Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/092,713

BASE ASSEMBLIES FOR KNOB ON DISPLAY DEVICES AND RELATED SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 27, 2025
Examiner
ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Atmel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
52%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allow Rate
184 granted / 448 resolved
-20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
64.1%
+24.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 448 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/27/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 7-8, 11, 13-16, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ballan et al. (US Patent Pub 2020/0073487; hereinafter Ballan) in view of Okuzumi et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2017/0052617; hereinafter Okuzumi). With reference to claim 1, Ballan discloses a knob on display device (1), comprising: a conductive cap (12/121), the conductive cap at a top of the knob on display device (1) (see paragraphs 31-32; Figs. 1-4); a dome switch (19), the dome switch under the conductive cap (121), the dome switch (19) electrically connected to a touch surface (121) of the conductive cap (12) (see paragraph 37; Figs. 7-8); a printed circuit including conductive pads (15), the conductive pads (15) including one or more dome switch pads (19), the dome switch (19) mounted on the one or more conductive pads (15) (see paragraphs 22, 37; Figs. 7-8); an inner housing (11), the inner housing between the conductive cap (121) and the mounting structure (13), the inner housing enabled to rotate about a post (hollow recess/16) within the mounting structure (13) (see paragraphs 25-26, 28; Figs. 3-4); and at least one electrode (14/15) comprising an electrically conductive material, the at least one electrode (14/15) including an electrode electrically connected to the touch surface (121) of the conductive cap (12) via the dome switch (19) and the one or more conductive pads, the electrode mechanically coupled (22, 21) to the inner housing to rotate with the inner housing (see paragraphs 22-23, 32-33; Figs. 3-4). While disclosing all that is required as explained above, including a mounting structure (13), Ballan fails to specifically disclose the mounting structure as a base assembly as recited. Okuzumi discloses a knob device (20) capable of receiving both vertical depression an rotational input (see paragraphs 54-55; Figs. 1-5) wherein the knob includes a base assembly (36), the base assembly at a bottom of the knob on display device (15) (see paragraphs 56-57; Fig. 1-5). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to allow the usage of a base assembly similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi which allows for input similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi to be carried out in a system similar to that which is taught by Ballan to thereby provide an alternative housing portion for supporting and attaching the operation knob to the panel (see Okuzumi; paragraph 57). With reference to claim 2, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 1, wherein: Okuzumi further discloses a bottom side (38) of the base assembly (36) to mount to a touch screen of a touch screen device (16), so that the electrode is positioned in engagement proximity to the touch screen of the touch screen device through the base assembly (in teaching transmitting to the panel (15); see paragraphs 62, 65; Fig. 5). With reference to claim 3, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 2, wherein Okuzumi further discloses an adhesive applied to the bottom side of the base assembly to secure the knob on display device to the touch screen (15) (see paragraph 57; Fig. 5). With reference to claim 4, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 2, while Okuzumi discloses the electrodes are in engagement proximity to the touch screen display, there fails to be disclosure of the specific thickness of 0.5 millimeters or less of the base assembly as recited. However, the examiner finds that the thickness of the base assembly, as taught by Okuzumi, would inherently need to have a thickness which allows for transmission to the touch panel (15), such that the base assembly has a thickness through which the electrode is positioned in engagement proximity to the touch screen (see paragraphs 62, 65; Fig. 5). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to allow the thickness of the base to have a thickness to allow for transmission from the knob to the touch panel, similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi to thereby permit necessary transmission of input signals (Okuzumi; see paragraphs 62, 65). With reference to claim 5, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 1, wherein Okuzumi further discloses wherein the base assembly (34) includes: one or more side walls (40, 42) extending toward the conductive cap (24) (see paragraphs 56, 59; Fig. 5). With reference to claim 7, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 1, wherein Ballan further discloses that wherein the conductive cap (121), the dome switch (19), and the printed circuit including the conductive pads (14/15) are to rotate with the inner housing (11) responsive to a rotation of the conductive cap (121) (see paragraphs 28-29, 33-34; Figs. 3-5). With reference to claim 8, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 7, wherein Ballan further discloses that wherein a bearing (131) coupled to the inner housing (11); and the post coupled to the bearing to enable the inner housing and the electrode to rotate about the post (see paragraph 34; Figs. 3-4). With reference to claim 11, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose all that is required as explained above with reference to the knob on display device of claim 