Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 19/096,407

THERMAL COOLING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 31, 2025
Examiner
RUPPERT, ERIC S
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Rivian Ip Holdings LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
474 granted / 789 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
837
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6, 9-11, 16, 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Teraki (JP2016125734A). Regarding claim 1/11, Teraki discloses a thermal cooling system (see Fig. 5/7), comprising: a cold plate (40 & 72) defining a channel (see channel defines by grooves G1 & G2); a pipe (pipe 10) extending through the channel; a layer of compressible thermal interface material (thermal interface grease 99) extending around a perimeter of the pipe; and a heat spreader (jacket 40) configured to absorb heat generated by one or more heat sources/a printed circuit board (heat generating component 20 & printed circuit board – Page 1), the heat spreader further configured to transfer at least a portion of the absorbed heat to the pipe via the layer of compressible TIM. Regarding claim 6/16, Teraki discloses the limitations of claim 1/11, and Teraki further discloses the heat spreader is thermally coupled to the one or more heat sources via one or more layers of TIM (Page 5). Regarding claims 9-10, 19-20, Teraki discloses the limitations of claim 1/11, and Teraki further discloses the heat spreader comprises a metal wherein the metal comprises aluminum (aluminum – Page 5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2/12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Teraki (JP2016125734A) in view of Jeong (WO2018066771A1). Regarding claim 2/12, Teraki teaches the limitations of claim 1/11, and Teraki does not teach wherein the heat spreader comprises: a first portion that is thermally coupled to a first printed circuit board assembly (PCBA); and a second portion that is thermally coupled to a second PCBA, the second portion being in contact with the first portion. Jeong teaches (see Fig. 10-17) the heat spreader comprises: a first portion (130) that is thermally coupled to a first printed circuit board assembly (300); and a second portion (140) that is thermally coupled to a second PCBA (300), the second portion being in contact with the first portion. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Teraki to include the two sided cold plate configuration of Jeong, in order to cool multiple PCBs (Page 7). Claim(s) 3-4, 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Teraki (JP2016125734A) in view of Lodahl (DE2556239A). Regarding claim 3/13, Teraki teaches the limitations of claim 1/11, and Teraki does not teach the heat spreader comprises: a first portion that is thermally coupled to a first PCBA; and a second portion that is thermally coupled to a second PCBA, the second portion positioned relative to the first portion such that a gap is defined between the first portion and the second portion. Lodahl teaches (see Fig. 1-3) the heat spreader (clamp parts 2 & 3) comprises: a first portion (2) that is thermally coupled to a first PCBA (electrical components 1); and a second portion (3) that is thermally coupled to a second PCBA (opposite electrical components), the second portion positioned relative to the first portion such that a gap is defined between the first portion and the second portion. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Teraki to include the two-sided cold plate for multiple PCBs in light of the teachings of Lodahl, in order to cool a plurality of components (Page 1). Regarding claim 4/14, Teraki teaches the limitations of claim 3/13, and Teraki as modified further teaches a portion of the layer of compressible TIM (99) is configured to flow into the gap when a force is applied (via 80) to the first portion of the heat spreader or the second portion of the heat spreader. Claim(s) 5, 7-8, 15, 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Teraki (JP2016125734A) in view of Lodahl (DE2556239A) and Demange (US20140233174A1). Regarding claim 5/15, Teraki teaches the limitations of claim 3/13, and Teraki does not teach a width of the gap is about 0.25 millimeters to about 1.25 millimeters. Demange teaches a width of the gap is about 0.25 millimeters to about 1.25 millimeters (see overlapping range of 0.1-0.5 mm - ¶[0092]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Teraki to include the gap dimension of Demange, in order to optimize contact and heat transfer (¶[0092]). Regarding claim 7-8/17-18, Teraki teaches the limitations of claim 6/16, and Teraki does not teach the layer of compressible TIM extending around the perimeter of the pipe is thicker than each of the one or more layers of TIM, herein a thickness of the layer of compressible TIM is about 0.2 millimeters to about 2 millimeters. Demange teaches the layer of compressible TIM extending around the perimeter of the pipe is thicker than each of the one or more layers of TIM, herein a thickness of the layer of compressible TIM is about 0.2 millimeters to about 2 millimeters (see layers 37 & 38 and see thickness ranges of ¶[0091-0092]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Teraki to include the gap dimension of Demange, in order to optimize contact and heat transfer (¶[0092]) and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.05(II). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC S RUPPERT whose telephone number is (571)272-9911. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC S RUPPERT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766910
HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS HAVING DEICING FEATURES
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766920
THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753975
CONTROLLABLE INJECTION FOR IMPLEMENTING DIFFERENT LOCAL REFRIGERANT DISTRIBUTION
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752598
THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751236
TEMPERATURE CONTROL SYSTEM WITH FLAMMABLE HEAT TRANSFER FLUID
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+23.9%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month