Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/090,156

INTRA BLOCK COPY PREDICTION WITH ASYMMETRIC PARTITIONS AND ENCODER-SIDE SEARCH PATTERNS, SEARCH RANGES AND APPROACHES TO PARTITIONING

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Priority
Jan 17, 2014 — provisional 61/928,970 +5 more
Examiner
NASRI, MARYAM A
Art Unit
2483
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
346 granted / 470 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
498
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 470 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is a response to an Amendment filed on 06/24/2026, in which claims 2-21 are pending and ready for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/24/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 03/16/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of Patent No. 11,284,103, Patent No. 11,979,601, Co-pending Application No. 19/090,180, Co-pending Application No. 19/090,204, and Co-pending Application No. 19/090,225 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With regards to claim 17, the body of the claim recites method steps for video coding, but the preamble recites that the non-transitory computer readable medium having programmed thereon encoded data as a part of the bitstream... usable to cause a decoder to perform the video coding. It is not clear whether or not the CRM contains instructions to perform the coding operations. Clarification of the claim language is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-16 are allowed over the prior art of record. Claims 18-21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 2 and 12 are allowed because the current prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to teach or reasonably suggest all the claimed features of claims 2 and 12, structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claims. More specifically, the prior art on record fails to teach or suggest the limitations of: “constraining values of vectors for intra block copy ("BC") prediction to have integer-sample precision and to indicate reference regions that are within the given slice, within the given tile, and not overlapping the current 2Nx2N block within the frame; asymmetrically partitioning the current 2Nx2N block into first and second partitions for intra BC prediction by splitting the current 2Nx2N block horizontally or vertically into the first and second partitions, the first and second partitions having dimensions of 2Nx(N/2) and 2Nx(3N/2), respectively, or (N/2)x2N and (3N/2)x2N, respectively; performing intra BC prediction for the first partition; and performing intra BC prediction for the second partition; and outputting the encoded data as part of a bitstream” cited in claim 2. Claim 12 claims features similar to the ones claimed in claim 2. Thus, the mentioned limitation in combination with all other limitations of the claim has been found allowable. Claims 2 and 12 are allowed and all claims dependent on claims 2 and 12 are allowed as well. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARYAM A NASRI whose telephone number is (571)270-7158. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00-8:00 M-T. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached on 5712727383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARYAM A NASRI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750519
ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744893
Displacement Vector Coding with Decoder-side Prediction
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739396
MOVING PICTURE CODING METHOD, MOVING PICTURE CODING APPARATUS, MOVING PICTURE DECODING METHOD, MOVING PICTURE DECODING APPARATUS, AND MOVING PICTURE CODING AND DECODING APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732619
Method and Apparatus of Decoder-Side Motion Vector Refinement and Bi-Directional Optical Flow for Video Coding
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718066
TIME SERIES PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR ESTIMATING METRIC FOR A GIVEN ENTITY
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 470 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month