Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/087,759

EDDY-CURRENT FLAW DETECTION DEVICE AND EDDY-CURRENT FLAW DETECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Priority
Jan 13, 2023 — JP 2023-003840 +1 more
Examiner
MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
IHI Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
850 granted / 989 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1011
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 989 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) & (a)(2) as being anticipated by Tapia et al (U.S. PGPub # 2020/0333294). Regarding Independent claim 1, Tapia teaches: An eddy-current flaw detection device comprising: a probe configured to detect a change in eddy-current (Fig. 6 Elements 44 & 44a. See paragraph 0085.) in a component surface of an inspection object (Fig. 6 Elements 16 & 17. See paragraphs 0085-0086.); and a control unit configured to cause the probe to scan the component surface along a scanning path (Fig. 6 Element 126. See paragraph 0085.) that crosses an edge of the component surface (Fig. 6 Elements 15, 16 & 17. See paragraph 0085.); wherein the scanning path includes a first scanning path that is scanned in a first direction from a first region of the component surface adjacent to an edge region extending along the edge to a region outside the edge across the edge region (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182, 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. See paragraphs 0074-0075 & 089.), and the probe scans along the first scanning path to detect the change in eddy-current in the edge region (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. See paragraphs 0074-0075 & 089.). PNG media_image1.png 746 384 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 526 716 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Tapia teaches all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Tapia teaches the scanning path includes a second scanning path that is scanned in a second direction from the region outside the edge to the first region across the edge (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. In both figures 4 & 6 there are scanning paths along elements and between them. See paragraphs 0072, 0074-0076, 0078 & 0089.), and the probe scans along the second scanning path to detect the change in eddy-current in the first region (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. See paragraphs 0072, 0074-0076, 0078 & 0089. See also the abstract.). Regarding claim 3, Tapia teaches all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Tapia teaches a determination unit configured to determine a first region signal indicating the change in eddy-current in the first region (Fig. 6 Element 124. See paragraphs 0055, 0057-0058, 0060, 0062-0063, 0072, 0074-0076, 0078 & 0089. See also the Abstract.), wherein the first region signal includes: a first signal detected by scanning along the first scanning path and a second signal detected by scanning along the second scanning path (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. See paragraphs 0055, 0057-0058, 0063, 0072, 0074-0076, 0078 & 0089.), and the determination unit determines one of the first signal and the second signal, which has a higher intensity, as the first region signal (Fig. 6 Element 124. 0055, 0057-0058, 0060, 0062-0063, 0072, 0074-0076, 0078 & 0089. See also the Abstract.). PNG media_image3.png 524 712 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Independent claim 4, Tapia teaches: An eddy-current flaw detection method comprising: scanning (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. See paragraphs 0074-0075 & 089.) a component surface of an inspection object (Fig. 6 Elements 16 & 17. See paragraphs 0085-0086.) by a probe that detects a change in eddy-current (Fig. 6 Elements 44 & 44a. See paragraph 0085.) in the component surface along a scanning path that crosses an edge of the component surface (Fig. 6 Elements 16 & 17. See paragraphs 0085-0086.); wherein the scanning path includes a first scanning path that is scanned in the first direction from the first region of the component surface adjacent to the edge region extending along the edge toward the region outside the edge across the edge region (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. See paragraphs 0074-0075 & 089.); and the probe scans along the first scanning path to detect the change of eddy-current in the edge region (Fig. 4A & 4B Elements 182 & 188, respectively. Fig. 6 Element 212. See paragraphs 0074-0075 & 089.). PNG media_image1.png 746 384 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 563 766 media_image4.png Greyscale Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art listed but not cited represents the previous state of the art and analogous art that teaches some of the limitations claimed by applicant. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P MCANDREW whose telephone number is (469)295-9025. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lee Rodak can be reached on 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P MCANDREW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748140
RYDBERG ATOM-BASED VECTOR AND POLARIZATION SENSOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742802
POWER DETECTOR DEVICE AND POWER DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730243
APPARENT RESISTIVITY MEASURING SYSTEM AND METHOD USING SEMI-AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722497
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DIAGNOSING AN ECO-FRIENDLY VEHICLE BATTERY
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12710491
METHOD AND MEASURING APPARATUS FOR MEASURING A MAGNETIC FIELD IN A FIELD OF VIEW OF A MAGNETIC RESONANCE FACILITY
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 989 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month