Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/083,899

TRANSMISSION LINE, FEED NETWORK, AND ANTENNA APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 19, 2025
Priority
Sep 20, 2022 — CN 202211144650.4 +1 more
Examiner
TRA, ANH QUAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
818 granted / 1123 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1123 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by George et al. (US 20190043919). As to claim 1, George et al.’s figure 8 shows a transmission line, used for a radio frequency device (microwave transmission line, ¶0089, ¶0141), comprising a reflector (304-1 and/or 304-2), an insulation support (312), and a transmission structure (306), wherein the transmission structure comprises plurality of side walls; an angle between two adjacent side walls among the plurality of side walls of the transmission structure is greater than zero, and different side walls among the plurality of side walls of the transmission structure are located on different surfaces of the insulation support; and at least one side wall among the plurality of side walls of the transmission structure is disposed opposite to at least one surface of the reflector, and a gap exists between the at least one side wall of the transmission structure and the reflector. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US 20230208001) in view of George et al. (US 20190043919) and/or Yoshida et al. (US 20150380797). As to claim 1, Kim et al.’s figures 2A-2B 8 show a transmission line, used for a radio frequency device (¶0004), comprising a reflector (210), an insulation support (230), and a transmission structure (220). The figures fail to show that the transmission structure comprises plurality of side walls; an angle between two adjacent side walls among the plurality of side walls of the transmission structure is greater than zero, and different side walls among the plurality of side walls of the transmission structure are located on different surfaces of the insulation support. However, George et al.’s figures show that a single layer transmission line 306 in figure 6 is replaced with transmission structure 306 disposed on the surfaces of the insulation support 312. Yoshida et al.’s figures 2A-2B also show a transmission line that comprises transmission structure 8 disposed on the surfaces of the insulation support 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to use George et al.’s transmission structure 306 in figure 8 or Yoshida et al.’s transmission structure for Kim et al.’s transmission structure 220 for the purpose of improving performance (George’s ¶0004). The modified Kim et al.’s figures further show that at least one side wall among the plurality of side walls of the transmission structure is disposed opposite to at least one surface of the reflector, and a gap exists between the at least one side wall of the transmission structure and the reflector. As to claim 2, Goeorge et al.’s figure 13 shows a device comprises antenna 2022, Kim’s figure 1B shows that a device comprises antenna, and Yoshida et al.’s figure 1 shows a device comprises antenna 16. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to use the George et al. and Kim et al.’s transmission line to drive an antenna for the purpose of improving the driving performance. Thus, the shown the radio frequency device is an antenna apparatus, a filter, a power splitter, a combiner, or a phase shifter. As to claim 3, Kim et al. or George et al.’s figures show a feed network, used for an antenna apparatus, comprising at least one transmission line as claimed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-20 are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH-QUAN TRA whose telephone number is (571)272-1755. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri from 8:00 A.M.-5:00 P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUAN TRA/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700847
ELASTIC WAVE DEVICE, FILTER, SPLITTER, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701922
Interdigital Resonator and Filter
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689349
ACOUSTIC WAVE FILTER AND RADIO FREQUENCY MODULE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12674825
Wireless Circuitry with Low-Noise Peak Detection
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671389
UNAPODIZATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1123 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month