Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/079,694

PREPROCESSING METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REMOTE SENSING IMAGES, AND REPRESENTATION DETERMINING METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REMOTE SENSING IMAGES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 14, 2025
Priority
Mar 15, 2024 — CN 202410303395.6
Examiner
STREGE, JOHN B
Art Unit
2669
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Alipay.com Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
960 granted / 1104 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1124
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1104 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xiong et al. CN116452800 (hereinafter “Xiong”, cited in the IDS, a machine translation is provided that is relied upon by the Examiner in the rejection below). Regarding claim 1, Xiong discloses a method for remote sensing images (see the bottom of page 6, the invention relates to a semantic description method of a remote sensing image) PNG media_image1.png 104 772 media_image1.png Greyscale comprising: dividing a global remote sensing image into sub-image regions in a predetermined manner (see top of page 7, step 1.1 the image is uniformly divided into a plurality of sub-regions) PNG media_image2.png 50 762 media_image2.png Greyscale for each sub-image region of the sub-image regions: determining image point features of image points in the sub-image region based on a feature extraction model (see page 7 step 1.2, judging whether the input image contains obvious clustering features through threshold value truncation [threshold value truncation is interpreted as a feature extraction model]); PNG media_image3.png 88 756 media_image3.png Greyscale identifying image points in the sub-image region based on the image point features (see above step 1.2 which identifies whether the input image contains obvious clustering features); and determining a cluster center for the identified image points; (see page 7, step 1.3.2, clustering pseudo-semantic points to obtain a better clustering center) PNG media_image4.png 92 732 media_image4.png Greyscale and adjusting a remote sensing model based on cluster centers determined for each of the sub- image regions (see page 7 step 2 and 3 generate a single sentence description for the target subregion obtained in the step 1 which the Examiner interprets as adjusting the remote sensing model using the cluster centers). PNG media_image5.png 454 762 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Xiong discloses the dividing a global remote sensing image into sub-image regions in a predetermined manner comprises: dividing the global remote sensing image based on a predetermined remote sensing tile-level size (see step 1.1, divided into 16 regions). Regarding claim 3, Xiong discloses the determining image point features of image points in the sub-image region comprises: obtaining prior knowledge of the sub-image region; and determining the image point features of the image points in the sub-image region based on the prior knowledge (see above step 2.1 the image features are extracted using a Resnet pretrained [prior knowledge] and pixel level features are extracted using FCN). Regarding claim 4, Xiong discloses dividing the sub-image region into patches (see step 1.1 above); and for each patch, inputting the prior knowledge and the patch into the feature extraction model to obtain image point features of a plurality of image points in the patch (see step 2.1 above). Regarding claim 5, Xiong discloses wherein a size of the image point is a predetermined pixel-level size (see above step 2.1 the small-scale image of size 256 pixels is input). Regarding claim 6, Xiong discloses obtaining a first remote sensing image to be processed and first position information of the first remote sensing image (see step 1 inputting a wide remote sensing image to generate a subarea); determining, based on the first position information, a first sub-image region of the sub-image regions having position information that matches the first position information (see step 3.2 the description vocabulary of the relative position is determined); determining a target image point corresponding to the first remote sensing image from first image points comprised in the first sub-image region (see page 7 cited above the target sub-region generation module is used for dividing and extracting key description regions according to the semantic distribution characteristics of the images); determining, based on predetermined correspondences between the first image points and the cluster centers, a cluster center corresponding to the target image point (see page 8, a semantic clustering unit is used for generation a semantic center through clustering) PNG media_image6.png 416 784 media_image6.png Greyscale ; and determining a representation of the first remote sensing image based on the cluster center (see above cited section where the cluster centers are used to generate a single sentence description for the image using LSTM). Regarding claim 7, Xiong discloses performing feature fusion on the cluster center and the first remote sensing image to obtain the representation of the first remote sensing image (see step 3.1 above carrying out summary merging [fusion] on the descriptions according to the clustering relation). Claims 8-14 are similarly analyzed to claims 1-7. Claims 15-20 are similarly analyzed to claims 1-7. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see the attached 892 notice of references cited. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN B STREGE whose telephone number is (571)272-7457. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chan Park can be reached at (571)272-7409. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN B STREGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770358
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, TRAINING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, TRAINING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762831
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING SYNTHETIC SATELLITE IMAGE TRAINING DATA FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762835
MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPUTER VISION SOLUTIONS TO SEAMLESS VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRACKING THEREFOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762827
SEMANTIC GUIDED SCENE FLOW ESTIMATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762878
Method, system and device for analysing placement of digital assets in a user interface
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 11m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1104 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month