Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/084,900

Electrostatic Input Device

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Examiner
MISHLER, ROBIN J
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Alps Alpine Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 707 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Watanabe (US 2015/0002459). Regarding claim 1, Watanabe discloses electrostatic input device comprising: a plurality of electrostatic sensor electrodes (see 11 in fig. 1); a measurement circuit (see measurement unit in para. 28) that outputs a measurement value based on a capacitance between each of the plurality of electrostatic sensor electrodes and an indication body (para. 28, 36; wherein body is e.g. a finger); a control unit (see determination unit n para. 28) that determines, based on the measurement value output by the measurement circuit (para. 28), whether a state is a proximity state in which the indication body is in proximity to the plurality of electrostatic sensor electrodes (para. 28, 36); and a storage unit (see RAM in fig. 1) that stores as a reference value (see base line value in para. 51) a measurement value in a state in which the indication body is not in proximity to the plurality of electrostatic sensor electrodes (para. 51, 54; wherein the baseline of each sensor is determined in the calibration operation), wherein the control unit determines whether a state is a proximity state based on a first difference value (DIFF in para. 72) obtained by subtracting the reference value from a measurement value (para. 72; wherein DIFF = raw value measurement – base line value; wherein raw value reads on measurement value and base line value reads on reference value), calculates a sum difference value obtained by summing up a plurality of the first difference values of the plurality of electrostatic sensor electrodes (para. 77, 79; wherein multiple DIFFs are summed), and when a state in which a fluctuation amount of the sum difference value is smaller than a predetermined value (see para. 93, wherein the update determination threshold reads on a predetermined value) continues for a predetermined time (see predetermined time in para. 93) or longer after the sum difference value decreases in the proximity state (see para. 93-94; wherein DIFF decreases in the proximity state), updates the reference value (para. 94; wherein the baseline is updated). Regarding claim 13, Watanabe discloses an electrostatic input device comprising: an electrostatic sensor electrode (11, fig. 1); a measurement circuit (see measurement unit in para. 28) that outputs a measurement value based on a capacitance between the electrostatic sensor electrode and an indication body (para. 28, 36; wherein body is e.g. a finger); a control unit (see determination unit in para. 28) that determines, based on the measurement value output by the measurement circuit (para. 28), whether a state is a proximity state in which the indication body is in proximity to the electrostatic sensor electrode (para. 28, 36); and a storage unit (RAM, fig. 1) that stores a measurement value in a state in which the indication body is not in proximity to the electrostatic sensor electrode as a reference value (see reference value in para. 58; wherein the reference value is the parasitic capacitance value when the device is first turned on), wherein the control unit determines whether a state is the proximity state based on a first difference value obtained by subtracting the reference value from a measurement value (para. 58; wherein the reference value is subtracted from the electrostatic capacitance value to determine if a touch operation is performed; further wherein electrostatic capacitance value reads on measurement value), and when a state in which a fluctuation amount of the first difference value is smaller than a predetermined value (see operation threshold in para. 59) continues (para. 59; wherein the difference between the electrostatic capacitive value and the reference value goes lower than the operation threshold) for a predetermined time (from “(2)” to “(3)” in fig. 7A) or longer after the first difference value decreases in the proximity state (see fig. 7A; wherein from (2) to (3) the difference between the electrostatic capacitive value and the reference values decreases), updates the reference value (para. 59 and fig. 7A; wherein the reference value updates at (3)). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBIN J MISHLER whose telephone number is (571)270-7251. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN PATEL can be reached at (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBIN J MISHLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598714
LOCKING STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596453
TOUCH SENSOR AND A METHOD FOR DETECTING A USER'S TOUCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585351
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568688
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567184
VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month