1, wherein Ballan further discloses wherein the printed circuit including the conductive pads comprises a printed circuit board (PCB) (see paragraph 37; Fig. 8). With reference to claim 13, Ballan discloses a knob on display system (see Fig. 1), comprising: a touch screen device comprising a touch sensor and a touch screen (see paragraphs 40-41, 45-46); and a knob on display device (1) comprising; a conductive cap (12/121), the conductive cap at a top of the knob on display device (1) (see paragraphs 31-32; Figs. 1-4); a dome switch (19), the dome switch under the conductive cap (121), the dome switch (19) electrically connected to a touch surface (121) of the conductive cap (12); (see paragraph 37; Figs. 7-8); a printed circuit including conductive pads (15), the conductive pads (15) including one or more dome switch pads (19), the dome switch (19) mounted on the one or more conductive pads (15) (see paragraphs 22, 37; Figs. 7-8); an inner housing (11), the inner housing between the conductive cap (121) and the mounting structure (13), the inner housing enabled to rotate about a post (hollow recess/16) within the mounting structure (13) (see paragraphs 25-26, 28; Figs. 3-4); and at least one electrode (14/15) comprising an electrically conductive material, the at least one electrode (14/15) including an electrode electrically connected to the touch surface (121) of the conductive cap (12) via the dome switch (19) and the one or more conductive pads, the electrode mechanically coupled (22, 21) to the inner housing to rotate with the inner housing (see paragraphs 22-23, 32-33; Figs. 3-4). While disclosing all that is required as explained above, including a mounting structure (13), Ballan fails to specifically disclose the mounting structure as a base assembly as recited. Okuzumi discloses a knob device (20) capable of receiving both vertical depression an rotational input (see paragraphs 54-55; Figs. 1-5) wherein the knob includes a base assembly (36), the base assembly at a bottom of the knob on display device (15) (see paragraphs 56-57; Fig. 1-5); and a bottom side (38) of the base assembly (36) [is] secured to the touch screen of the touch screen device, so that the electrode is positioned in engagement proximity to the touch screen of the touch screen device through the base assembly (in teaching transmitting to the panel (15); see paragraphs 62, 65; Fig. 5). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to allow the usage of a base assembly similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi which allows for input similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi to be carried out in a system similar to that which is taught by Ballan to thereby provide an alternative housing portion for supporting and attaching the operation knob to the panel (see Okuzumi; paragraph 57). With reference to claim 14, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the knob on display system of claim 13, wherein Okuzumi further discloses that the bottom side (38) of the base assembly (36) is secured to the touch screen (15) using an adhesive (see paragraphs 57, 89; Figs. 5, 9). With reference to claim 15, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the knob on display system of claim 14, wherein Okuzumi further discloses wherein the adhesive spans at least substantially an entire surface of the bottom side of the base assembly (in teaching the bottom/attachment surface is bonded with an adhesive or transparent adhesive; see paragraphs 57, 89; Figs. 5, 9). With reference to claim 16, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the knob on display system of claim 15, wherein Ballan further discloses that wherein the conductive cap (121), the dome switch (19), and the printed circuit including the conductive pads (14/15) are to rotate with the inner housing (11) responsive to a rotation of the conductive cap (121) (see paragraphs 28-29, 33-34; Figs. 3-5). With reference to claim 18, Ballan discloses a method of assembling a knob on display system (1), the method comprising: applying an adhesive to a bottom side of a base assembly of a knob on display device (see paragraphs 57, 89; Figs. 5, 9), the knob on display device (1) comprising a conductive cap (121), a dome switch (19), a printed circuit including conductive pads (14/15), and one or more electrodes (14/15) (see paragraphs 22-23, 37; Figs. 1, 5, 7-8), the conductive cap (121) at the top of the knob on display device (1), the dome switch (19) under the conductive cap and electrically connected to the touch surface of the conductive cap (see paragraph 37; Figs. 7-8) , the conductive pads including one or more dome switch pads to mount the dome switch thereto (19) (see paragraphs 22, 37; Figs. 7-8), the inner housing (11) between the conductive cap (121) and a mounting structure (13), the inner housing enabled to rotate about a post extending from the mounting structure (13) (see paragraphs 25-26, 28; Figs. 3-4), the one or more electrodes comprising an electrically conductive material, the one or more electrodes including an electrode electrically connected to the touch surface (121) of the conductive cap (12) via the dome switch (19) and the one or more dome switch pads, the one or more electrodes mechanically coupled (21, 22) to the inner housing to rotate with the inner housing (see paragraphs 22-23, 32-33; Figs. 3-4). While disclosing all that is required as explained above, including a mounting structure (13), Ballan fails to specifically disclose the mounting structure as a base assembly as recited. Okuzumi discloses a knob device (20) capable of receiving both vertical depression an rotational input (see paragraphs 54-55; Figs. 1-5) wherein the knob includes a base assembly (36), the base assembly at a bottom of the knob on display device (15) (see paragraphs 56-57; Fig. 1-5); and a bottom side (38) of the base assembly (36) [is] secured to the touch screen of the touch screen device, so that the electrode is positioned in engagement proximity to the touch screen of the touch screen device through the base assembly (in teaching transmitting to the panel (15); see paragraphs 62, 65; Fig. 5). