Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/087,494

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA COMPACTION UTILIZING HIERARCHICAL BEHAVIOR CODEBOOKS AND MISMATCH PROBABILITY ESTIMATION

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Mar 22, 2025
Priority
Nov 01, 2023 — CIP of 12/260,086
Examiner
ALSIP, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2139
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
AtomBeam Technologies Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
496 granted / 660 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitations: “encode and decode data into codewords using the codebook and one or more behaviors applicable to the data, thereby compacting the data; and return the encoded or decoded data to the source computing device.”. It is unclear how both the processes of encoding and decoding of data results in the same output: codewords. Further this limitation appears to be stating that both the encoding and decoding thereby compacts the data. It is unclear how both the encoding and decoding can compact the data. Claim 10 is the method claim to claim 1 and has the same issues. The remaining claims are rejected by virtue of their dependence on a rejected base claim. Double Patenting Due to the 112 rejection above, the claim language precludes a proper double patenting analysis at this time. After the 112 rejections have been addressed, a proper double patenting analysis will be performed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 7/23/2026 have been fully considered. The amendments have overcome the previous 112 issues, but have introduced new 112 problems which have been addressed above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL ALSIP whose telephone number is (571)270-1182. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Reginald G. Bragdon can be reached at (571)272-4204. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL ALSIP/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2139
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112, §DP
Jul 23, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704999
Completion Queue Handling By Host Controller For Storage Device
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699436
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693971
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY CONTROLLER AND CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12651151
METHOD OF OPERATING MEMORY-BASED DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12645374
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE CONCEPTION OF A COMPUTATIONAL MEMORY CIRCUIT
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+5.3%)
2y 11m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month