Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/089,031

OPERATION PULSE SIGNAL CONTROL METHOD FOR NON-VOLATILE MEMORY CELL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Priority
Apr 11, 2024 — provisional 63/632,599
Examiner
RADKE, JAY W
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
eMemory Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
738 granted / 858 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
883
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 858 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on March 25, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on November 3, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1: The claim is indefinite due to the following reasons: “setting the first sub-state value equal to the second sub-state value” is changing limitations, values, that were introduced earlier in the claim. For example, setting a value of 5 to be equal to 7 makes no sense. It may be the case that Applicant is treating claims as if they are lines of a program, wherein a variable can be set to different values during a routine. If so then Examiner suggests using a variable name without “value” being used in the name such as “first variable” and use that as a variable that can be set to be equal to the first value. “performing the step (b) again ”would mean that “the pulse” would be provided again (ie the same pulse would be provided again to the memory cell) but that would conflict with the term “next pulse”. “stopping providing the next pulse” is indefinite since the claim never claimed providing the next pulse before this. In other words there is no antecedent basis to “providing the next pulse”. Claims 2-15 depend on claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY W RADKE whose telephone number is (571)270-1622. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAY W. RADKE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2827 /JAY W. RADKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763155
ERASE SATURATION MITIGATION IN NON-VOLATILE MEMORY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755788
ADDRESS FAULT DETECTION IN A MEMORY SYSTEM
4y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12755797
ENHANCED READ RETRY (ERR) FOR DATA RECOVERY IN FLASH MEMORY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748691
MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATION THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744084
METHOD FOR READING A MULTI-LEVEL NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR A PHASE-CHANGE MEMORY DEVICE, AND MULTI-LEVEL NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 858 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month