Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/090,363

MOUNTING APPARATUS AND IMAGING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Priority
Mar 26, 2024 — JP 2024-049440
Examiner
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1489 granted / 1843 resolved
+28.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1880
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§102
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§112
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1843 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with: 37 CFR 1.83(a) because they fail to show features corresponding to the following claim limitations: Claim 5: engaging portions 21a pressing the accessory device Claim 6: biasing portion 30a provided between a plurality of first inclined surface portions 26 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: 4. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1, 10 & 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lecoeut, US 3,682,069. Lecoer discloses an imaging apparatus 1 having a mounting apparatus comprising: a first ring member 3 that engages (see Fig. 2) with an accessory device 7-9 (see also “rigid assembly” at col. 2, line 30) in a case where the accessory device is mounted; a locking member 6 that is rotatably supported, presses the first ring member engaging (see “contact” at col. 2, line 58) with the accessory device in an optical axis direction (see arrow in Fig. 1) of the accessory device to lock (see “locked” at col. 2, line 63) the accessory device in a case where the locking member is rotated in a first direction (see “screwing in” at col. 1, line 21 and “screwed home” at col. 2, lines 50-51 & 65), and releases the pressing in a case where the locking member is rotated in a second direction (see “screwing . . . out ” at col. 1, line 21); and a pin member 10 that is movable in the optical axis direction and engages with the accessory device (see Fig. 1). Claims 1-4 & 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Iinuma, US 2021/0200067. Iinuma discloses an imaging apparatus 100 having a mounting apparatus 800 comprising: a first ring member 400 that engages (see Fig. 10) with an accessory device 200 in a case where the accessory device is mounted; a locking member 500 that is rotatably (see paragraph 0045) supported, presses the first ring member engaging with the accessory device in an optical axis direction (see paragraph 0043) of the accessory device to lock (see “fixing” at paragraph 0007) the accessory device in a case where the locking member is rotated in a first direction 950, and releases the pressing in a case where the locking member is rotated in a second direction 960, wherein the first ring member includes a plurality of first inclined surface portions 406 of which thicknesses in the optical axis direction change, the locking member includes a plurality of second inclined surface portions 508 of which thicknesses in the optical axis direction change, and in a case where the locking member is rotated in the first direction, the second inclined surface portion overlaps the first inclined surface portion along a radial direction of the locking member, so that the locking member is pressed in the optical axis direction (see paragraphs 0046-0047), wherein each of the first inclined surface portion and the second inclined surface portion is provided at three locations (see paragraph 0048 and Figs. 5B-6A), wherein in a case where the locking member is rotated in the first direction, a start point portion of the second inclined surface portion rotates while pressing against the first inclined surface portion, the thickness of which increases in the first direction (see paragraph 0048 & Figs. 8A-8B), wherein a biasing portion 604 that biases the accessory device engaging with the first ring member, wherein the biasing portion is provided between a plurality of first inclined surface portions 406 in the first ring member, the thicknesses of which vary in the optical axis direction. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-9 & 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Greg Binda whose telephone number is (571)272-7077. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 et. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Greg Binda/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747760
STROKING AND ARTICULATING CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT ASSEMBLY
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747761
TORQUE LIMITER, TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING SAID TORQUE LIMITER
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747759
TRIPOD TYPE CONSTANT VELOCITY UNIVERSAL JOINT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738884
CONNECTION SYSTEM OF A TRANSMISSION ROD FOR SOLAR TRACKERS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736088
TRIPOD TYPE CONSTANT VELOCITY UNIVERSAL JOINT
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1843 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month