Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/086,456

PERSONAL CARE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Priority
Mar 21, 2024 — EU 24165194.2
Examiner
MICHALSKI, SEAN M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Braun GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
415 granted / 790 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
808
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
80.8%
+40.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 790 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 requires “a supplementary working tool such as a longhair trimmer” which is indefinite. Is the longhair trimmer mandatory or exemplary, and if the latter, how is the clause not surplusage to ‘tool.’ Claim 1 requires “a longhair trimmer” which is indefinite. What is the structural composition required to be a ‘longhair trimmer.’ If applicant intends to constrain this clause, the structure must be clear—as in—a pair of reciprocating blades with a series of teeth; not the vague “longhair trimmer.” Claim 4 requires several conflicting elements spaced by a “/” (slash). The slash is commonly used to refer to items in a list to mean OR, AND, and AND/OR. Because the elements in claim 4 conflict with each other in some or all of those constructions a less ambiguous phrasing is required for clarity. Claim 11 recites “substantially parallel to or inclined at an angle of less than 20 (degrees) or 10(degrees)” which is indefinite. Are these three different requirements or is 20 and 10 modifying ‘substantially’ somehow? The term substantially in this context is indefinite, as is the recitation of broader and narrower ranges together in a single claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 may be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. It is not certain, but apparently the prior art does not show the essential features of the claims—specifically in the personal shaver arts, the use of a single slider for the supplementary tool having a dual function: it both deploys/retracts the tool and controls the head-locking brake. The art (of record) does not show or render obvious that combination and fusion. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN M MICHALSKI whose telephone number is (571)272-6752. The examiner can normally be reached Typically M-F 6a-3:30p East Coast Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boyer Ashley can be reached at (571) 272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SEAN M. MICHALSKI Primary Examiner Art Unit 3724 /SEAN M MICHALSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661728
DEVICE FOR GRINDING AND/OR MILLING TEETH OF SAW BANDS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661814
Stamp with a cutting device and method for using a cutting device
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654344
CUTTING DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12636714
QUICK CHANGE ARBOR
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636719
Apparatus For Cutting Curved Wall Of Reactor Structure
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+13.1%)
3y 1m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 790 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month