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to allow the usage of a base assembly similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi which allows for input similar to that which is taught by Okuzumi to be carried out in a system similar to that which is taught by Ballan to thereby provide an alternative housing portion for supporting and attaching the operation knob to the panel (see Okuzumi; paragraph 57). With reference to claim 19, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the method of claim 18, wherein Okuzumi further discloses wherein applying the adhesive to the base assembly comprises applying the adhesive to substantially an entire surface of the bottom side of the base assembly (in teaching the bottom/attachment surface is bonded with an adhesive or transparent adhesive; see paragraphs 57, 89; Figs. 5, 9). With reference to claim 20, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the method of claim 19, wherein Okuzumi further discloses wherein the one or more electrodes are positioned at a fixed distance from the touch sensor of the touch screen device (see paragraph 61). Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ballan and Okuzumi as applied to claim 5 above, and further in view of Rao et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2015/0014141; hereinafter Rao). With reference to claim 6, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the knob on display device of claim 5, and while Okuzumi discloses the usage of a seal between the bottom surface and the conductive elements (see paragraph 80), there fails to be disclosure of a seal as recited. Rao discloses a button assembly having a button cap (410) and one or more side walls (440) comprising: one or more seals (470) between the one or more side walls (440) of the base assembly and the conductive cap (410). Therefore one of ordinary skill in the art would find it obvious to allow the usage of a seal provided between the base and the cap similar to that which is taught by Rao to be carried out on a knob on display device similar to that which is taught by Ballan and Okuzumi to thereby incorporate an environmental seal to thereby effectively prevent ingress of foreign matter (see Rao; paragraph 28). Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ballan and Okuzumi as applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Arnold et al. (US Patent No. 10,705,629; hereinafter Arnold). With reference to claim 9, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the knob on display device of claim 8, however fails to disclose the usage of detents of the base assembly as recited. Arnold discloses a knob (12) on display (14) comprising: detents (68) of the base assembly (12-H); and one or more detent actuators (64) of the inner housing (12-2), the one or more detent actuators to provide mechanical resistance to rotation of the inner housing about the post (see column 6, lines 29-47; Figs. 3-4). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to allow the usage of detents similar to that which is taught by Arnold to be carried out in a knob on display device similar to that which is taught by Ballan and Okuzumi to create localized resistance to rotation of the knob (see 5, lines 9-13). Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ballan and Okuzumi as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Gipson et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2020/0319727; hereinafter Gipson). With reference to claim 12, Ballan and Okuzumi disclose the knob on display device of claim 1, and while Ballan discloses the printed circuit includes conductive pads (151) (see paragraph 37), there however fail to be disclosure of a flexible printed circuit comprising a folded portion as recited. Gipson discloses a foldable flexible circuit board (see abstract; Figs. 3-6) wherein the printed circuit including the conductive pads comprises a flexible printed circuit, the flexible printed circuit (36) being folded to enable a portion thereof to lay flat relative to the touch sensor surface (54) (see paragraphs 35-37, 40-41; Figs. 3-6). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. PALEXZNYY et al. (US2010/0156823) discloses the usage of a dome switch positioned under a touch-sensitive display of an electronic device to receive input when an applied force to the touch-sensitive display is applied (see paragraphs 13-35; Figs. 1-6). AHN (US2005/0199477) discloses a scroll key having a selecting switch wherein a FPC assembled on the base such that a button and the FPC are fixed on the base board together (see paragraphs 28-40; Figs. 1-6). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALECIA DIANE ENGLISH whose telephone number is (571)270-1595. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 7:00am-3:00am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at 571-272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADE/Examiner, Art Unit 2625 /WILLIAM BODDIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12554357
TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12542107
SCAN CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12541258
SENSOR FOR DETECTING PEN SIGNAL TRANSMITTED FROM PEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12510994
RESOURCE ALLOCATION APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12498820
METHOD, SENSOR CONTROLLER, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
52%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 448 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month