Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/095,638

ULTRASOUND PROBE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 31, 2025
Priority
Apr 01, 2024 — JP 2024-059047
Examiner
IP, JASON M
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
394 granted / 710 resolved
-14.5% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
737
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/24/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 08/24/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive because the lines on the probe of Yamauchi indicate a symmetrical range of the ultrasound transducer and thus they do match at two opposing sides, or “both sides” as is being argued on page 7 of the Remarks. The scale lines of Yamauchi do “match both ends” because they extend symmetrically from the center mark “19”. The argument of inherency is not being made. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16 and 17 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim(s) 1-8, 10-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, it is unclear as to whether “the outside” and “an outside” are referring to the same thing, and, “the outside” lacks proper antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamauchi (JP 2010/119484 A, English translation, of record) in view of Solomon (US 2006/0058680, of record). Regarding claims 1-8, Yamauchi discloses an ultrasound probe comprising an ultrasound transducer that radiates an ultrasound wave, a case that accommodates the ultrasound transducer ([0025]: “ultrasound probe”), wherein the case includes one or more range markers that are provided at positions visible from an outside and that indicate a radiation range of the ultrasound wave ([0026]…[0028]); wherein a radiation surface of the ultrasound wave is elongated in an axial direction of the case, and the one or more range markers include a range marker that is disposed close to the radiation surface of the ultrasound wave, wherein the one or more range markers include a pair of range markers that are disposed on both sides in the lateral direction, respectively with the radiation surface of the ultrasound wave interposed therebetween, wherein at least one of the one or more range markers also function as a direction marker that has a surface parallel or orthogonal to a radiation surface of the ultrasound wave and that indicates a radiation direction of the ultrasound wave (Figs. 2 and 3 show a downward pointing arrow symbol which indicates the direction of the ultrasound wave), wherein at least one of the one or more range markers is a strip-shaped pattern that extends in the same range in an axial direction as the radiation range of the ultrasound wave (Figs. 2 and 3 shows pairs of range markers on both sides of a central marker, extending in a ‘strip-shape’). Yamauchi does not explicitly disclose that the case is substantially cylindrical and that the markers are arranged circumferentially around the case, visible from a 360-degree view, including a scale and color markings. However, Solomon teaches a substantially cylindrical laparoscopic ultrasound imaging probe for guiding a medical tool to an anatomical object of interest (Figs. 4 and 5A-5D) that comprises visible markers used for alignment to ultrasound transducers ([0020]). The addition of a generic scale and color selection would have been obvious modifications to enhance the visualization and understanding of Yamauchi’s markers. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the marker guide of Yamauchi to the cylindrical endoscopic device of Solomon, as to provide robust visual guidance to an in vivo ultrasound imaging device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jason Ip whose telephone number is (571) 270-5387. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9a-5p PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koharski can be reached on (571) 272-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON M IP/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3793
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Apr 30, 2026
Interview Requested
May 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 19, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Aug 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758174
ANALYSIS OF INTRACRANIAL BLOOD VESSELS
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758803
LIFTING BEAUTY DEVICE USING HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND
1y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758196
DYNAMIC RESOURCE RECONFIGURATION FOR PATIENT INTERFACE MODULE (PIM) IN INTRALUMINAL MEDICAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751772
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FAULT REACTION MECHANISMS FOR MEDICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751775
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE PLANNING AND CONTROL OF A SURGICAL TOOL
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+24.9%)
3y 10m (~2y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month