Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/095,269

NANOMAGNETIC DATA STORAGE AND PROCESSING DEVICES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 31, 2025
Priority
Mar 28, 2023 — continuation of 12/302,586
Examiner
RICHARDSON, JANY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hanberry LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
842 granted / 927 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
936
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§102
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 927 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/31/25 is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 21 and 38 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-2 and 18-19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,302,586. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Instant Application Patent Number 12,302,586 21. A non-volatile data processing or storage device, comprising: a processing circuit having a substrate and a plurality of nanomagnetic triangles carried by the substrate and spaced apart from one another, the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles having shape-induced magnetic anisotropy and individually include: a geometric center; and first, second, and third vertices extending away from the geometric center along first, second, and third axes, respectively, the first axis having a magnetic direction from the geometric center that is different than magnetic directions of the second and third axes from the geometric center; and wherein one of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles has a first vertex magnetically coupled to a second vertex of another of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles such that a magnetic polarity change at the first vertex at the one of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles causes a responsive magnetic polarity change at the second vertex at the another of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles to generate an output of the processing circuit. 1. A non-volatile data processing or storage device, comprising: a processing circuit having a substrate and a plurality of nanomagnetic triangles carried by the substrate and spaced apart from one another, the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles having shape-induced magnetic anisotropy and individually include: a geometric center; and first, second, and third vertices extending away from the geometric center along first, second, and third axes, respectively, the first, second, and third axes being at least approximately equal spaced from one another radially; and wherein one of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles has a first vertex magnetically coupled to a second vertex of another of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles such that a magnetic polarity change at the first vertex at the one of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles causes a responsive magnetic polarity change at the second vertex at the another of the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles to generate an output of the processing circuit. 2. The non-volatile data processing or storage device of claim 1 wherein the plurality of nanomagnetic triangles individually further include: first, second, and third magnetic directions along each of the first, second, and third axes, respectively; and the first, second, third magnetic directions are related to one another as to avoid forming a magnetic monopole. 38. A non-volatile data processing or storage device, comprising: a processing circuit having a substrate and a plurality of nanomagnetic elements spaced apart from one another, the plurality of nanomagnetic elements having shape- induced magnetic anisotropy and individually include: a geometric center; and at least three axes extending away from the geometric center, one of the at least three axes having a magnetic direction that is different than magnetic directions of the other axes; and wherein one of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements is proximate and magnetically coupled to another of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements such that a magnetic polarity change at the one of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements causes a responsive magnetic polarity change at the another of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements to generate an output of the processing circuit. 18. A non-volatile data processing or storage device, comprising: a processing circuit having a substrate and a plurality of nanomagnetic elements carried by the substrate and spaced apart from one another, the plurality of nanomagnetic elements having shape-induced magnetic anisotropy and individually include: a geometric center; and at least three vertices extending away from the geometric center along at least three axes, respectively, the at least three axes being at least approximately equal spaced from one another radially; and wherein one of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements has a vertex magnetically coupled to another vertex of another of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements such that a magnetic polarity change at the vertex at the one of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements causes a responsive magnetic polarity change at the another vertex at the another of the plurality of nanomagnetic elements to generate an output of the processing circuit. 19. The non-volatile data processing or storage device of claim 18 wherein the plurality of nanomagnetic elements individually further include: at least three magnetic directions along each of the first, second, and third axes, respectively; and the at least three directions are related to one another as to avoid forming a magnetic monopole. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jany Richardson whose telephone number is (571)270-5074. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:30am to 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Taningco can be reached at (571) 272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANY RICHARDSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695455
Complementary 2(N)-Bit Redundancy for Single Event Upset Prevention
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690106
LOAD CONTROL DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A DRIVER FOR A LIGHTING LOAD
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682289
LIGHTING LOAD CLASSIFICATION AND DIMMER CONFIGURATION BASED THEREON
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658923
N:1 MUX DRIVER FOR ULTRA-HIGH SPEED TRANSMITTER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651824
SEALING UTILITY METER TRANSCEIVER ENCLOSURES
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+5.9%)
1y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 927 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month