Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/093,957

LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 28, 2025
Examiner
CHOW, VAN NGUYEN
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
696 granted / 838 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
863
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 838 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by IISAKA et al. (US 2011/0205439). The applied reference has a common Assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Regarding claims 1, 4-6 IISAKA et al. (US 2011/0205439), figs. 1-4, 7-12, discloses a liquid crystal display device comprising: a liquid crystal panel including panel pixels; and a display control circuit configured to control the liquid crystal panel, wherein video data includes pixel data corresponding to the panel pixels, and the pixel data designates gradation levels of the panel pixels, and the display control circuit is configured to: perform first correction on each piece of pixel data included in the video data, based on a gradation level of gradation data of a panel pixel around each piece of pixel data; detect a boundary at which a bright panel pixel, of which the gradation level designated by the pixel data subjected to the first correction is equal to or higher than a first threshold value, and a dark panel pixel, of which the gradation level is equal to or lower than a second threshold value, are adjacent to each other; when there is a first boundary at which the gradation level designated by the pixel data of the bright panel pixel being a bright panel pixel related to the detected boundary and subjected to the first correction is equal to or higher than a third threshold value, in a first bright panel pixel and a first dark panel pixel adjacent to each other via the first boundary, perform second correction for bringing the gradation level designated by the pixel data of the first bright panel pixel subjected to the first correction closer to the first threshold value and bringing the gradation level designated by the pixel data of the first dark panel pixel subjected to the first correction closer to the second threshold value; and supply a data signal corresponding to the corrected gradation level to the panel pixel. Regarding claim 2, IISAKA et al. (US 2011/0205439), figs. 1-4, 7-12, discloses the liquid crystal display device according to claim 1, wherein the display control circuit is configured to reduce a difference between gradation levels designated by pixel data of adjacent panel pixels for each piece of pixel data included in the video data, as the first correction (pars. 81, 89, 98, 105, 118, 119, 123). Regarding claim 3, IISAKA et al. (US 2011/0205439), figs. 1-4, 7-13, discloses the liquid crystal display device according to claim 1, wherein the boundary includes a second boundary in addition to the first boundary, and when dark panel pixels and bright panel pixels of which the number is larger than the number of the dark panel pixels are adjacent to each other at the first boundary, and dark panel pixels and bright panel pixels of which the number is smaller than the number of the dark panel pixels are adjacent to each other at the second boundary, the third threshold value is a value between a gradation level designated by pixel data of the bright panel pixels at the first boundary and a gradation level designated by pixel data of the bright panel pixels at the second boundary (pars. 93, 112, 115, 118, In the normally black mode, it may be considered that the threshold value Vth1 is an optical threshold voltage causing the relative transmittance of a liquid crystal element to be 10%, while the threshold value Vth2 is an optical saturation voltage causing the relative transmittance of a liquid crystal element to be 90%). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Van N Chow whose telephone number is (571)272-7590. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao Ke can be reached at 5712727776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VAN N CHOW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579954
LIQUID DISPLAY APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572314
MULTIPLE DISPLAYS IN A FULL-FACE RESPIRATORY PROTECTED FACEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567389
DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567388
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ACTIVE MATRIX DISPLAYS, CORRESPONDING CONTROLLER, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560820
OPTICAL IMAGE STABILIZATION UNIT CAPABLE OF BEING MINIATURIZED, LENS BARREL, AND OPTICAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 838 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month