Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/079,041

MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Priority
Mar 21, 2024 — JP 2024-045516
Examiner
KUMAR, RAKESH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
579 granted / 1016 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1058
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
79.1%
+39.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1016 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitations “to perform desired processing” in line 3. It is unclear as to what is the process that is desired to be performed and how the desired processed is determined that is to be performed. Appropriate clarification is required. Claims 1-6 recite the limitations “circuitry configured to control a supply operation” in line 10. It is unclear as to how a circuity which is generally construed as the wiring between the components is or can be configured to control a supply operation beyond the simple transmitting of a signal between components. Control of a supply operation is generally controlled by a processor or a controller with logic to operate components successively or in unison to perform the said function. Appropriate clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Saito (WO 2024150159 A1). Referring to claim 1. Saito discloses a medium processing apparatus (1; Figure 1), comprising: a liquid applier (31; Figure 3) to apply liquid to a part of a medium to perform a liquid application (The liquid applier 31 executes a liquid application process; Para. [0028]); a medium processing device (32; Figure 3) to perform desired processing on a bundle of media (The crimper 32 serves as a post-processing device and executes a crimping process; Para. [0028]) including the medium subjected to the liquid application (As illustrated in FIG. 3, the edge binder 25 includes the liquid applier 31 and a crimper 32. The liquid applier 31 executes a liquid application process. The crimper 32 serves as a post-processing device and executes a crimping process; Para. [0028]); a liquid storage (43; Figure 4) to store liquid used for the liquid application by the liquid applier (31; Figure 3); a liquid detector (sensor 43a and sensor 94; Figure 4) to detect an amount of liquid in the liquid storage (The output value (voltage) output when the first liquid-level sensor 43a detects the liquid (liquid level) in the first liquid storage tank 43 is input to the controller 100B as a control device; Para. [0087]); and circuitry (3; wiring of circuits; see Figure 8) configured to control a supply operation of supplying the liquid to the liquid applier (31; Figure 3) to set a liquid applicable state in which the liquid applier (31; Figure 3) can apply the liquid to the at least one medium (Pb) based on information from the liquid detector (sensor 43a and sensor 94; Figure 4), the circuitry (controller 3; wiring of circuits; see Figure 8) configured to change a transition time to the liquid applicable state, based on the amount of liquid in the liquid storage (43) detected by the liquid detector (sensor 43a and sensor 94; Figures 4, 12, 13; par. 90, 94, 95, 98-111, the transition time to the liquid applicable state of step S705 of fig. 13a is changed depending on the detection results in steps S703, S707 and S712 in fig. 13A because, e.g., the necessary time to reach step S705 is different depending on whether additional processes in case of step S703 "NO" have to be performed or not in case of step S703 “YES”). Referring to claim 2. Saito discloses a medium processing apparatus (1; Figure 1), comprising: wherein the circuitry changes (controller 3; wiring of circuits; see Figure 8) the transition time so as to immediately transition to the liquid applicable state, when the amount of liquid in the liquid storage is equal to or greater than a predetermined amount (step S703 controller detects the output value of first liquid level sensor is greater than or equal to a threshold value; step S706 start driving liquid supply pump after detection; Figure 13A). Referring to claim 3. Saito discloses a medium processing apparatus (1; Figure 1), comprising: wherein the circuitry (controller 3; wiring of circuits; see Figure 8) changes the transition time so as to transition to the liquid applicable state after waiting for a predetermined time (wait 10 seconds; step S710; Figure 13A), when the amount of liquid in the liquid storage is less than a predetermined amount (Step S703, no). Referring to claim 4. Saito discloses a medium processing apparatus (1; Figure 1), comprising: wherein the circuitry (controller 3; wiring of circuits; see Figure 8) compares a supplying time of the liquid in the supply operation with a preset time to determine the amount of liquid in the liquid storage (see operation steps in Figure 13A, 13B,18, 27 and 28). Referring to claims 5 and 6. Saito discloses a medium processing apparatus (1; Figure 1), comprising: an input device (110; Figure 27) to change the preset time in response to a user operation, wherein the circuitry (controller 3; wiring of circuits; see Figure 8) sets the preset time based on an input value from the input device (the image forming apparatus 2 includes the operation panel 110. The operation panel 110 includes an operation device that receives instructions from a user and a display serving as a notifier that notifies the user of information. The operation device includes, for example, hard keys and a touch screen overlaid on the display. The operation panel 110 acquires information from the user through the operation device and provides information to the user through the display; Para. [0068]). Regarding claim 6, see claim rejections 1-5 cited above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAKESH KUMAR whose telephone number is (571)272-8314. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH from 8AM-6:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAKESH KUMAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668413
STORAGE SYSTEM FOR PERISHABLE ITEMS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660965
LOADING DEVICE FOR SHEET PRODUCT DISPENSERS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12637346
UNATTENDED BEVERAGE DISPENSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
4y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635819
Detachable Shoe Cover Adapted to be Dispensed by a Dispenser Device
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12612282
CARD ISSUING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+28.4%)
2y 11m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1016 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month