Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/081,797

FIREARM INCLUDING ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS TO ENHANCE USER EXPERIENCE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 17, 2025
Examiner
ELDRED, JOHN W
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Laser Aiming Systems Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
767 granted / 992 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1014
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 5, 8-10, 15, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Horne et al (5,142,805). Horne et al disclose a firearm 10 comprising all claimed elements including a barrel; a slide; a frame with a grip, the grip 16, 18 having a chamber to receive a magazine; a plurality of sensors 34, 38 carried by the grip, the sensors for sensing a state of the magazine corresponding to a number of ammunition cartridges in the magazine and sending a signal corresponding to that number; a display 24 on the rear surface of the grip, the display comprising a plurality of illuminating devices (including an LCD and a back light 40) and where the display is coupled to the sensors to receive the signal and then visually present the number of cartridges in the magazine; a controller 22, 42, 50 carried by the frame and coupled to the sensors and the display; and where the sensors can be pressure activation switches 100, 102; and a detachable portion 16 of the grip which carries at least one of the sensors. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horne et al (5,142,805) in view of Herold et al (5,826,360). Horne et al disclose a firearm 10 comprising most claimed elements including a barrel; a slide; a frame with a grip, the grip 16, 18 having a chamber to receive a magazine; a plurality of sensors 34, 38 carried by the grip, the sensors for sensing a state of the magazine corresponding to a number of ammunition cartridges in the magazine and sending a signal corresponding to that number; a display 24 (including an LCD and a back light 40) on the rear surface of the grip, the display comprising a plurality of illuminating devices and where the display is coupled to the sensors to receive the signal and then visually present the number of cartridges in the magazine; a controller 22, 42, 50 carried by the frame and coupled to the sensors and the display; and where the sensors can be pressure activation switches 100, 102; and a detachable portion 16 of the grip which carries at least one of the sensors. Horne et al fail to show sensors adapted to sense the position of a magazine follower and, in particular, being a Hall sensor to sense the follower position. Herold et al teach that it is known in a pistol ammunition counting system to use a Hall sensor (column 12, lines 13- 14) to determine the position of a magazine follower to determine the number of cartridges in the magazine. Motivation to combine is merely substituting known ways to determine how many cartridges are in the magazine, with the attendant advantages inherent in determining where the element that actually moves the cartridges is positioned. To employ the teachings of Herold et al on the pistol of Horne et al and have a Hall sensor determining the position of the follower is considered to have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horne et al (5,142,805) in view of Bensayan et al (2015/0113851). Horne et al disclose a firearm 10 comprising most claimed elements including a barrel; a slide; a frame with a grip, the grip 16, 18 having a chamber to receive a magazine; a plurality of sensors 34, 38 carried by the grip, the sensors for sensing a state of the magazine corresponding to a number of ammunition cartridges in the magazine and sending a signal corresponding to that number; a display 24 (including an LCD and a back light 40) on the rear surface of the grip, the display comprising a plurality of illuminating devices and where the display is coupled to the sensors to receive the signal and then visually present the number of cartridges in the magazine; a controller 22, 42, 50 carried by the frame and coupled to the sensors and the display; and where the sensors can be pressure activation switches 100, 102; and a detachable portion 16 of the grip which carries at least one of the sensors. Horne et al fail to show the activation sensors are capacitive touch sensors. Bensayan et al teach that it is known to use capacitive touch sensors as activation sensors in firearms. Motivation to combine is the mere substitution of known sensors to perform the same function. To employ the teachings of Bensayan et al on the pistol of Horne et al and have a capacitive activation sensor is considered to have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art. Claims 7, 11, 12, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horne et al (5,142,805) in view of Seckman (2016/0069629). Horne et al disclose a firearm 10 comprising most claimed elements including a barrel; a slide; a frame with a grip, the grip 16, 18 having a chamber to receive a magazine; a plurality of sensors 34, 38 carried by the grip, the sensors for sensing a state of the magazine corresponding to a number of ammunition cartridges in the magazine and sending a signal corresponding to that number; a display 24 (including an LCD and a back light 40) on the rear surface of the grip, the display comprising a plurality of illuminating devices and where the display is coupled to the sensors to receive the signal and then visually present the number of cartridges in the magazine; a controller 22, 42, 50 carried by the frame and coupled to the sensors and the display; and where the sensors can be pressure activation switches 100, 102; and a detachable portion 16 of the grip which carries at least one of the sensors. Horne et al fail to show acceleration sensors for detecting positions of the firearm and allowing activation of the systems. Seckman teaches (see paragraph 47) that it is known to use acceleration sensors 26 as firearm motion/position indicators and activation sensors in firearms with magazine round counters. Motivation to combine is the improved performance of using known sensors to provide data on when to activate the firearm systems. To employ the teachings of Seckman on the pistol of Horne et al and have an acceleration motion/position and activation sensor is considered to have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art. Claims 13, 14, 18, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horne et al (5,142,805) in view of Seckman (2016/0069629) as applied to claims 7, 11, 12, and 17 above, and further in view of Bensayan et al (2015/0113851). Horne et al fail to show the activation sensors are capacitive touch sensors. Bensayan et al teach that it is known to use capacitive touch sensors as activation sensors in firearms. Motivation to combine is the mere substitution of known sensors to perform the same function. To employ the teachings of Bensayan et al on the pistol of Horne et al and have a capacitive activation sensor is considered to have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horne et al (5,142,805) in view of Seckman (2016/0069629) and Bensayan et al (2015/0113851) as applied to claims 13, 14, 18, and 19 above and further in view of Herold et al (5,826,360). Horne et al fail to show sensors adapted to sense the position of a magazine follower and, in particular, being a Hall sensor to sense the follower position. Herold et al teach that it is known in a pistol ammunition counting system to use a Hall sensor (column 12, lines 13- 14) to determine the position of a magazine follower to determine the number of cartridges in the magazine. Motivation to combine is merely substituting known ways to determine how many cartridges are in the magazine, with the attendant advantages inherent in determining where the element that actually moves the cartridges is positioned. To employ the teachings of Herold et al on the pistol of Horne et al and have a Hall sensor determining the position of the follower is considered to have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to J. WOODROW ELDRED whose telephone number is (571)272-6901. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J. Woodrow Eldred/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641 JWE
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 17, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601554
FIREARM LOADER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595988
Stitched Body Armor Panels with Offset Construction
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12571602
Trigger Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571605
Firearm Shooting Rest
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566050
PROTECTIVE VEHICLE SURROUND SHIELD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month