Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/085,862

END EFFECTOR FOR ROBOTIC SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Priority
Apr 24, 2020 — provisional 63/015,217 +1 more
Examiner
COLEY, ZADE JAMES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Orthosoft ULC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
579 granted / 802 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
818
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 802 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8-15, 26-32, and 34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Suarez et al. (US 2011/0082462; “Suarez”). Claim 8, Suarez discloses a reamer (Fig. 6B) for shaping a bone without requiring a guide pin (Fig. 6B), the reamer comprising: a primary driveshaft (210) configured to rotate about a first axis of rotation (axis of 210); a cutting head (paragraph [0069]) coupled to a distal end (228) of the primary driveshaft (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]), the cutting head configured to rotate about a second axis of rotation (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]), laterally offset from the first axis of rotation (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]). Claim 9, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8, wherein the second axis of rotation is parallel to the first axis of rotation (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]). Claim 10, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8, wherein the orientation of the primary driveshaft is adjustable relative to the orientation of the cutting head (Fig. 6C), such that the first axis of rotation is located at an acute or an oblique angle relative to the second axis of rotation (Figs. 6b-6C; paragraph [0069]). Claim 11, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8, further comprising a motive (Fig. 6B; 200a) coupler coupled to the primary driveshaft (Fig. 6B), the motive coupler engageable with a motive source to provide rotary motion to the primary driveshaft (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]), at least a portion of the motive coupler and the primary driveshaft rotatable about the first axis of rotation (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]). Claim 12, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 11, wherein the motive source is an electric motor (could be any type of motor the motive source is not positively recited, so the coupler just needs to be capable of coupling to this type of source), the motor operable to rotate the primary driveshaft to rotate the cutting head (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]). Claim 13, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 11, wherein the motive source is a pneumatically-actuated motor (could be any type of motor the motive source is not positively recited, so the coupler just needs to be capable of coupling to this type of source), the motor operable to rotate the primary driveshaft to rotate the cutting head (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]). Claim 14, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8, further comprising a retainer (Fig. 6B; 50) connecting the primary driveshaft to an end effector (Figs. 3B and 6B) of a robotic arm (Figs. 3B and 6B), a portion of the retainer being laterally from both the end effector and the reamer (Fig.6B; the neck portion of 50 meets this limitation, for instance run an axis through the neck portion parallel to the shaft 210 axis). Claim 15, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8, further comprising a secondary driveshaft (Fig. 6B; 224) coupled to the cutting head (Fig. 6B), the secondary driveshaft rotatable about a third axis of rotation (axis defined by 224) that is not parallel to the first axis of rotation or the second axis of rotation (Fig. 6B). Claim 26, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 15, wherein the secondary driveshaft is coupled to the primary driveshaft at a first joint (Fig. 6B; 228). Claim 27, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 26, wherein the secondary driveshaft is coupled to the cutting head at a second joint (distal 228 joint). Claim 28, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8, wherein the primary driveshaft extends within a primary housing (Fig. 6B; 60). Claim 29, Suarez discloses a reamer (Fig. 6B) for shaping a bone without requiring a guide pin (Fig. 6B), the reamer comprising: a primary driveshaft (210) configured to rotate about a first axis of rotation (axis of 210); a secondary driveshaft (Fig. 6B; 224) coupled to the primary driveshaft at a first joint (Fig. 6B; 228) and configured to rotate about a second axis of rotation (axis of 224); and a cutting head (paragraph [0069]) coupled to the secondary driveshaft at a second joint (distal joint 228), the cutting head configured to rotate about a third axis of rotation (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]) laterally offset from the first axis of rotation (Fig. 6B; paragraph [0069]). Claim 30, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 29, wherein the primary driveshaft extends within a primary housing (Fig. 6B; 60). Claim 31, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 30, wherein the secondary driveshaft extends within a secondary housing (where 222 points). Claim 32, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 29, wherein the first axis of rotation and the third axis of rotation are parallel (Fig. 6B). Claim 34, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 32, wherein the second axis of rotation lies at an oblique angle (Fig. 6B; angles between the different segments) relative to at least one of the first axis of rotation or the third axis of rotation (Fig. 6B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suarez et al. (US 2011/0082462; “Suarez”), in view of Yang et al. (US 2012/0265009; “Yang”). Claim 16, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 8. However, Suarez does not disclose a camera coupled to a distal portion of the primary driveshaft. Yang teaches a cutting device (Fig. 2) further comprising a camera (Fig. 2; 66; paragraph [0039]) coupled to a distal portion of a housing of the primary driveshaft (Fig. 2; paragraph [0039]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include a camera, as taught by Yang, to the reamer of Suarez, in order to allow the user to have visualization of the worksite and get image data (paragraphs [0039], [0042], and [0048]). Claim(s) 24-25 and 33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suarez et al. (US 2011/0082462; “Suarez”), in view of Dekel et al. (US 2019/0223957; “Dekel”). Claim 24, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 15. However, Suarez does not disclose the secondary driveshaft extending perpendicular to the primary driveshaft. Dekel teaches a reamer (Figs. 5-6) comprising a secondary driveshaft (Fig. 5; 212) extending perpendicular to a primary driveshaft (220). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made how the driveshafts of Suarez connect to one another so the extend perpendicular relative to one another as taught by Dekel, since this is a well-known way to help offset the handle portion from the reaming head (Figs. 5-6) and connect driveshafts to rotate the reaming head (Figs. 5-6; paragraph [0083]). Claim 25, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 15. However, Suarez does not disclose the third axis of rotation being perpendicular to the first axis of rotation. Dekel teaches a manner of connecting driveshafts at 90 degree angles (Figs. 5-6), which makes the axis of rotations of the shafts perpendicular to one another It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the driveshaft connections of Suarez to be at 90 degree angles, as taught by Dekel, since this is a well-known way to help offset the handle portion from the reaming head (Figs. 5-6) and connect driveshafts to rotate the reaming head (Figs. 5-6; paragraph [0083]). Claim 33, Suarez discloses the reamer of claim 32. However, Suarez does not disclose the second axis of rotation being perpendicular to the third axis of rotation. Dekel teaches a manner of connecting driveshafts at 90 degree angles (Figs. 5-6), which makes the axis of rotations of the shafts perpendicular to one another It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the driveshaft connections of Suarez to be at 90 degree angles, as taught by Dekel, since this is a well-known way to help offset the handle portion from the reaming head (Figs. 5-6) and connect driveshafts to rotate the reaming head (Figs. 5-6; paragraph [0083]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Zade Coley whose telephone number is (571)270-1931. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9-5) PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong can be reached at (571)272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Zade Coley/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740816
ACTIVE COMPRESSION BONE SCREW
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733943
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ROBOTIC ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733946
SHOULDER PROSTHESIS COMPONENTS AND ASSEMBLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734047
APPARATUS FOR ALIGNING AN ACETABULAR CUP
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721663
Locking System For Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 1m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 802 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month