Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/086,508

PROJECTILE DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR SUPPLIES WITH IMPACT ATTENUATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Examiner
BERGIN, JAMES S
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Insights International Holdings LLC Dba Nantrak Industries
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
792 granted / 999 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1022
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by FACCIANO et al. (US 2015/0284080 A1). Regarding claim 1, Facciano et al. disclose a projectile (Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B) for delivering supplies, comprising: a projectile body 52; a cavity 82 disposed within the projectile body; an access component 86, 88 (Fig. 4A – para [0051]) disposed on the projectile body, the access component providing access to the cavity; an electronics component 96 with a processor; at least one impact attenuation system (air bags 99 - Fig. 5B) configured to be deployed by the processor upon meeting a deployment condition (paras [0057], [0058], [0059]). Regarding claim 2, Facciano et al. disclose the deployment condition comprises falling at or below a predetermined altitude (para [0058]). Regarding claims 3 and 4, Facciano et al. disclose at least one impact attenuation system (air bags 99 - Fig. 5B – filled with an expandable gas or foam) comprising at least one bag configured to fill with a substance upon deployment (paras [0057], [0058], [0059]). Regarding claim 5, Facciano et al. disclose the air bags 99 that comprise an asymmetrical shape in Fig. 5B. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FACCIANO et al. (US 2015/0284080 A1). Facciano et al. disclose a projectile (Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B) for delivering supplies as discussed above with regard to claims 1-5. Regarding claim 6, Facciano et al. do not disclose the color of the airbags. Facciano et al. discloses that the container is a special forces replenishment vehicle (abstract; para [0003]) for dropping supplies to troops in the field. It would have been obvious to a POSITA before the effective filing date of the invention, to match the color of the Facciano et al. container to the external terrain and thereby reduce the possibility of enemy troops discovering it before the intended special forces recipients. Regarding claim 7, Facciano et al. do not disclose that the projectile comprises a 40mm projectile. However, 40mm projectiles and launch systems have been used by the military for generations. It would have been obvious to a POSITA before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify a 40mm projectile with the appropriately sized components of the Facciano et al. container, and thereby utilize the ubiquitous 40mm deployment systems. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FACCIANO et al. (US 2015/0284080 A1) in view of DIEHL BGT DEFENCE GMBH (DE 10 2009 023 388 A1). Facciano et al. disclose a projectile (Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B) for delivering supplies as discussed above with regard to claim 1. Facciano et al. do not disclose at least one arm disposed within the projectile body, wherein the at least one arm causes the projectile body to stand upon deployment. DIEHL BGT DEFENCE disclose a projectile (reconnaissance projectile; Abstract; Fig. 1) and teaches at least one arm (support elements 4; Fig. 1) disposed within the projectile body (housing 1; Para. [0027]; Fig. 1), wherein the at least one arm causes the projectile body to stand upon deployment (Para. [0028]; Figs. 2 and 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to include in the projectile of Facciano et al. at least one arm as taught by DIEHL BGT DEFENCE, in order to position and stabilize the container on the ground and enhance the ability of the troops to remove its contents in a rapid manner before being seen by the enemy. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See the attached PTO-FORM 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES S BERGIN whose telephone number is (571)272-6872. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES S BERGIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601573
METHOD AND TOOL FOR PRODUCING A BASE PIECE OF A MULTI-PART CARTRIDGE CASE, BASE PIECE AND CARTRIDGE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601575
RANGE EXTENSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584719
IMPROVED END CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584718
EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC FIREWORK IGNITER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571620
AMMUNITION PRESS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month