Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/087,345

SUBPIXEL LINE SCANNING

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Examiner
MONSHI, SAMIRA
Art Unit
2422
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Leica Biosystems Imaging Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
389 granted / 490 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
512
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 490 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-12 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 8-13, 18-20 U.S. patent Application No. 12282145. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the limitations of claims 1-12 are included in claims 8-13, 18-20 of U.S. patent Application No. 12282145 with similar or obvious wording variations (see the table below as an example). Claims of the current Application Claims of U.S. Patent Application 12282145 1. An imaging device for a slide scanning device comprising: a line scan camera comprising a two-dimensional array of pixel sensors, wherein the two- dimensional array comprises columns parallel to a first axis and rows parallel to a second axis that is orthogonal to the first axis; wherein the line scan camera is configured to successively receive a same field of view of a sample to each of a plurality of rows in the two-dimensional array provided by an objective lens ; and at least one hardware processor configured to, for each of a plurality of positions on the sample: control one or more of the position of the sample, the objective lens, and the line scan camera, such that the field of view of the sample, provided to the plurality of rows in the two-dimensional array, moves across the plurality of rows in the two-dimensional array at a non-zero angle with respect to the first axis and the second axis, such that each row in the plurality of rows senses the same field of view at an offset equal to a different fraction of a length of each pixel sensor, combine line images of the same field of view, to produce a plurality of subpixels for each of at least a subset of pixels within the line images of the same field of view, wherein the defined shape of each of the pixels is sized to generate square shaped subpixels when the line images are combined, generate an up-sampled line image of the position comprising the produced plurality of subpixels, and combine the up-sampled line images of each of the plurality of positions on the sample into an image. 8. A slide scanning device comprising: a stage which supports a microscope slide having a sample; a line scan camera comprising a two-dimensional array of pixel sensors, wherein the two-dimensional array comprises columns parallel to a first axis and rows parallel to a second axis that is orthogonal to the first axis, and wherein each of the pixel sensors has a defined elongated shape; an objective lens configures to successively provide a same field of view of the sample to each of a plurality of rows in the two-dimensional array; and at least one hardware processor configured to, for each of a plurality of positions on the sample: control one or more of the stage, the objective lens, and the line scan camera, such that the field of view of the sample, provided to the plurality of rows in the two-dimensional array, moves across the plurality of rows in the two-dimensional array at a non-zero angle with respect to the first axis and the second axis, such that each row in the plurality of rows senses the same field of view at an offset equal to a different fraction of a length of each pixel sensor, combine the line images of the same field of view to produce a plurality of subpixels for each of at least a subset of pixels within the line images of the same field of view, wherein the defined shape of each of the pixels is sized to generate square shaped subpixels when the line images are combined, generate an up-sampled line image of the position comprising the produced plurality of subpixels, and combine the up-sampled line images of each of the plurality of positions on the sample into an image. As compared and disclosed above, the limitations of claim 1 of the current Application are encompassed in claim 8 of U.S. patent Application No. 12282145 with obvious wording variations or inherent elements (such as camera). Nonetheless, the removal of said limitations from claim 1 of the current application made claim 1 a broader version of claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 12282145. Therefore, since omission of an element and its function in a combination is an obvious expedient if the remaining elements perform the same functions as before (In re Karlson (CCPA) 136 USPQ 184 (1963)), claim 1 is not patentably distinct from claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 12282145 (similar comparison would be applied for independent claims 5, and 9 of current application and claims 12 and 13 of the U.S. patent application 12282145). Claim 9 and 18 of the U.S. Patent No. 12282145 further includes the limitations of claim 2 , 6 and 10, of the current application with obvious wording variations. Claim 10 and 19 of the U.S. Patent No. 12282145 further includes the limitations of claim 3 , 7 and 11 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Claim 11 and 20 of the U.S. Patent No. 12282145 further includes the limitations of claim 4, 8 and 12 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMIRA MONSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-0995. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM-5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John W Miller can be reached at 5712727353. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMIRA MONSHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2422
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604054
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A CUSTOMIZED MEDIA ACCESS USER EXPERIENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12579625
Skin Care Auxiliary Method, Device, and Storage Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570214
MONITORING DEVICE, MONITORING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568297
CAMERA MONITORING SYSTEM DISPOSED ON A PANEL OF A VEHICLE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566494
VISUAL LINE DETECTION DEVICE AND VISUAL LINE DETECTION PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 490 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month