Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/080,211

METHOD OF PREPARING POLYMER PARTICLES AND POLYMER PARTICLES PREPARED THEREBY

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 14, 2025
Examiner
SERGENT, RABON A
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shpp Global Technologies B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
525 granted / 970 resolved
-10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1023
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 970 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Election of Species Requirement 2. Applicant's election with traverse of polycarbonate particles and method of making the polycarbonate particles in the reply filed on 02 December 2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that no undue burden is believed to be present and that the examiner has not established that the different species have a separate classification, a separate status in the art, or a different field of search. This is not found persuasive because in accordance with Office practice, the examiner has set forth rationale explaining why a serious search burden is present and applicant has not distinctly and specifically pointed out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for concluding that the requirement is in error (MPEP 818.01). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 4. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The language, “the polymer powder”, within claim 8, lacks antecedent basis. Prior Art Rejections 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO 2019/040314 A1. WO 2019/040314 A1 discloses polycarbonate particles having a Dv50 particle size of less than 125 micrometers. See abstract, paragraphs [0058]-[0061], and Tables 2 and 3. It has not been established that the method yields a patentably distinct product. 7. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO 2017/040887 A1. WO 2017/040887314 A1 discloses polycarbonate particles having a D50 particle size of 20 to 100 micrometers, which meets the claimed particle size limitation. See abstract, paragraphs [0003], [0074], and [0075], and Table 3. It has not been established that the method yields a patentably distinct product. 8. Claims 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by EP 376653 A2. EP 376653 A2 discloses partially crystalline polycarbonate particles having a maximum dimension from 0.1 to 100 micrometers, which satisfies the claimed Dv50 value. See abstract and page 1, lines 31-46. It has not been established that the method yields a patentably distinct product. 9. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO 2018/080911 A1. WO 2018/080911 A1 discloses the production of semi-crystalline polymer particles having a Dv50 value that meets that claimed (see abstract and Table 2), wherein polycarbonate is disclosed within paragraph [0039] in the same grouping as polyetherimide, accordingly the position is taken that the reference encompasses the use of polycarbonate polymers within the process to produce polymer particles. The process of preparing polymer particles includes combining a polymer and a solvent, meeting that claimed (see paragraph [0030]), at a first temperature, meeting that claimed (see paragraph [0020]), to provide a slurry, wherein the polymer is not soluble in the solvent at the first temperature; heating the slurry to a second temperature and at a pressure, meeting those claimed (see paragraphs [0041] and [0043]), effective to dissolve the polyetherimide in the solvent to provide a homogenous solution; cooling the homogenous solution to a third temperature, meeting that claimed (see paragraph [0044]), to provide a dispersion including a plurality of polymer particles; and isolating the polymer particles. Regarding claim 7, the claimed solids content is disclosed within paragraph [0020]. Regarding claim 8, isolating by means of filtration is disclosed within paragraph [0049]. 10. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2018/080911 A1. WO 2018/080911 A1 discloses the production of semi-crystalline polymer particles having a Dv50 value that meets that claimed (see abstract and Table 2), wherein polycarbonate is disclosed within paragraph [0039] in the same grouping as polyetherimide. The process of preparing polymer particles includes combining a polymer and a solvent, meeting that claimed (see paragraph [0030]), at a first temperature, meeting that claimed (see paragraph [0020]), to provide a slurry, wherein the polymer is not soluble in the solvent at the first temperature; heating the slurry to a second temperature and at a pressure, meeting those claimed (see paragraphs [0041] and [0043]), effective to dissolve the polyetherimide in the solvent to provide a homogenous solution; cooling the homogenous solution to a third temperature, meeting that claimed (see paragraph [0044]), to provide a dispersion including a plurality of polymer particles; and isolating the polymer particles. Regarding claim 7, the claimed solids content is disclosed within paragraph [0020]. Regarding claim 8, isolating by means of filtration is disclosed within paragraph [0049]. 11. Even if it is determined that the disclosure of polycarbonate fails to be anticipatory, as set forth above within paragraph 10, the position is taken in view of the disclosure of polycarbonate, that it would have been obvious to produce polycarbonate particles using the disclosed process, so as to obtain particles having the claimed properties. Regarding claim 9, though the reference fails to disclose the polycarbonate being amorphous initially, it is noted that the reference discloses that polyetherimides are amorphous within paragraph [0001], and that polyetherimides can be processed in accordance with the teachings of the reference to produce semi-crystalline products. Accordingly, the position is taken that it would have been obvious to process amorphous polycarbonates in accordance with the teachings of the reference to also produce semi-crystalline products. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rabon A Sergent whose telephone number is (571)272-1079. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 5:00 PM, ET. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heidi Riviere Kelley, can be reached at telephone number 571-270-1831. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /RABON A SERGENT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589153
POLYURETHANE EXCIPIENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583964
POLYTHIOL COMPOSITION, POLYMERIZABLE COMPOSITION, RESIN, MOLDED ARTICLE, OPTICAL MATERIAL, AND LENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570785
THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE RESIN ELASTOMERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559586
COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING URETDIONE GROUPS CROSSLINKING AT LOW TEMPERATURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12545760
URETHANE RESIN COMPOSITION, FILM, AND SYNTHETIC LEATHER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+24.8%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 970 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month