Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/097,514

AIR FOIL BEARING MICRO LATTICE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Apr 01, 2025
Priority
Apr 04, 2024 — IN 202411027931
Examiner
JOHNSON, PHILLIP A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
General Electric Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1100 granted / 1350 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1362
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1350 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1, 5 and 14 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, lines 2 – 3, “the thrust disc and the rotor shaft to rotate” should read - - wherein the thrust disc and the rotor shaft rotate - -. Claim 1, line 7, “engaging” should read - - engagement - -. Claim 5, lines 3 – 4, “the second micro lattice structure between the second thrust pad and the second side of the thrust disc” should read - - wherein the second micro lattice structure is between the second thrust pad and the second side of the thrust disc - -. Claim 14, lines 4 – 5, “the second micro lattice structure between the second thrust pad and the second side of the thrust disc” should read - - wherein the second micro lattice structure is between the second thrust pad and the second side of the thrust disc - -. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Yoshino et al. USPGPUB 20160356310. Claim 20, Yoshino discloses an air foil bearing assembly (foil bearing unit 10)(Fig. 2)([0108], l. 1) comprising: a rotor shaft (common shaft 6)([0108], l. 2)) to rotate within a housing ([0108], ll. 8 – 12: “[t]he foil bearing unit 10 is fixed to a housing of the gas turbine, and is configured to support, in the radial direction and the thrust directions, the shaft 6 rotatable to one side in a circumferential direction”); a thrust disc (disc-like flange portion 22)(Fig. 3)([0109], ll. 2 – 3) fixed to the rotor shaft; a first thrust pad (first thrust foil bearing 40)([0108], l. 6) fixed to the housing and aligned with a first side of the thrust disc, the thrust disc to move towards the first thrust pad as the thrust disc rotates; a second thrust pad (second thrust foil bearing 50)([0108], ll. 6 – 7) fixed to the housing and aligned with a second side of the thrust disc, the thrust disc to move towards the second thrust pad as the thrust disc rotates; and an aerophilic material coating between at least one of (1) the thrust disc and the first thrust pad and (2) the thrust disc and the second thrust pad, the aerophilic material coating to mitigate movement of the thrust disc along a centerline axis of the rotor shaft ([0128]: “[d]uring the low speed rotation immediately before the stop or immediately after the actuation of the shaft 6, the bearing surfaces of the foils (in particular, a bearing surface of each of the foils 32 of the radial foil bearing 30) and the rotary member 20 come into sliding contact with each other. Thus, low-friction coating such as a DLC film, a titanium aluminum nitride film, a tungsten disulfide film, and a molybdenum disulfide film may be formed on one or both of the bearing surface of each of the foils and the rotary member 20. Further, during the rotation of the shaft 6, due to the slight sliding between each of the foils 32, 42, and 52 and each of the foil holders 31, 41, and 51, the vibration of the shaft 6 can be suppressed. In order to adjust a frictional force that is generated by the slight sliding, the low-friction coating as described above may be formed on one or both of each of the foils 32, 42, and 52 and each of the foil holders 31, 41, and 51”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 19 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record, including Yoshino et al. USPGPUB 20160356310, taken as a whole neither teaches nor makes obvious the claimed combination of a contact-free wheel bearing pre-seal as set forth in claim(s) 1. Yoshino teaches an air foil bearing assembly 10 comprising a thrust disc 22 coupled to a rotor shaft 6, and a thrust pad 40 aligned with a first side thrust disc, wherein the thrust disc moves towards the thrust pad as the thrust disc rotates. Yoshino further teaches the use of a coating to mitigate engagement between the thrust disc and the thrust pad. In contrast, the claimed invention requires a micro lattice structure between the thrust disc and the thrust pad, wherein the micro lattice structure mitigates thrust pad engagement with the thrust disc. Further, Yoshino contains no teaching, motivation or suggestion that would lead a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the air foil bearing to incorporate a micro lattice structure between the thrust disc and the thrust pad, wherein the micro lattice structure mitigates the thrust pad engagement with the thrust disc. Therefore, the claimed combination represents a non-obvious advance over the prior art. The prior art of record, including Yoshino et al. USPGPUB 20160356310, taken as a whole neither teaches nor makes obvious the claimed combination of a contact-free wheel bearing pre-seal as set forth in claim(s) 11. Yoshino teaches an air foil bearing assembly 10 comprising a thrust disc 22 coupled to a rotor shaft 6, and a first thrust pad 40 and a second 50 thrust pad fixed to a housing and aligned, respectively, with the first and second sides to the thrust disc. Yoshino further teaches the use of coating to mitigate engagement between the thrust disc and the first and second thrust pads. In contrast, the claimed invention requires a micro lattice structure between the thrust disc and at least one of the first thrust pad and the second thrust pad, wherein the micro lattice structure mitigates movement of the thrust disc along an axis of the rotor shaft. Further, Yoshino contains no teaching, motivation or suggestion that would lead a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the air foil bearing to incorporate a micro lattice structure between the thrust disc and at least one of the first thrust pad and the second thrust pad, wherein the micro lattice structure mitigates movement of the thrust disc along an axis of the rotor shaft. Therefore, the claimed combination represents a non-obvious advance over the prior art. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILLIP A JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5216. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Olszewski can be reached at 571-272-2706. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILLIP A JOHNSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698798
STRUT BEARING ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLE
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698799
BEARING DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL INSULATION, NOTABLY FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR OR MACHINE
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692898
DOUBLE ROW ANGULAR CONTACT BALL BEARING
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692846
GRAVITY BATTERY MOTOR & ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687197
DOUBLE-ROW ROLLING BEARING
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1350 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month