Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/085,720

Cooling fan

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Priority
Mar 14, 2024 — DE 102024107338.1 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, SANG K
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Würzburg
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1461 granted / 1794 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1828
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1794 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed on 6/19/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-14 and 16-20 remain pending in the application. Claims 10-12 and 17-20 are withdrawn from consideration as non-elected. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Applicant’s Remarks filed on 6/19/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-9, 13, 14 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The Examiner acknowledges Spaggiari (U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2012/0201705) teaches ribs on the hub of the fan and not on the cover for the hub. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 U.S.C. 103. Spaggiari teaches it is intended to use in heavy-duty applications such as agricultural machines or earthmoving machines (paragraph [0008]). Spaggiari also teaches the cover is under centrifugal load and needs to be capable of expelling dirt (paragraph [0056]). Spaggiari also teaches the outer surface of the cover needs to be smooth in order to facilitate expulsion of dirt (paragraphs [0052], [0056]). A person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that mud and soil often include stones or other hard debris capable of denting the surface. Therefore, the person of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to make the cover sufficiently stiff to maintain the smoothness of the surface and endure the centrifugal load and the external loads expected while expelling mud, soil and the like. Spaggiari also teaches stiffening a structure by employing radially extending ribs (paragraphs [0104], [0105]). Applying ribs on the cover in a similar manner to the ribs in the hub would be merely a duplication or rearrangement of parts (MPEP 2144.04). Therefore, in order to strengthen the cover to withstand the expected load during operation of heavy machinery expelling mud and soil, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to modify Spaggiari’s cover to incorporate radial ribs in the manner to the ribs in the hub because, as Spaggiari teaches, the ribs stiffen a structure. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-9 and 13, 14 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Spaggiari (U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2012/0201705). As per claim 1, Spaggiari discloses a cooling fan (1), comprising: a sand prevention cover (13; figure 3) covering a hub (8) of the cooling fan; a connection structure comprising at least one positioning section, for positioning the sand prevention cover with respect to the hub , and at least one fixing section for fixing the sand prevention cover to the hub (see annotated figure 3 below), wherein the connection structure is formed as part of the sand prevention cover and as part of the hub (see annotated figure 3 below). PNG media_image1.png 534 799 media_image1.png Greyscale Spaggiari does not explicitly teach wherein the sand prevention cover includes a number of radial ribs extending between the at least one positioning section and the at least one fixing section. However, Spaggiari does teach a number of radial ribs extending between the at least one positioning section and the at least one fixing section (ribs 30 on hub 8). Spaggiari teaches it is intended to use in heavy-duty applications such as agricultural machines or earthmoving machines (paragraph [0008]). Spaggiari also teaches the cover is under centrifugal load and needs to be capable of expelling dirt (paragraph [0056]). Spaggiari also teaches the outer surface of the cover needs to be smooth in order to facilitate expulsion of dirt (paragraphs [0052], [0056]). A person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that mud and soil often include stones or other hard debris capable of denting the surface. Therefore, the person of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to make the cover sufficiently stiff to maintain the smoothness of the surface and endure the centrifugal load and the external loads expected while expelling mud, soil and the like. Spaggiari also teaches stiffening a structure by employing radially extending ribs (paragraphs [0104], [0105]). Applying ribs on the cover in a similar manner to the ribs in the hub would be merely a duplication or rearrangement of parts (MPEP 2144.04). Therefore, in order to strengthen the cover to withstand the expected load during operation of heavy machinery expelling mud and soil and maintain its smoothness, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to modify Spaggiari’s cover to incorporate radial ribs in the manner to the ribs in the hub because, as Spaggiari teaches, the radial ribs stiffen a structure. As per claim 2, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the at least one positioning section and/or the at least one fixing section are formed at an outer ring segment and/or at an inner ring segment of the hub (positioning section at the outer ring of hub 8 and fixing section at the inner ring of hub 8 as shown; see annotated figure 3 above). As per claim 3, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein one positioning section of the at least one positioning section and/or one fixing section of the at least one fixing section are formed continuously along the inner or the outer ring segment (the positioning section has ring 13b, i.e., a continuous body engaging the outer ring of hub 8; paragraph [0062]; figures 3, 6). As per claim 4, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 2, and further discloses wherein the outer ring segment and the inner ring segment are each arranged on different radial positions of the hub (as shown; figure 3). As per claim 5, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 2, and further discloses wherein the sand prevention cover covers an area between the outer ring segment and the inner ring segment (as shown, cover 13 covers between the inner ring and the outer ring; see annotated figure 3 above). As per claim 6, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the at least one fixing section and/or the at least one positioning section include at least one tongue and groove joint (as shown, ring 13b forms a tongue inserted to a groove formed by the outer ring of the cylindrical wall 12; see annotated figure 3 above). As per claim 7, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 6, and further discloses wherein the tongue and groove joint includes at least one tongue protruding in an axial direction of the cooling fan (as shown, the tongue extends in the axial direction; see annotated figure 3 above). As per claim 8, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the at least one fixing section includes at least one weld seam (cover 13 is welded to hub 8, i.e., having a weld seam; paragraph [0077]). As per claim 9, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the at least one fixing section includes at least one adhesive layer configured to fix the sand prevention cover to the hub by at least one adhesive bond (cover 13 is fastened and sealed to hub 8 by gluing cover 13 to hub 8; paragraph [0076]). As per claim 13, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the at least one positioning section and the at least one fixing section are arranged on different axial positions with respect to an axial direction of the cooling fan (positioning section at the axial end of hub 8 and connection section located at base portion 18b having different axial positions; figure 3). As per claim 14, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the sand prevention cover includes an inclined surface extending between the at least one positioning section and the at least one fixing section (cover 13, at discoidal portion 13a (located between the positioning section and the fixing section), forms a inclined surface with respect to the rotational axis R; figure 3). As per claim 16, Spaggiari discloses the cooling fan of claim 8, and further discloses wherein the at least one weld seam is formed by ultrasonic welding or hot melt welding (laser or ultrasound welding; paragraph [0077]). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE NON-FINAL because it contains new ground(s) of rejection not necessitated by Applicant’s amendment. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANG K KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-1324. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Courtney Heinle can be reached at (571)270-3508. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANG K KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 19, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746621
METHOD FOR MACHINING TOOL
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747677
INTEGRATED IN-LINE EMERGENCY LUBE PUMP ASSEMBLY FOR PLANETARY GEARBOX CONFIGURATIONS
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742438
CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A WIND TURBINE
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741840
SHEET FEEDING DEVICE AND RECORDING APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734777
A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SHELL OF A WIND TURBINE BLADE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month