda in order to improve reading accuracy by creating a contact state between the colorimeter and the medium (see Iwakoshi ¶[0008]) Regarding claim 2, Fukuda as modified by Iwakoshi teaches the printing device according to claim 1. Fukuda further teaches the printing section includes a head that ejects liquid and a carriage on which the head is mounted and the mounting section is attached to the carriage (fig. 2; recording head 1, carriage 3, carriage shaft 5, color measuring unit 10; ¶[0076], [0082]-[0083], [0094]-[0095]). Regarding claim 3, Fukuda as modified by Iwakoshi teaches the printing device according to claim 2. Iwakoshi further teaches mounting the colorimeter to a main body frame via the biasing member 18 and the motor 20 (figs. 1A-B, 2, 4A-B; ¶[0086] and [0101]). Iwakoshi further teaches a movement mechanism configured to move the colorimeter toward and away from a medium, wherein the colorimeter base 13 is mounted to the movement mechanism, and the movement mechanism is mounted to the main body frame (figs. 6A-F; contact region 13a, slide cam 15, inclined surface 15c, slide piece 15e, cam gear 17; ¶[0083], [0100], [0115]-[0122]). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, when combining the colorimeter of Iwakoshi with the printing apparatus of Fukuda, to mount the colorimeter in the manner described by Iwakoshi onto the carriage of Fukuda by replacing the points of attachment to Iwakoshi’s “main body frame” with points of attachment to the carriage of Fukuda in order to improve reading accuracy by creating a contact state between the colorimeter and the medium. Thus, Fukuda as modified by Iwakoshi renders obvious the printing device of claim 3, i.e. the printing device according to claim 2 wherein the mounting section is attached to the carriage via the movement mechanism. Regarding claim 4, Fukuda as modified by Iwakoshi teaches the printing device of according to claim 3. Iwakoshi further teaches mounting the colorimeter to a main body frame via the biasing member 18 and the motor 20 (figs. 1A-B, 2, 4A-B; ¶[0086] and [0101]). Iwakoshi further teaches a movement mechanism configured to move the colorimeter toward and away from a medium, wherein the colorimeter base 13 (accommodation member) is mounted to the movement mechanism, and the movement mechanism is mounted to the main body frame (figs. 6A-F; contact region 13a, slide cam 15, inclined surface 15c, slide piece 15e, cam gear 17; ¶[0083], [0100], [0115]-[0122]). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, when combining the colorimeter of Iwakoshi with the printing apparatus of Fukuda, to mount the colorimeter base (accommodation member) in the manner described by Iwakoshi onto the carriage of Fukuda by simply replacing the points of attachment to Iwakoshi’s “main body frame” with points of attachment to the carriage of Fukuda in order to improve reading accuracy by creating a contact state between the colorimeter and the medium. Thus, Fukuda as modified by Iwakoshi renders obvious the printing device of claim 4, i.e. the printing device according to claim 3 wherein the accommodation member is attached to the carriage via the movement mechanism. Regarding claim 6, Fukuda as modified by Iwakoshi teaches the printing device according to claim 1. Iwakoshi further teaches the colorimeter includes a contact portion to be pressed against the medium, the contact portion includes a contact surface that comes into contact with the medium, and the accommodation member accommodates the colorimeter so that the pressing member is positioned on an axis line that passes through a center of the contact portion and that extends perpendicularly to the contact surface (figs. 1A, 4A-C, 6A-F, 7A-F; colorimeter window 11a, colorimeter cover 12, shutter 14, biasing member 18; ¶[0080], [0085]-[0086], [0132]-[0138]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest the printing device of the claim, particularly including and in combination with, the accommodation member includes an accommodation body that accommodates the colorimeter and a cover that is configured to open and close with respect to the accommodation body and the pressing member is attached to the cover. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tatsuda (US 20190160839 A1) teaches a printing apparatus comprising a colorimeter attached to a carriage, wherein the colorimeter has its posture adjusted using a series of screws. Uchida (US 20130286080 A1) teaches a colorimeter comprising a cover, a biasing member, and a contact position. Morita et al. (US 20160004202 A1) teaches a carriage-borne colorimeter comprising an openable and closeable cover. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS RAY KNIEF whose telephone number is (703)756-5733. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8AM - 5 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at 5712722149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRK/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /STEPHEN D MEIER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734842
DIGITAL FLOCKING PROCESS
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728654
PRINTER HAVING ARRAY OF OVERLAPPING PRINTHEADS
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12709105
PRINTING APPARATUS AND PRINTING METHOD
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12697828
PRINTER
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691700
PRINTING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRINTED MATTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 53 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month