Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/090,423

Signaling Designs For UHR Transmissions In Wireless Communications

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 26, 2025
Priority
Mar 27, 2024 — provisional 63/570,309 +2 more
Examiner
SHAHNAMI, AMIR
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
377 granted / 459 resolved
+24.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 459 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-21 are pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim under US PRO 63/570309 filed on 3/27/2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 7, 9, 14, 19, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fang et al, US 2025/0141511 A1. Regarding Claim 1, Fang discloses a wireless communication method, comprising: performing, by a processor of an apparatus, a wireless communication with a physical-layer protocol data unit (PPDU) by either: generating and transmitting the PPDU; or receiving and processing the PPDU (Fang [0061] – the PHY circuitry 704 may be configured to transmit a HE PPDU; [0034]- the radio architecture 100 may be configured for high-efficiency (HE) Wi-Fi (HEW) communications in accordance with the IEEE 802.11ax standard). Regarding Claim 2, Fang discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein a bit 19 (B19) of a User field for a non-multi-user multiple-input-multiple-output (non-MU-MIMO) allocation in an Ultra-High- Reliability SIGNAL (UHR-SIG) field of the PPDU indicates whether unequal modulation (UEQM) or equal modulation (EQM) is applied in the PPDU (Fang [0158] – The wireless devices encode the MCS field in non-MU-MIMO user field, MU-MIMO user field, an UHR MU PPDU user field, and an UHR user information (info) field in the trigger frame; [0159] – The UEQM pattern field will be in a non-MU-MIMO user field and in an UHR MU PPDU). Regarding Claim 3, Fang discloses the method of Claim 2, wherein, responsive to the B19 indicating that the UEQM is applied, bits 20 and 21 (B20-B21) of the User field for the non-MU-MIMO allocation indicate UEQM patterns, and the UEQM patterns are indicated depending on a corresponding number of spatial streams indicated in a NSS field in the User field for non-MU-MIMO allocation (Fang [0165] – The NSS 1108 subfield (NSS/Modulation patterns) is bits 1102 B16-B18 and indicates the number of spatial streams (NSS) and supports up to 8 spatial streams as in VHT/IEEE 802.11be). Regarding Claim 4, Fang discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein a number of bits for a User field for a non-MU-MIMO allocation in a UHR-SIG field in the PPDU is 23 (Fang [0171] – FIG. 12 illustrates a UHR user field 1200, in accordance with some embodiments. In some embodiments, the total number of bits 1202 is for the non-MU MIMO user field (such as UHR user field 1200) will be increased to be 23 or 24 bits). Regarding Claim 6, Fang discloses the method of Claim 4, wherein bit 22 (B22) in the User field for the non- MU-MIMO allocation in the UHR-SIG field is used to indicate whether LDPC codeword length for the PPDU is 2x1944, wherein, when the bit B22 is set to 1, it indicates the LDPC codeword length is 2x1944, and wherein, when the bit B22 is set to 0, it indicates the LDPC codeword length is less and other than 2x1944 (see Fang [0170], [0176], [0177], Table2). Regarding Claim 7, Fang discloses the method method of Claim 4, wherein bit 21 (B21) set to 0 and bit 22 (B22) set to 1 in the User field for the non-MU-MIMO allocation in the UHR-SIG field indicates a new coding mode other than a BCC mode and an LDPC mode with codeword length less or equal to 2x1944 is used for the PPDU (see Fang [0169], [0170]). Regarding Claim 9, Fang discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein a number of bits for a User field for a MU-MIMO allocation in a UHR-SIG field in the PPDU is 23 (Fang [0171] – FIG. 12 illustrates a UHR user field 1200, in accordance with some embodiments. In some embodiments, the total number of bits 1202 is for the non-MU MIMO user field (such as UHR user field 1200) will be increased to be 23 or 24 bits). Regarding Claim 14, Fang discloses a wireless communication method, comprising: performing, by a processor of an apparatus, a wireless communication with a trigger frame by either: generating and transmitting the trigger frame; or receiving and processing the trigger frame, wherein the trigger frame is used to solicit a trigger-based (TB) PPDU ([0064] – There may be different types of PPDUs that may have different fields and different physical layers and/or different media access control (MAC) layers. For example, a single user (SU) PPDU, downlink (DL) PPDU, multiple-user (MU) PPDU, extended-range (ER) SU PPDU, and/or trigger-based (TB) PPDU; [0209] – The method 2000 begins at operation 2002 with decoding, from an access point (AP), a first physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU) comprising a user information field for a trigger frame). Regarding Claim 19, Fang discloses the method of Claim 14, wherein a bit in a UHR User Info field in the trigger frame is used to indicates whether LDPC codeword length is 2x1944 for the TB PPDU, wherein when the bit is set to 1, it indicates the LDPC codeword length is 2x1944, and when the bit is set to 0, it indicates the LDPC codeword length is less and other than 2x1944 (Fang [0169] – B21 is set to 1 if LDPC with codeword length up to 1944 is used. In some embodiments, a codeword with length of 3888 will not be used for an RU or a MRU with size smaller than or equal to 242-tone; [0170] – In some embodiments, BSS is not supported. B21 is set to 0 if LDPC with codeword length up to 3888 is used. And B21 is set to 1 if LDPC with codeword length up to 1944 is used). Regarding Claim 20, Fang discloses the method of Claim 19, the bit is bit 26 (B26) in a UHR User Info field in the trigger frame (Fang [0158] – an UHR user information (info) field in the trigger frame). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fang, in view of Hu et al, US 2022/0255690 A1. Regarding Claim 15, Fang discloses the method of Claim 14, as outlined above. However, Fang does not teach bits 56-59 (B56-B59) in a UHR Common Info field of the trigger frame are used as 4-bit bitmap, with each bit of the 4-bit bitmap indicating a respective 80-MHz frequency subblock being used as a distributed-tone resource unit (DRU) or a regular resource unit (RRU). Hu teaches bits 56-59 (B56-B59) in a UHR Common Info field of the trigger frame are used as 4-bit bitmap, with each bit of the 4-bit bitmap indicating a respective 80MHz frequency subblock being used as a distributed-tone resource unit (DRU) or a regular resource unit (RRU) (Hu [0095] – the indication may be signaled by using one or more reserved bits in a Common Information field of the trigger frame. In some implementations, the indication may include a bitmap of up to 4 bits (with 1 bit per 80 MHz subblock) indicating a RU type per 80 MHz segment or frequency subblock as being dRU or rRU). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify Fang to have a UHR Common Info field of the trigger frame used as 4-bit bitmap, with each bit of the 4-bit bitmap indicating a respective 80-MHz frequency subblock being used as a distributed-tone resource unit (DRU) or a regular resource unit (RRU), as taught by Hu. One would be motivated as the UHR common info field applies a uniform standard for each subblock. Regarding Claim 16, Fang, in combination, further discloses the method of Claim 15, wherein bits 27-31 (B27-31) in a UHR User Info field in the trigger frame are used as a SS Allocation field (Fang [0142] – this information is indicated in an SS allocation field of a trigger frame in UHR/Wi-Fi 8/IEEE 802.11bn). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 8, 10-13, 17, 18 and 21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMIR SHAHNAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-0707. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached at 571-272-7383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMIR SHAHNAMI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764345
REDUCING BLOCKINESS FOR CODECS
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12739392
QUANTIZATION PARAMETER CODING
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739409
LUMA MAPPING WITH CHROMA SCALING ADAPTATION PARAMETER SET IN VIDEO CODING
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725432
OBJECT DETECTION DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726619
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING AN IMAGE BASED ON IN-LOOP FILTER
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 459 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month