Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/082,661

ELECTRIC LIQUID PUMP

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 18, 2025
Examiner
LETTMAN, BRYAN MATTHEW
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
609 granted / 941 resolved
-5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+52.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
978
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 941 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication 2019/0353168 to Fujikawa in view of U. S. Patent Publication 2012/0224991 to Lipinski, U. S. Patent Publication 2018/0340533 to Bohm and U. S. Patent Publication 2020/0007004 to Kim. Referring to claim 1, Fujikawa teaches an electric liquid pump comprising: an electric motor (30) including a motor rotor that has a shaft (15) and a magnet portion (34) integrated with one axial end of the shaft (15), and a stator (33) that is disposed radially outside or inside the magnet portion (34) and rotates the motor rotor (15, 34) (Fig. 1, annotated below; paragraphs [0015]-[0024]); a liquid pump (14) including an inner rotor (22) that has an external tooth and is integrated with an other axial end of the shaft (15), and an outer rotor (23) that has an internal tooth meshing with the external tooth and forms, together with the inner rotor (22), a gap volume portion (24) into which a liquid is suctioned from a suction passage (26) and from which the liquid is discharged toward a discharge passage (25) (Fig. 1, annotated below; paragraphs [0015]-[0024]); a motor case (32) having a box shape and including therein a first accommodation chamber that accommodates the stator and one axial part of the motor rotor including the magnet portion, a second accommodation chamber that communicates with the first accommodation chamber and accommodates an other axial part of the motor rotor, and a partition wall that has a hole-shaped communication portion allowing the first accommodation chamber and the second accommodation chamber to communicate with each other and is provided between the first accommodation chamber and the second accommodation chamber, in which the liquid circulates through the first accommodation chamber, the second accommodation chamber, and the hole-shaped communication portion (Fig. 1, annotated below; paragraphs [0015]-[0024]); and a body (12) including a centering body portion inserted into the hole-shaped communication portion to be centered, a general body portion being continuous with the centering body portion and accommodated in the second accommodation chamber, and a bearing portion (19) formed to penetrate the centering body portion and the general body portion and supporting an axial one portion of the shaft (15) at a position between the magnet portion (34) and the inner rotor (22) (Fig. 1, annotated below; paragraphs [0015]-[0024]). [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: connector][AltContent: connector][AltContent: ][AltContent: connector][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (General Body Portion)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Centering Body Portion)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Partition Wall)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (Second Accommodation Chamber)][AltContent: textbox (Communication Portion)][AltContent: textbox (Rotor Other Axial End)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Rotor One Axial End)][AltContent: textbox (First Accommodation Chamber)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 550 698 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotation of Fujikawa Figure 1. Fujikawa is silent as to the material of the inner rotor, the outer rotor and the body, and silent as to how magnets 36 are attached. Lipinski teaches a pump wherein: each of an inner rotor and an outer rotor is made of a thermosetting resin (paragraphs [0022]-[0023]). It would be obvious to one of skill in the art, at the time of invention, to modify the pump taught by Fujikawa with the rotor material taught by Lipinski, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Lipinski does not teach a body is made of a thermosetting resin or a magnet portion that is a bonded magnet. Bohm teaches a pump wherein: a body (15) is made of a thermosetting resin (paragraph [0051]). It would be obvious to one of skill in the art, at the time of invention, to modify the pump taught by Fujikawa with the body material taught by Bohm, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Bohm does not teach a magnet portion that is a bonded magnet. Kim teaches a pump wherein: a magnet portion (191) is a bonded magnet (paragraph [0066]). It would have been obvious before the invention was effectively filed, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to include the magnet portion as taught by Kim into the device of Fujikawa because it has been held that a simple substitution of one known element, the magnet portion of Kim, for another, the magnet portion of Fujikawa, to obtain predictable results, driving the pump, was an obvious extension of prior art teachings, KSR, 550 U.S. at 419, 82 USPQ2d at 1396, MPEP 2141 III B. Referring to claim 2, Fujikawa, Lipinski, Bohm and Kim teach a pump comprising all the limitations of claim 1, as detailed above and Fujikawa further teaches a pump wherein: the motor case (32) has a board chamber (52) liquid-tightly isolated from the first accommodation chamber and the second accommodation chamber, and a control board (53) for the stator (33) is disposed in the board chamber (52) (Fig. 1, annotated above; paragraphs [0015]-[0024]). Referring to claim 3, Fujikawa, Lipinski, Bohm and Kim teach a pump comprising all the limitations of claim 1, as detailed above, but Fujikawa is silent as to the material of the inner rotor, the outer rotor and the body. Lipinski further teaches a pump wherein: at least one of a thermosetting resin material used for the outer rotor, or a thermosetting resin material used for the inner rotor includes a phenol resin (paragraphs [0022]-[0023]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. IImura, Miyagawa, Pawellek and Sakat teach similar pumps as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYAN MATTHEW LETTMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7860. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Essama Omgba can be reached at 469-295-9278. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRYAN M LETTMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577960
FLUID PUMP WITH EMBEDDED HEAT DISSIPATING PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565877
ELECTRICALLY OPERATED LINEAR PUMP AND PUMP DRIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12565893
REVERSING POLARITY OF A PUMP ON FAILURE, AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12565878
RADIAL PISTON PUMPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560158
DIAPHRAGM PUMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 941 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month