Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/094,330

POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHODS THEREOF, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 28, 2025
Examiner
WARMFLASH, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
309 granted / 385 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
404
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 385 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 & 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shichino (US 10,840,747). Shichino discloses: In regard to claim 1: (Currently Amended) A power receiving apparatus (Figs. 3& 6 Item 111 and RX1) comprising: one or more memories storing instructions (Figs. 3 & 6 Item 308); and one or more processors executing the instructions (Figs. 3 &6 Item 301 i.e. processor/cpu or mpu) to: wirelessly receive power from a power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 3& 6 Items 101 and TX); and perform communication (Figs. 3 & 6 Items 303, 304 i.e. 1st and second communication units) with the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items 101, 204 and 206), wherein the communication comprising: transmitting identification information of the power receiving apparatus (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M604 and M605) to the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items 101, 204 and 206) at a first frequency (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M604 and M605 & 303 i.e. in -band communication used with 204), after transmission of the identification information (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M604 and M605), transmitting, at the first frequency, a request for communication at a second frequency higher than the first frequency (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M608, and M610 i.e. in -band communication requesting if TX 101 is BLE capable for communication) , and after transmission of the request, performing, at the second frequency, communication related to authentication for the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 3 & 6 Item M612, i.e. after determination that TX 101 is BLE capable for communication RX1 sends that ADV_IND through BLE standards) In regard to claim 2: (New) The power receiving apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the communication comprises receiving, from the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items 101, 204 and 206), information indicating whether authentication at the second frequency is available (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M611, followed by M612, i.e. determination that TX 101 is BLE capable for communication). In regard to claim 5: (New) A method executed by a power receiving apparatus (Figs. 3& 6 Item 111 and RX1), comprising: wirelessly receiving power from a power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 3& 6 Items 101 and TX); transmitting identification information of the power receiving apparatus (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M604 and M605) to the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items 101, 204 and 206) at a first frequency (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M604 and M605 & 303 i.e. in -band communication used with 204); after transmission of the identification information (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M604 and M605), transmitting, to the power transmitting apparatus at the first frequency, a request for communication at a second frequency higher than the first frequency (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M608, and M610 i.e. in -band communication requesting if TX 101 is BLE capable for communication); and after transmission of the request, performing, at the second frequency, communication related to authentication for the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 3 & 6 Item M612, i.e. after determination that TX 101 is BLE capable for communication RX1 sends that ADV_IND through BLE standards). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shichino (US 10,840,747) in view of Luke et al. (US 2013/0026973). In regard to claim 3: (New) Shichino discloses the power receiving apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the communication (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M601-M619) comprises transmitting, to the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items 101, and Tx1), a request regarding a transmitting apparatus ID packet (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items M610, and M611 i.e. ID Packet may be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as an electronic certificate). However, Shichino is vague in its disclosure of a request regarding an electronic certificate. Luke teaches, an electronic storage device that cannot accept a charge unless it receives an authentication from the charging device that authentication can include an electronic security certificate etc. (Par. [0077]). it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the known use of an electronic certificate for authentication as taught by Luke with the known power receiving apparatus control method as doing so would have yielded the obvious result of secured power transmission as taught by Luke (Par. [0077]). In regard to claim 4: (New) Shichino discloses the power receiving apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the communication (Figs. 3 & 6 Items M601-M619) comprises receiving , after transmitting the request regarding the ID packet (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Item M610, i.e. ID Packet may be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as an electronic certificate), information of the ID packet (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Item M611 i.e. ID Packet may be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as an electronic certificate) from the power transmitting apparatus (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items 101, and Tx1). However, Shichino is vague in its disclosure of receiving , after transmitting the request regarding the electronic certificate (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Item M610, i.e. ID Packet may be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as an electronic certificate), information of the electronic certificate (Figs. 2, 3 & 6 Items M610, and M611 i.e. ID Packet may be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as an electronic certificate). Luke teaches, an electronic storage device that cannot accept a charge unless it receives an authentication from the charging device that authentication can include an electronic security certificate etc. (Par. [0077]). it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the known use of an electronic certificate for authentication as taught by Luke with the known power receiving apparatus control method as doing so would have yielded the obvious result of secured power transmission as taught by Luke (Par. [0077]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. *Please See attached form PTO-892*. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J WARMFLASH whose telephone number is (571)270-1434. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-6PM EST M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menna Youssef can be reached at (571) 270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MW 2/18/2026 /Menatoallah Youssef/SPE, Art Unit 2849
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586710
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580429
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING POWER ALLOCATION AND OUT-BAND ACTIVATION BY USING SHORT-RANGE COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580422
INVERTER CIRCUIT AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573879
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565114
High-Voltage System for a Motor Vehicle, Comprising Passive Discharge Circuits for Y-Capacitors
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 385 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month