Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/092,549

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM SIGNAL, COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 27, 2025
Examiner
SUBEDI, DEEPROSE D
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 515 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 515 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . All the claims have been examined on the basis of the merit of the claims. Priority The present application is a continuation of PCT/CN2023128995 filed 11/01/2023 which claims foreign priority benefits from CN202310171555 filed in China on 02/20/2023. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/27/2025, 12/15/2025 & 12/15/2025 are considered and attached. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1,10 and 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Laszlo et al., (US-20190294243-A1, hereinafter as Laszlo). In regards to claims 1, 13-14, Laszlo discloses a computer device, comprising: a processor; and a memory configured to store computer-readable instructions of the processor, the processor being configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to cause the computer device to perform, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, having computer-readable instructions stored therein, the computer-readable instructions, when executed by a processor, implementing (fig.1, para 0091, computer device comprising processing module 120 which includes one or more computer processors programmed to process the EEG signal) a method for processing an electroencephalogram signal executed by a computer device (method according to fig.9 which is executed by the computer device as shown in fig.1 which processes an electroencephalogram signal), comprising: acquiring an electroencephalogram signal, the electroencephalogram signal comprising an electroencephalogram signal data segment of a specified duration (fig. 9, receives EEG signal from a sensor coupled to a user step 910, the EEG signals being acquired over a period, fig. 8, in which the user selects an action from a plurality of possible actions); determining a plurality of time nodes in the electroencephalogram signal data segment according to a preset time interval (step 920 extracts at least one first segment from each of the EEG signals that precedes a moment when the user selects the action. Each segment is understood as corresponding to a time node. The plurality of first segment from each of the EEG signals corresponds to plurality of time nodes (understood as time periods)); predicting an action intention corresponding to each time node based on the electroencephalogram signal data segment to obtain action intention prediction results respectively corresponding to the plurality of time nodes; and determining a target action intention according to the action intention prediction results (step 925, provide at least the first segments from each of the EEG signals…. to predict the selected action). In regard to claim 10, Laszlo discloses the method for processing an electroencephalogram signal according to claim 1, further comprising: performing filtering processing on the action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node in the electroencephalogram signal data segment to obtain a filtered action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node in the electroencephalogram signal data segment (step 240 of fig. 2, clean the amplified signals in real time using machine learning module, thereby generating filtered signals); the determining a target action intention according to the action intention prediction results respectively corresponding to the plurality of time nodes comprising: determining a target action intention of a target object according to the filtered action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node (fig.11,step 1130, generates an output associated with the predicted action). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2-9, 11-12 and 15-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. In regard to claim 2, Laszlo discloses the method for processing an electroencephalogram signal according to claim 1, Laszlo does not disclose wherein the predicting an action intention corresponding to each time node based on the electroencephalogram signal data segment to obtain action intention prediction results respectively corresponding to the plurality of time nodes comprises: performing feature extraction on the electroencephalogram signal data segment to obtain a first electroencephalogram feature; dividing the first electroencephalogram feature into a plurality of first electroencephalogram feature segments according to the plurality of time nodes, and performing feature extraction on the plurality of first electroencephalogram feature segments to obtain a second electroencephalogram feature; and performing action intention prediction according to the second electroencephalogram feature to obtain an action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node in the electroencephalogram signal data segment. Claims 3-5 depend on claim 2. In regard to claim 6, Laszlo discloses the method for processing an electroencephalogram signal according to claim 1, Laszlo does not disclose further comprising: acquiring a sample electroencephalogram signal of a known action intention; determining a plurality of sample time nodes in the sample electroencephalogram signal according to the preset time interval, and generating an action intention label corresponding to each sample time node according to the known action intention; performing feature extraction and mapping processing on the sample electroencephalogram signal through a prediction model to obtain an action prediction result corresponding to each sample time node in the sample electroencephalogram signal; and updating model parameters of the prediction model according to the action prediction result and the action intention label to obtain an action intention prediction model, wherein the action intention prediction model is configured to perform action intention prediction on the electroencephalogram signal data segment, or the action intention prediction model is configured to perform time node division and action intention prediction on the electroencephalogram signal data segment. Claims 7-9 depend on claim 6. In regard to claim 11, Laszlo discloses the method for processing an electroencephalogram signal according to claim 1, Laszlo does not disclose wherein the determining a target action intention according to the action intention prediction results respectively corresponding to the plurality of time nodes comprises: identifying an action intention prediction result corresponding to a time node closest to a current time of the plurality of time nodes as the target action intention. Claim 12 depends on claim 11. In regard to claim 15, Laszlo discloses the computer-readable storage medium according to claim 14, , Laszlo does not disclose wherein the predicting an action intention corresponding to each time node based on the electroencephalogram signal data segment to obtain action intention prediction results respectively corresponding to the plurality of time nodes comprises: performing feature extraction on the electroencephalogram signal data segment to obtain a first electroencephalogram feature; dividing the first electroencephalogram feature into a plurality of first electroencephalogram feature segments according to the plurality of time nodes, and performing feature extraction on the plurality of first electroencephalogram feature segments to obtain a second electroencephalogram feature; and performing action intention prediction according to the second electroencephalogram feature to obtain an action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node in the electroencephalogram signal data segment. Claims 16-18 depend on claim 15. In regard to claim 19, Laszlo discloses the computer-readable storage medium according to claim 14, Laszlo does not disclose the method further comprising: acquiring a sample electroencephalogram signal of a known action intention; determining a plurality of sample time nodes in the sample electroencephalogram signal according to the preset time interval, and generating an action intention label corresponding to each sample time node according to the known action intention; performing feature extraction and mapping processing on the sample electroencephalogram signal through a prediction model to obtain an action prediction result corresponding to each sample time node in the sample electroencephalogram signal; and updating model parameters of the prediction model according to the action prediction result and the action intention label to obtain an action intention prediction model, wherein the action intention prediction model is configured to perform action intention prediction on the electroencephalogram signal data segment, or the action intention prediction model is configured to perform time node division and action intention prediction on the electroencephalogram signal data segment. In regard to claim 20, Laszlo discloses the computer-readable storage medium according to claim 14, Laszlo does not disclose wherein the action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node in the electroencephalogram signal data segment comprises a probability that the action intention corresponding to each time node is a preset action, and the method further comprises: acquiring a maximum probability value in the action intention prediction result corresponding to each time node; using a preset action corresponding to the maximum probability value corresponding to each time node as an action intention label corresponding to each time node when a minimum value of maximum probability values respectively corresponding to the plurality of time nodes is greater than or equal to a preset probability threshold; and adding an electroencephalogram signal with the action intention label to a historical data set, the historical data set being configured for training the action intention prediction model. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEEPROSE SUBEDI whose telephone number is (571)270-7977. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KE XIAO can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEEPROSE SUBEDI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 29, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578830
TOUCH STRUCTURE, TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572237
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE AND TOUCH DRIVING CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12572247
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SUBSTRATE, CIRCUIT LAYER, AND LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT LAYER ON THE CIRCUIT LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561054
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UNLOCKING BASED ON USER INPUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562099
LIGHT EMITTING MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.4%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 515 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month