Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/085,394

METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUDIO REPRODUCTION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Priority
Mar 23, 2010 — provisional 61/316,579 +9 more
Examiner
MOHAMMED, ASSAD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
445 granted / 606 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
620
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§103
71.7%
+31.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting 1. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent 11,350,231. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims in the present application are narrower than those in U.S. Patent 11,350,231. 11,350,231 17/183360 19/085394 1. A method for audio reproduction of an audio object by a playback device, the method comprising: receiving, by a receiver, the audio object and location metadata, wherein the location metadata uniquely corresponds to the audio object, and wherein the location metadata indicates a sound reproduction location of the audio object relative to a reference screen, and wherein the location metadata further includes angle information of the audio object relative to the reference screen; receiving display screen metadata, wherein the display screen metadata indicates information of a display screen of the playback device; determining, by a processor, a reproduction location for sound reproduction of the audio object relative to the display screen, wherein the reproduction location is determined based on the location metadata and the display screen metadata; and rendering, by the playback device, the audio object at the reproduction location. 1. A method for audio reproduction of an audio object using a playback device, the method comprising: receiving the audio object and audio metadata, wherein the audio metadata uniquely corresponds to the audio object, and wherein the audio metadata indicates an audio reproduction location of the audio object relative to a reference screen, and wherein the audio metadata further includes angle information of the audio object relative to the reference screen; receiving display screen metadata, wherein the display screen metadata indicates information of a display screen of the playback device, wherein the information comprises a dimension of the display screen, wherein the angle information comprises an angle relative to a reference point of the display screen; determining a reproduction location for the audio reproduction of the audio object relative to the display screen, wherein the reproduction location is determined based on the audio metadata and the display screen metadata; and rendering, using the playback device, the audio object at the reproduction location. Claim 2 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 2 of U.S. Patent 11,350,231. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims in the present application are narrower than those in U.S. Patent 11,350,231. 11,350,231 17/183360 19/085394 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the audio object is a center channel audio signal. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the audio object is a center channel audio signal. Claim 3 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 3 of U.S. Patent 11,350,231. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims in the present application are narrower than those in U.S. Patent 11,350,231. 11,350,231 17/183360 19/085394 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a plurality of other audio signals for a front left speaker, a front right speaker, a back left speaker, and a back right speaker. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a plurality of other audio signals for a front left speaker, a front right speaker, a back left speaker, and a back right speaker. Claim 4 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 6 of U.S. Patent 11,350,231. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims in the present application are narrower than those in U.S. Patent 11,350,231. 11,350,231 17/183360 19/085394 6. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a computer program that, when executed by the processor, controls an apparatus to execute the method of claim 1. 4. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a computer program that, when executed by the processor, controls an apparatus to execute the method of claim 1. Claim 5 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 9 of U.S. Patent 11,350,231. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims in the present application are narrower than those in U.S. Patent 11,350,231. 11,350,231 17/183360 19/085394 9. A playback apparatus for audio reproduction of an audio object, the playback apparatus comprising: a first receiver for receiving an audio object and location metadata, wherein the location metadata uniquely corresponds to the audio object, and wherein the location metadata indicates a sound reproduction location of the audio object relative to a reference screen, and wherein the location metadata further includes angle information of the audio object relative to the reference screen; a second receiver for receiving display screen metadata, wherein the display screen metadata indicates information of a display screen of the playback apparatus; a processor for determining a reproduction location for sound reproduction of the audio object relative to a display screen, wherein the reproduction location is determined based on the location metadata and a display screen metadata; and a renderer for rendering the audio object at the reproduction location. 5. A playback apparatus for audio reproduction of an audio object, the playback apparatus comprising one or more processors configured to perform operations comprising: receiving the audio object and audio metadata, wherein the audio metadata uniquely corresponds to the audio object, and wherein the audio metadata indicates an audio reproduction location of the audio object relative to a reference screen, and wherein the audio metadata further includes angle information of the audio object relative to the reference screen; receiving display screen metadata, wherein the display screen metadata indicates information of a display screen of the playback apparatus, wherein the information comprises a dimension of the display screen, wherein the angle information comprises an angle relative to a reference point of the display screen; determining a reproduction location for the audio reproduction of the audio object relative to the display screen, wherein the reproduction location is determined based on the audio metadata and the display screen metadata; and rendering the audio object at the reproduction location . Allowable Subject Matter 2. Claims 1-5 would be allowable if applicant is able to overcome statutory double patenting rejection set forth in this office action. 3. Claims 1-5 would be allowable upon a Terminal Disclaimer being filed to overcome the double patenting rejection(s) set forth in this office action. Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASSAD MOHAMMED whose telephone number is (571)270-7253. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASSAD MOHAMMED/Examiner, Art Unit 2691 /DUC NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12732592
VIRTUAL IMAGE VIDEO CALL METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12712984
ACTIVE DIGITAL DELEGATE FOR MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707218
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AUGMENTED ULTRASONIC AUDIO
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707228
Generating Binaural Audio in Response to Multi-Channel Audio Using at Least One Feedback Delay Network
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705020
PRIMARY-AMBIENT PLAYBACK ON AUDIO PLAYBACK DEVICES
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+11.8%)
3y 1m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month