Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/088,176

Docking Station and Data Transmission

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Priority
Mar 27, 2024 — CN 202410361709.8
Examiner
PHAN, DEAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Anker Innovations Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
382 granted / 516 resolved
+14.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
89.7%
+49.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 516 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 10-12, 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al (US 20200356508, Yu) in view of Lais et al (US 20110320653, Lais). As to claim 1, Yu discloses a data transmission method, comprising: obtaining, by a docking station (fig. 1, hub 102), an initial transmission mode of the docking station (par. 14 “the device role”) connected to a host device (first host 110); obtaining device information of a computing device (par. 32 “exchange of information between the host-to-host chip 120 and the second host 130”) connected to a port of the docking station (see fig. 4); and determining a data transmission mode of the port based on the initial transmission mode and the device information of the computing device (par. 19, 40. Note: The determination of host-to-host or host-to-device mode is based on the initial transmission mode in which chip 120 plays a device role and host 110 play a host role); and transmit, based on the data transmission mode of the port, data from the host device to the computing device (par. 30). Yu does not disclose the step of sending an instruction to the host device to transmit, based on the data transmission mode of the port, data from the host device to the computing device. In the same field of art (peripheral configuration), Lais discloses a method comprising receiving requests at an I/O hub from a plurality of I/O adapters (par. 6). In one embodiment, Lais further discloses the step of sending an instruction (par. 37, s603 “request” to a host device (fig. 1 host 124) to transmit data from the host device to the computing device (“response from the host system 124). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Yu and Lais, by sending an instruction to a host device to transmit, based on the data transmission mode of the port, data from the host device to the computing device. The motivation is to x of the system (Background). As to claim 2, Yu/Lais discloses the data transmission method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the data transmission mode of the port comprises: determining a device type of the computing device based on the device information of the computing device (Yu, par. 32); and determining the data transmission mode of the port based on the device type of the computing device and the initial transmission mode (par. 39). As to claim 3, Yu/Lais discloses the data transmission method according to claim 2, wherein the determining the data transmission mode of the port based on the device type of the computing device and the initial transmission mode comprises: determining an adapted transmission mode of the computing device (Yu, par. 40) based on the device type of the computing device (“iphone” or “Android”), wherein the device type of the computing device indicates that the computing device is one of a display device, a storage device, or a power adapter (Note: A smartphone is a display or storage device); and determining the data transmission mode of the port based on the adapted transmission mode and the initial transmission mode (par. 34, 35). As to claims 10-12, all the same elements of claims 1-3 are listed but in an apparatus form with one or more processors (Yu, processor 310; Lais par. 48) and memory storing instructions (Lais, par. 44). Therefore, the supporting rationale of the rejection to claims 1-3 applies equally to claims 10-12 . As to claims 19-20, all the same elements of claims 1-20 are listed but in a transitory computer-readable medium form (Lais, par. 44). Therefore, the supporting rationale of the rejection to claims 1-2 applies equally to claims 19-20. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9, 13-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEAN PHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1002. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 7:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Henry Tsai can be reached at 571-272-4176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.P/Examiner, Art Unit 2184 /HENRY TSAI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2184
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681890
DATA TRANSMISSION ON I2C BUS
5y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681875
INTER-DRIVE COMMUNICATION FOR COOPERATIVE OPERATIONS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675428
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670116
INTERFACE CONVERSION DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657137
EMULATED ENDPOINT CONFIGURATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.0%)
3y 0m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 516 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month