Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/085,518

NEGATIVE PRESSURE REGULATION VALVE AND INKJET RECORDING APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Priority
Mar 28, 2024 — JP 2024-052908
Examiner
SHENDEROV, ALEXANDER D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
808 granted / 896 resolved
+30.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 896 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the JP2024-052908 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The references cited on a Form PTO 1449 have been considered. Specification The specification has been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. However, the applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Matsuyama (U.S. 2018/00001655 A1). Matsuyama discloses the following claimed limitations: Regarding independent Claim 1, a negative pressure regulation valve (10, §§0044, 0046-0048, 0088-0089 and Figs. 1, 4-5) connected to a liquid flow path (20, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5) that allows communication between a liquid reservoir portion (19, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5), which contains a liquid (IK, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5), and a liquid ejection portion (2, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5), which ejects the liquid, the negative pressure regulation valve comprising: an inflow-side pressure chamber (6, §0046 and Figs. 4-5) including a liquid inflow hole that communicates with a liquid inflow path that is the liquid flow path on a side of the liquid reservoir portion; an outflow-side pressure chamber (7, §0046 and Figs. 4-5) including a liquid outflow hole that communicates with a liquid outflow path that is the liquid flow path on a side of the liquid ejection portion; a communication hole (941, §0083 and Figs. 4-5) that allows communication between the inflow-side pressure chamber and the outflow-side pressure chamber; and a valve member (81, §§0086, 0088-0089 and Figs. 4-5) inserted in the communication hole and movable, in accordance with change of pressure inside the outflow-side pressure chamber, to a closing position for closing the communication hole and an opening position for opening the communication hole, wherein the outflow-side pressure chamber includes, as the liquid outflow hole, a first outflow hole formed below the communication hole (93, §§0046-0048 and Figs. 4-5) and a second outflow hole (92, §0080 and Figs. 4-5) formed above the communication hole, and as seen from a communication direction of the communication hole, a first line extending in an outflow direction of the liquid from the first outflow hole and a second line extending in an outflow direction of the liquid from the second outflow hole do not coincide with each other (Figs. 4-5). Regarding Claim 2, wherein the communication hole or a center of the outflow-side pressure chamber as seen from the communication direction is disposed between the first line and the second line (Figs. 4-5). Regarding Claim 3, wherein the communication hole is formed at the center of the outflow-side pressure chamber as seen from the communication direction (Figs. 4-6). Regarding Claim 4, wherein the first line and the second line, as seen from the communication direction, are not perpendicular with respect to an inner wall surface of the outflow-side pressure chamber (Figs. 4-6). Regarding Claim 5, wherein the inner wall surface of the outflow-side pressure chamber is circular-shaped as seen from the communication direction (Figs. 4-6). Regarding Claim 6, wherein a vector in the outflow direction of the first outflow hole and a vector in the outflow direction of the second outflow hole have rotation directions that coincide with each other when considered as rotation vectors with respect to the communication hole or a center position of the outflow-side pressure chamber (Figs. 4-6). Regarding Claim 7, wherein the first outflow hole and the second outflow hole are disposed at positions that are point-symmetric with respect to the center position of the outflow-side pressure chamber (Figs. 4-6). Regarding Claim 8, wherein the first outflow hole is formed at a lower end part of the outflow-side pressure chamber, and the second outflow hole is formed at an upper end part of the outflow-side pressure chamber (Figs. 4-6). Regarding Claim 9, a diaphragm portion (72, §0083 and Figs. 4-5) that constitutes part of the outflow-side pressure chamber and that is displaced by pressure change inside the outflow-side pressure chamber (§0088 and Figs. 4-5), thereby changing capacity of the outflow-side pressure chamber; and a biasing member (82, §§0086, 0088-0089 and Figs. 4-5) that biases the valve member in a direction toward the closing position, wherein the valve member is caused by displacement of the diaphragm portion and a biasing force of the biasing member to move to the closing position and the opening position (§§0088-0089 and Figs. 4-5). Regarding Claim 10, an inkjet recording apparatus (1, §0044 and Figs. 1-3), comprising: an ink container (19, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5) that contains ink (IK, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5) that is a liquid; one or more recording heads (2, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5) having a plurality of nozzles (21, §0064 and Fig. 3) that eject the ink; and the negative pressure regulation valve connected to an ink flow path (20, §0044 and Figs. 1, 4-5) between the ink container and the recording heads. Regarding Claim 11, wherein the ink flow path includes a first outflow path that communicates with the first outflow hole (Fig. 5), and a second outflow path that communicates with the second outflow hole (Fig. 5), and the first outflow path and the second outflow path communicate with the recording heads (Fig. 5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV whose telephone number is (571)270-7049. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X Rodrigues can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV/ Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /JASON S UHLENHAKE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746754
APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734819
LIQUID SUPPLY DEVICE, LIQUID JETTING SYSTEM, PRINTING SYSTEM, AND LIQUID CIRCULATION METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734812
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728653
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728644
LIQUID EJECTION HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.2%)
1y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 896 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month