Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/079,943

NEEDLE-PEENING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2025
Priority
Mar 08, 2019 — JP 2019-042366 +2 more
Examiner
TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
JFE Steel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1066 granted / 1367 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1367 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharman et al. (9,605,328) in view of Suzuki et al. (JP 2017-94396). Sharman discloses (Fig. 3) that a peening pin (14) is ultrasonically vibrated (col. 4, lines 1-3 and 15-18) in a center axis direction perpendicular to and located on a weld toe (21; intersection between 10,12; col. 5, lines 48- 50), the peening pin (14) is rotated (col. 4, lines 65-67) on a circle diameter (22) on the weld toe (21; Fig. 3) about a rotation axis (axis into page at a center of the circle, 22) which is parallel to the center axis (vibrational axis), then a center axis of the peening pin (14) is offset from the rotation axis at a position parallel to the rotation axis as the peening pin (14) rotates around a second circle diameter (22) with an offset center along a longitudinal weld seam (18; col. 4, lines 64-67) which is a linear path down a length of the weld seam (18). As the peening pin (14) is moved along the weld toe, along the arrows (Fig. 3), each axis of each circle diameter (22) is parallel to and offset longitudinally from the previous circle diameter. Sharman does not disclose that the pin has a radius of curvature of 0.1mm to 1mm. Suzuki teaches (page 6, 2ⁿᵈ to last paragraph) that a pin radius of curvature experimentation is conducted with radius of curvature values of 0.2mm, 0.5mm and 0.8mm. It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to modify a radius of curvature of the tip of the peening pin of Sharman to be between 0.05mm to 1mm as taught by Suzuki according to a size of the toe weld so that the pin tip radius of curvature is selected to be larger or smaller than the toe weld radius in order to suppress wrinkle folding during ultrasonic impact treatment. Regarding claim 2, Sharman discloses that a portion (31; col. 7, lines 41-44) toward a weld bead side (10) and a base metal side (12) with a weld toe (21; Fig. 3) as a center is peened during the moving along the weld toe (21). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD THOMAS TOLAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4525. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Templeton can be reached at 571-270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD T TOLAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766579
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BATTERY CASE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND BATTERY CASE MANUFACTURED THEREBY
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759036
A METHOD FOR FORMING A DEEP DRAW CLOSURE CAP
4y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752331
WORKPIECE TRANSFER METHOD, WORKPIECE TRANSFER DEVICE, AND WORKPIECE TRANSFER PROGRAM
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752327
THIN-WALLED COMPOSITE PIPE WITH HIGH THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY, AND PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746590
METHOD OF BENDING AND BENDING MACHINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF A METHOD OF BENDING
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1367 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month