Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/084,623

BULLET WITH JACKET IMPROVEMENTS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 19, 2025
Examiner
BERGIN, JAMES S
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Federal Cartridge Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
792 granted / 999 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1022
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 7, “the forward ogive portion”, lacks a proper antecedent basis. In claim 1, lines 10-13, the following limitations are not understood: “the jacket comprising: a midline extending longitudinally at the middle of the radial thickness of the jacket to an endpoint where the radial thickness changes substantially or the jacket terminates”. It is unclear what defines the midline of the jacket? Is the midline of the jacket coincident with the central axis of the bullet? In claim 1, lines 19-21, the following limitations are not understood: “wherein the midline of the jacket defines the inward curl of the end portion by rotating radially inward from a departure orientation at a starting point of the end portion to a terminal orientation at an ending point of the end portion, the terminal orientation being arranged at a curl angle w of at least about 0 degrees measured radially inwardly relative to the central axis”? It remains unclear what defines the midline of the jacket? Is the midline of the jacket coincident with the central axis of the bullet? In claims 4 and 5, the term, “the midline of the jacket”, remains unclear. In claim 9, line 1, “the deformable material”, lacks a proper antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Frees et al. (US 2022/0412704 A1). The applied reference has a common inventor with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C.102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B); or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. See generally MPEP § 717.02. Regarding claims 1-6, 9, 10, 15-19, Frees et al. disclose a hollow point bullet 4 (Figs. 1A, 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 7 and 8), the bullet comprising a core 39, a cavity 50 in a forward portion of the core, the cavity 50 may be filled with a deformable plug or polymeric material (paras [0072], [0133]); a jacket 38 comprising a rear cup portion, the jacket extending forwardly along the outer surface of the core, the end portions of the jacket curling about the opening 49 and into the cavity 50 (Figs. 3, 4); and a plurality of skives 48 in the ogive portion of the jacket 38. Frees et al disclose that the forward end cavity 50 may be differently shaped (para [0135]). The curved end portions of the jacket 38 retain the jacket on the core (Fig. 3). The degree of curvature of the end portions of the jacket is a variable that effects jacket retention on the core. The greater the inward curvature of the jacket end portions, the stronger the jacket retention. It would have been obvious to a POSITA before the effective filing date of the invention, to select any appropriate degree of curvature for the end portions of the jacket to arrive at a desired jacket retention on the core, the degree of curvature comprising a results effecting variable. Regarding claim 7, Frees et al. disclose the shear groove 55 (Figs. 2a, 3). Regarding claim 8, Frees et al. disclose that the end portions of the jacket partially defines the cavity 50 (Figs. 3, 4). Regarding claims 11 and 20, Frees et al. do not disclose a double walled region of the jacket. It would have been obvious to a POSITA before the effective filing date of the invention, to select a double walled region of the jacket at the curved end portions, so as to further strengthen the attachment of the jacket to the core and to prevent premature stripping of the jacket off the core at impact. Regarding claim 12, Frees et al. disclose that the jacket does not fully enclose the core 39 (Figs. 3, 4). Regarding claims 13 and 14, Frees et al. disclose that the core material may be swaged into the cup 73 of jacket material (para [00134]; Fig 16), but does not suggest partial bonding or bonding only rearward of the skives. The examiner takes official notice that partial bonding of a jacket to a core was well known in the prior art, the partial bonding enabling a variable degree of stripping of the jacket and deformation of the core at impact. It would therefore have been obvious to a POSITA before the effective filing date of the invention, to select a degree of partial bonding of the jacket to the core, so as to achieve a desired stripping of the jacket and deformation of the core at impact, the partial bonding being a result effecting variable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See the attached PTO-FORM 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES S BERGIN whose telephone number is (571)272-6872. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES S BERGIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601573
METHOD AND TOOL FOR PRODUCING A BASE PIECE OF A MULTI-PART CARTRIDGE CASE, BASE PIECE AND CARTRIDGE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601575
RANGE EXTENSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584719
IMPROVED END CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584718
EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC FIREWORK IGNITER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571620
AMMUNITION PRESS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month