Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/094,711

ENCODING METHOD, DECODING METHOD, ENCODING APPARATUS, DECODING APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Mar 28, 2025
Priority
Sep 29, 2022 — CN 202211204121.9 +1 more
Examiner
PUENTE, EVA YI ZHENG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Douyin Vision Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
709 granted / 791 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 791 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 10, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Holliman et al (US 2004/0179608) (IDS). a) Regarding claim 10, Holliman et al disclose a decoding method (Fig. 5), comprising: obtaining a quantized signal from a received target bitstream (312; Pub [0037]; “randomly or pseudo-randomly varying quantization scale”; “304 and 308 include quantizers”), wherein the quantized signal comprises at least one of a first quantized signal or a second quantized signal, the first quantized signal is obtained by performing first quantization on a first multiple description signal, the second quantized signal is obtained by performing second quantization on a second multiple description signal, and the first multiple description signal and the second multiple description signal are obtained from a same signal (312; Pub [0037]; and obtaining a decoded signal based on at least one of the first quantized signal or the second quantized signal (316; Pub [0038]). b) Regarding claim 18, Holliman et al disclose an electronic device (Fig. 5), comprising: one or more processing apparatus; and a storage apparatus configured to store one or more programs, which when executed by the one or more processing apparatus (Pub [0033]), cause the one or more processing apparatus to implement a decoding method according to claim 10 (please see rejection for claim 10 above) or an encoding method, comprising: obtaining at least two multiple description signals according to a to-be-coded signal, the at least two multiple description signals comprising a first multiple description signal and a second multiple description signal; performing first quantization on the first multiple description signal to obtain a first candidate quantized signal set, and performing second quantization on the second multiple description signal to obtain a second candidate quantized signal set; obtaining a first quantized signal corresponding to the first multiple description signal and a second quantized signal corresponding to the second multiple description signal according to the first candidate quantized signal set and the second candidate quantized signal set; and encoding the first quantized signal and the second quantized signal to generate a target bitstream corresponding to the to-be-coded signal (underlined portion is not given patentable weight because “or” is an optional phrase). c) Regarding claim 19, Holliman et al disclose a non-transitory storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions, which when executed by a computer processor (Pub [0033]), perform a decoding method claim 10 (please see rejection for claim 10 above) or an encoding method, comprising: obtaining at least two multiple description signals according to a to-be-coded signal, the at least two multiple description signals comprising a first multiple description signal and a second multiple description signal; performing first quantization on the first multiple description signal to obtain a first candidate quantized signal set, and performing second quantization on the second multiple description signal to obtain a second candidate quantized signal set; obtaining a first quantized signal corresponding to the first multiple description signal and a second quantized signal corresponding to the second multiple description signal according to the first candidate quantized signal set and the second candidate quantized signal set; and encoding the first quantized signal and the second quantized signal to generate a target bitstream corresponding to the to-be-coded signal (underlined portion is not given patentable weight because “or” is an optional phrase). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 are allowed. Claims 11-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The present invention is directed to encoding and decoding in bitstreams forms of signals. The closest prior art, Holliman et al (US 2004/0179608) disclose coding utilize quantizer (Fig. 5). However, none of the prior art tech or suggest obtaining at least two multiple description signals according to a to-be-coded signal, the at least two multiple description signals comprising a first multiple description signal and a second multiple description signal; performing first quantization on the first multiple description signal to obtain a first candidate quantized signal set, and performing second quantization on the second multiple description signal to obtain a second candidate quantized signal set; obtaining a first quantized signal corresponding to the first multiple description signal and a second quantized signal corresponding to the second multiple description signal according to the first candidate quantized signal set and the second candidate quantized signal set; and encoding the first quantized signal and the second quantized signal to generate a target bitstream corresponding to the to-be-coded signal (emphasis added). Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2022/0020385 Beack et al disclose encoding, decoding and quantization. US 2011/0164672 Jiang et al disclose orthogonal multiple description coding. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Eva Y Puente whose telephone number is 571-272-3049. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 7:30 AM to 5:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh Fan can be reached on 571-272-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). July 15, 2026 /EVA Y PUENTE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704975
APPARATUS WITH SIGNAL QUALITY FEEDBACK
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706773
TRANSMITTING MODULE FOR A TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING DEVICE OF A SUBSCRIBER STATION OF A SERIAL BUS SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING A MESSAGE WITH DIFFERENTIAL SIGNALS IN A SERIAL BUS SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701037
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF COMMUNICATING AN EXTENDED RANGE (ER) PHYSICAL LAYER (PHY) PROTOCOL DATA UNIT (PPDU)
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12684586
Beam Management Procedures for Wireless Networks
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676779
BASE STATION DEVICE, RADIO COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 791 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month