Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/086,382

PROJECTILE WITH TAGGING CAPABILITY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Examiner
BERGIN, JAMES S
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Insights International Holdings LLC Dba Nantrak Industries
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
792 granted / 999 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1022
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DOWN et al. (US 2018/0292184 A1). Regarding claim 1, Down et al. disclose a projectile 101 (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b; para [0039]) for attaching to a surface (surface of target 1001 – UAV), comprising: a projectile body 101, 109, 111, 113 comprising: a coupling mechanism (an adhesive or hook on the nose109- para [0053]); and an electronics component (ECM 105), the electronics component comprising a processor 119 and a communications component 117 (para [0051]). Regarding claim 2, Down et al. disclose coupling mechanism comprises at least one of adhesive, or a hook (paras [0053]; [0055]). Regarding claim 3, Down et al. disclose the coupling mechanism is disposed on a nose section 109 of the projectile (paras [0053]; [0055]). Regarding claim 5, Down et al. disclose that the electronic component includes an electronic warfare component 105 (paras [0041]; [0061]). Regarding claim 6, Down et al. disclose that the electronic warfare component comprises at least one of a jamming component, a disabling component, or a software-delivery component (paras [0041]; [0051]; [0061]). Claims 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by SAWYER et al. (US 2012/0166021 A1). Regarding claim 1, Sawyer et al. disclose a projectile for attaching to a surface (300; Fig. 7; paras [0002], [0064]), comprising: a projectile body (302; Fig. 7; para [0064]) comprising: a coupling mechanism (adhesive material 304, Fig. 7; para [0064]); and an electronics component 313 comprising GPS receiver 306, RF transponder 308, inertia or pressure switch 314, the electronics component 313 comprising a processor and a communications component (308 and 312; Fig. 7 – paras [0012], [0064]). Regarding claim 4, Sawyer et al. disclose that the electronics component includes a location component (GPS receiver 306; RF transponder 308; Fig. 7; para [0064], [0065]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DOWN et al. (US 2018/0292184 A1) in view of SAWYER et al. (US 2012/0166021 A1). Regarding claims 7 and 8, Down et al. disclose the processor is further programmed to: receive, from a sensor 117 (accelerometer or pressure sensor), a signal indicating that the projectile has attached to the surface (117; Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b; para [0063], [0064]), and transmits a signal to the processor 119 that controls activation of the ECM105. Down et al. do not specifically teach that the processor is programmed to initiate, via the communication component, transmission of information to a remote computing device. However, Sawyer discloses a projectile for attaching to a surface (300, Fig. 7; para [0002], "The present invention is directed to a tracking, sensing and/or disablement system for a moving or fixed target, typically, but not limited to a fleeing vehicle. Specifically, the present invention is directed to a system which remotely tracks a vehicle with a location module, scans the vehicle for contraband substances and/or electronically disables the vehicle'; para [0064], 'projectile 300'), comprising: a projectile body (302, Fig. 7; para [0064], The projectile comprises an outer casing 302') comprising: a coupling mechanism (304, Fig. 7; para [0064], 'Inside the casing 302 is a gelatinous adhesive compound 304 which holds a GPS receiver 306, a radio frequency (RF) transponder 308, a battery 310, an antenna 312 and an inertia or pressure switch 314 The adhesive material 304 is used to attach the chip 313 to a fleeing vehicle or target and can be any material that helps to absorb the shock generated by the firing of the launcher 200 and the impact with the target, yet also has a cure rate that ensures that the electronic chip 313 sticks to the target 102'); and an electronics component, the electronics component comprising a processor and a communications component (308, 312, 313, Fig. 7 - SCC electronics component 313 comprising a microprocessor and a communications component 308/312; para [0012], 'the tagging device comprising a tracking chip having a microprocessor, a power source, and an emitting means for emitting a tracking signal'; para[0064], Inside the casing 302 is a gelatinous adhesive compound 304 which holds a GPS receiver 306, a radio frequency (RF) transponder 308, a battery 310, an antenna 312 and an inertia or pressure switch 314. These electronic components are preferably placed on a single electronic component or chip 313'); and further teaches a sensor for detecting when the projectile has attached to the surface (314, Fig. 7 - see how the sensor/pressure/inertial switch 314 detects when the projectile has impacted and attached to the surface; para [0065], 'the electronic chip 313 is initially in an "off" position to conserve the power in the battery 310. It is connected to the pressure or inertia switch 314 which turns the chip "on" due to the force generated by the firing of the launcher 200 or the impact with the target vehicle 102'), and upon impact with the surface, the processor configured to initiate, via the communications component, transmission of information to a remote computing device (Fig. 7 - see how the processor is configured to initiate, via the communications component 308/312, transmission of location information from the GPS receiver 306 to a remote computing device; para[0065], "Once the chip 313 is turned "on," the GPS receiver 306 begins to receive signals from terrestrial satellites to determine its location and conveys that information to the RF transponder 308. The RF transponder then transmits the information to law enforcement at a central command station who track the fleeing vehicle and direct field officers to its location'). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the electronics component of the Down et al. projectile by employing a GPS receiver, transponder and antenna as taught by Sawyer et al., such that the projectile could also transmit location information upon impact with the surface, in order to have allowed for the object to be tracked and located after disabling the object. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See the attached PTO-FORM 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES S BERGIN whose telephone number is (571)272-6872. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES S BERGIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601573
METHOD AND TOOL FOR PRODUCING A BASE PIECE OF A MULTI-PART CARTRIDGE CASE, BASE PIECE AND CARTRIDGE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601575
RANGE EXTENSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584719
IMPROVED END CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584718
EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC FIREWORK IGNITER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571620
AMMUNITION PRESS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month