Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/097,387

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 01, 2025
Priority
Nov 18, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0155283 +1 more
Examiner
YODICHKAS, ANEETA
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
505 granted / 705 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
721
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
67.4%
+27.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 705 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 3-8, 12-17 and 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species B and Subspecies ii-v, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 5/1/2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1, 2, 9-11, 18 and 19 drawn to Species A and Subspecies i in the reply filed on 5/1/2026 is acknowledged. Although Applicant elected claims 8 and 17, they are dependent on withdrawn claims and therefore, are also considered withdrawn. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 9-11, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2018/0061298 A1 to Cho et al. As to claim 1, Cho discloses a display device comprising: a display divided into a plurality of display areas (Fig. 1, paragraph 0041, where display (100) has a plurality of display modules (110-n)); a plurality of drivers connected to the plurality of display areas (Fig. 2A-2B, paragraphs 0045-0050, where driving modules (120-n) are connected to display modules (110-n)); memory storing instructions and current information corresponding to each of the plurality of display areas is stored (Fig. 2A, paragraphs 0053-0068, where storage (130) is the memory); and one or more processors operatively connected to the display, the plurality of drivers, and the memory (Fig. 2A, paragraphs 0047-0068, processor (140), display (110), drivers (120), storage (130)), wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the display device to: input an image into a trained Artificial Intelligence (AI) model, and based on an output of the trained AI model indicating the image is a target for dynamic peaking application, identify whether a pixel value of the image is equal to or less than a threshold value (Fig. 9, paragraphs 0105-0113, where the target peak luminance level is determined in step (S920)), and based on the pixel value being equal to or less than the threshold value: identify a plurality of peak luminance levels of the plurality of display areas, and control the plurality of drivers, based on the current information of the plurality of display areas stored in the memory, such that the plurality of display areas have the plurality of peak luminance levels (Fig. 9, paragraphs 0105-0113, where the peak luminance levels are determined and the display modules are controlled in steps (S920, S930)). As to claim 2, Cho discloses the display device, wherein each of the plurality of display areas comprises at least one of: a pixel area unit corresponding to one driver IC, or a display module unit corresponding to a plurality of driver ICs (Fig. 2A and 2B, paragraph 0052, where the driving module is an IC). As to claim 9, Cho discloses the display device, wherein the current information comprises current control information according to luminance of a plurality of subpixels of one display area of the plurality of display areas (Fig. 2A and 2B, paragraphs 0055-0058, where the current control information is according to the luminance of each subpixel), and wherein a subpixel of the plurality of subpixels comprises Red (R) LED, Green (G) LED, and Blue (B) LED subpixels (Fig. 2A, paragraph 0046, where the subpixels are red, green and blue). As to claims 10, 11 and 18, Cho discloses limitations similar to claims 1, 2 and 9, respectively. As to claim 19, Cho discloses limitations similar to claim 1. In addition, Cho discloses a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing computer instructions recorded thereon that, when executed by one or more processors of a display device divided into a plurality of display areas, causes the display device to: input an image (Fig. 2A, paragraphs 0053-0054 and 0117-0118, where storage (130) is the non-transitory computer-readable recording medium). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANEETA YODICHKAS whose telephone number is (571)272-9773. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANEETA YODICHKAS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2627 /ANEETA YODICHKAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681564
SAFETY BOUNDARY GENERATION
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682823
DISPLAY DRIVING DEVICE FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670866
GATE DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658135
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658101
DISPLAY DEVICE, AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND A METHOD FOR DRIVING THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+24.9%)
2y 7m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 705 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month