Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/091,440

PHASE CANCELLING CIRCUIT IN MULTI-LAYER PIEZOELECTRIC SUBSTRATE SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE WITH INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2025
Priority
Apr 08, 2024 — provisional 63/631,103 +3 more
Examiner
TRA, ANH QUAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Skyworks Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
823 granted / 1129 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1167
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1129 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Goto et al. (US 20170099043), cited by Applicant, hereinafter US ‘043, in view of Go to et al. (US 20230006125), hereinafter US ‘125. As o claim 1, US ’043’s figure 4A shows a filter comprises plurality of resonators (see figures 7-20) and phase cancelling circuit (400) arranged support substrate 510 (figure 16). The figure fails to show that the resonators and phase cancelling circuit are arranged on a piezoelectric layer. However, US ‘125’s figure shows a similar device that its resonators and phase cancelling circuit are arranged on piezoelectric layer (figures 1 and 25A-25B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to arrange US ‘043’ resonators and phase cancelling circuit on a piezoelectric layer for the purpose of reducing insertion loss. Thus, the modified US ‘043 shows a multi-layer piezoelectric substrate surface acoustic wave device comprising: a multi-layer piezoelectric substrate including a support substrate (510 or US ‘125’s 10) and a piezoelectric layer (US ‘125’s 12); a filter circuit including a plurality of resonators (figures 7-20) in electrical communication with the piezoelectric layer; a phase cancelling circuit (410-430 in 400) integrated with the filter circuit; and a pair of acoustic obstruction structures [(462,464), (466, 468), (472, 474), (410,430), or (482, 484) in figures 3A-3E. ¶0075 also teaches “ It is to be appreciated that, although the acoustic absorber 472 or the floating electrode 474 is depicted only as one-sided arrangement with respect to the first to third IDT electrodes 410, 420, 430, a two-sided arrangement can be configured with respect to the first to third IDT electrodes 410, 420, 430, such that two acoustic absorbers 472 are used or alternatively, two floating electrodes 474”] including a first acoustic obstruction structure and a second acoustic obstruction structure positioned such that the phase cancelling circuit is located between the pair of acoustic obstruction structures along an acoustic track of the phase cancelling circuit. As to claim 2, US ‘043’s figures show that the first acoustic obstruction structure and the second acoustic obstruction structure include different structures (figure 3C). As to claim 3, US ‘043’s figures show that the first acoustic obstruction structure includes a metal line having a reflection surface angled non-perpendicular with a wave propagation direction of the phase cancelling circuit (figure 3B). As to claim 4, piezoelectric material comprising elastic material is well known in the art. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to include elastic material in the piezoelectric layer for the purpose achieving optimum performance, i.e., achieving desired piezoelectric coefficient. As to claim 5, US ‘043’s figures show that the first acoustic obstruction structure includes an angled electrical connection line that is angled non-perpendicular with a wave propagation direction of the phase cancelling circuit (figure 3E). As to claim 6, US ‘125 uses trench 61in figures 25A and 25B as acoustic obstruction structure (¶0161). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to use trench for US ‘043’s acoustic obstruction structures for the purpose of achieving optimum performance. As to claim 7, US ‘043’s figures show that the first acoustic obstruction structure includes a reflector (figure 3A). As to claim 8, US ‘043’s figure 22 shows a second filter circuit (one of filters 30 is the first filter circuit and another one of the filters 30 is the second filer circuit, see figures 4A-4B) including a second plurality of resonators in electrical communication with the piezoelectric layer, and a second phase cancelling circuit integrated with the second filter circuit (figures 4A-4B show that each filter 30 comprise its own phase cancelling circuit 400). As to claim 9, US ‘430’s figure 4A shows that the filter circuit includes a transmit filter connected to an antenna and a receive filter connected to the antenna. As to claim 10, US ‘043’s figure 4A shows that the phase cancelling circuit is electrically connected between a transmit port of the transmit filter and the antenna and between a receive port of the receive filter and the antenna. Claims 11-20 recite similar limitations in claims above. Therefore, they are rejected for the same reasons. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH-QUAN TRA whose telephone number is (571)272-1755. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri from 8:00 A.M.-5:00 P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUAN TRA/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750260
OPTIMIZING TRANSMITTER SETTINGS FOR IN-BAND ELECTRICAL INTERFACE BETWEEN HOST DEVICE AND OPTICAL MODULE USING OUT-OF-BAND ELECTRICAL INTERFACE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744146
LC FILTER, MULTIPLEXER, HIGH FREQUENCY MODULE, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732166
Match-Slave Latch with Skewed Clock
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732154
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12719450
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICES AND MODULES WITH ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICES
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+5.3%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month