Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/092,636

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POWER EFFICIENT IMAGE ACQUISITION USING SINGLE PHOTON AVALANCHE DIODES (SPADS)

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 27, 2025
Priority
May 28, 2021 — continuation of 11/988,835 +1 more
Examiner
SPINKS, ANTOINETTE T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
669 granted / 928 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
958
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
81.9%
+41.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 928 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 – 20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,320,981. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims in the instant application overlap in scope with the claims in patent 12,9320,981 but the conflicting claims cannot be said to anticipate the examined claims. Instant Application Patent ‘981 Differences 1. One or more hardware storage devices that store instructions that are executable by one or more processors of a system to configure the system to: capture, using an image sensor comprising a plurality of image sensing pixels, a plurality of partial image frames including at least a first partial image frame and a second partial image frame, the first partial image frame being captured at a first timepoint using a first subset of image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor, the second partial image frame being captured at a second timepoint using a second subset of image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor, the second subset of image sensing pixels comprising different image sensing pixels than the first subset of image sensing pixels, the second timepoint being temporally subsequent to the first timepoint; generate aligned partial image frames by using motion data associated with the image sensor to spatially align the first partial image frame captured using the first subset of image sensing pixels with the second partial image frame captured using the second subset of image sensing pixels; and generate a composite image frame by compositing each of the aligned partial image frames with one another. 1.A method for power efficient image acquisition, the method comprising: capturing, using an image sensor comprising a plurality of image sensing pixels, a plurality of partial image frames including at least a first partial image frame and a second partial image frame, the first partial image frame being captured at a first timepoint using a first subset of image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor, the second partial image frame being captured at a second timepoint using a second subset of image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor, the second subset of image sensing pixels comprising different image sensing pixels than the first subset of image sensing pixels, the second timepoint being temporally subsequent to the first timepoint; generating aligned partial image frames by using motion data associated with the image sensor to spatially align the first partial image frame captured using the first subset of image sensing pixels with the second partial image frame captured using the second subset of image sensing pixels; and generating a composite image frame by compositing each of the aligned partial image frames with one another. Instant application is hardware storage device; ‘981 is a method. The dependent claims 2 - 12 have the same differences. 13. One or more hardware storage devices that store instructions that are executable by one or more processors of a system to configure the system to: obtain a runtime conditions measurement; and in response to the runtime conditions measurement, selectively activate a pixel subset image acquisition mode for image acquisition, wherein the pixel subset image acquisition mode configures a system to utilize a subset of image sensing pixels of a plurality of image sensing pixels arranged in a pixel array of an image sensor to capture image frames, the subset of image sensing pixels comprising fewer than all image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor. 13. A method for power efficient image acquisition, the method comprising: obtaining a runtime conditions measurement; and in response to the runtime conditions measurement, selectively activating a pixel subset image acquisition mode for image acquisition, wherein the pixel subset image acquisition mode configures a system to utilize a subset of image sensing pixels of a plurality of image sensing pixels arranged in a pixel array of an image sensor to capture image frames, the subset of image sensing pixels comprising fewer than all image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor. Instant application is hardware storage device; ‘981 is a method. The dependent claims 13 - 17 have the same differences. 19. One or more hardware storage devices that store instructions that are executable by one or more processors of a system to configure the system to: capture, using an image sensor comprising a plurality of image sensing pixels, an image frame using a subset of image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor while refraining from utilizing remaining image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels to capture the image frame; and generate an output image frame by performing super-resolution processing on the image frame, wherein the output image frame comprises a higher image resolution than the image frame, wherein the super-resolution processing refrains from utilizing (i) image data captured by the remaining image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels and (ii) image data captured by a second image sensor. 19. A method for power efficient image acquisition, the method comprising: capturing, using an image sensor comprising a plurality of image sensing pixels, an image frame using a subset of image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels of the image sensor while refraining from utilizing remaining image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels to capture the image frame; and generating an output image frame by performing super-resolution processing on the image frame, wherein the output image frame comprises a higher image resolution than the image frame, wherein the super-resolution processing refrains from utilizing (i) image data captured by the remaining image sensing pixels of the plurality of image sensing pixels and (ii) image data captured by a second image sensor. Instant application is hardware storage device; ‘981 is a method. The dependent claim 20 have the same differences. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTOINETTE SPINKS whose telephone number is (571)270-3749. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTOINETTE T SPINKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684233
ACCESSORY APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663608
LENS BARREL AND CONTROL APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666131
IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666141
PHOTODETECTION APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656717
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+20.1%)
2y 9m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 928 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month