Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/090,018

PROGRAM, PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — JP 2022-157621 +1 more
Examiner
ADAMS, CARL
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cygames Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
578 granted / 804 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
835
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
62.9%
+22.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 804 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 3, 6, 7, 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Uenishi et al. (US Pub. No. 2003/0013533 A1). As to claims 1, 10 and 11, Uenishi shows a program causing a computer to function (Fig. 1 and para. 17), an associated apparatus (Fig. 1 and para. 16) and methodology (Fig. 4 and para. 71) including: an output sound manager (i.e. CPU 1, Fig. 2 and para. 60) configured to manage management information (i.e. volume, raising time falling time, etc., Fig. 4 and paras. 69, 72 and 74) in which identification information for identifying one or multiple output sounds (i.e. cheering, output sound A, output sound B, etc., Fig. 3 and para. 69) being output at a current time point (t1, t5, etc. Fig. 3 and para. 69) and information indicating an output start timing of each of the one or multiple output sounds are associated with each other (i.e. configuring rising/falling rates, Figs. 3 and 4 and paras. 69, 72 and 74); a caller (i.e. CPU 1/voice data reading section 101) configured to call an event of controlling the output sound (Figs. 2 and 3 and paras. 65 and 69); a determination unit (i.e. CPU 1/output instructing section 102) configured to, based on the event, determine the output sound to be newly output (Figs. 2 and 3 and paras. 66 and 69); a calculator (i.e. CPU 1/volume instructing section 103) configured to, based on the event, calculate details of volume adjustment to be performed for each of the one or multiple output sounds being output at the current time point (i.e. adjust relative volume, Figs. 2 and 4 and paras. 67 and 69), based on a time difference between the output start timing of each of the one or multiple output sounds being output at the current time point and the current time point (i.e. configuring rising/falling rates, Figs. 3 and 4 and paras. 69, 72 and 74); and an output sound controller (volume controlling section 111) configured to output the output sound determined to be newly output (Figs. 2 and 3 and paras. 68 – 70), and adjust each of the one or multiple output sounds being output at the current time point, based on the calculated details of the volume adjustment (Figs. 2 and 3 and paras. 68 – 70). As to claim 2, Uenishi shows that the output sound manager registers the identification information and the output start timing of the output sound determined to be newly output with the management information (Fig. 2 and paras. 60 – 70). As to claim 3, Uenishi shows that the calculator calculates a decrease amount of the volume, based on the time difference (Fig. 3 and para. 77), and the calculator calculates a larger decrease amount as the time difference increases (Fig. 3 and para. 77). As to claim 6, Uenishi shows a method of calculating the details of the volume adjustment is different for each event (Fig. 3 and para. 77). As to claim 7, Uenishi shows that the output sound controller continues control of adjusting each of the one or multiple output sounds being output at the current time point based on the details of the volume adjustment up to a time point at which a predetermined time has elapsed since a time point at which the control is started, and cancels the control after the predetermined time has elapsed (i.e. a duration of the pre-recorded sound effect, Figs. 2 and 3 and paras. 68 – 70). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 8 and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. CONCLUSION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARL ADAMS whose telephone number is (571)270-7448. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARL ADAMS/Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748312
HEAD MOUNTABLE DISPLAY AND LIGHT SEAL MASK
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748516
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737044
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROLLER DISPLAY METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738225
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725586
Display System and Method of Operation
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+16.3%)
2y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 804 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month