Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/098,890

DATA PROCESSING FOR HAPTIC MEDIA

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 02, 2025
Priority
Jan 09, 2023 — CN 202310027189.2 +1 more
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, AFROZA Y
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
616 granted / 844 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
856
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 844 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu et al. (US 20170171135). As to claim 1, Wu discloses a method of data processing, the method comprising: obtaining a media file of haptic media (Figs. 1A-1B), the media file comprising a first portion and a second portion, wherein the first portion includes a bitstream of media data of the haptic media and the second portion includes relationship indication information indicating an association relationship between the haptic media (Figs. 1A(100): haptic effect inst) and at least a non-haptic media (Fig. 1A(100): public message, [0021] – [0022], [0030] – [0031], [0038]: message coordination module 148 can consult a user profile to determine user preferences related to which haptic message should be provided); and decoding the bitstream according to the relationship indication information to obtain the media data for presenting the haptic media (Figs. 1A-1B, [0024] – [0025]: haptic output, [0031], [0038], [0039]: receives a different haptic message along with the common post message; “haptic message” can be interpreted as “haptic media” and “common post message” and “non-haptic media”, [0046]). As to claim 18, it is the apparatus that performs the operation of claim 1. Please see claim 1 for detail analysis. As to claim 20, it is the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for performing the functions of claim 1. Please see claim 1 for detail analysis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-17 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claims, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AFROZA Y CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)270-1543. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nitin Patel can be reached at (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AFROZA CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 02, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743628
ENHANCEMENT OF GENERATIVE IMAGE MODELS BASED ON GAZE
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737051
MAP DISPLAY ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731960
TEMPERATURE-BASED DYNAMIC LASER TUNING TO PROMOTE DISPLAY UNIFORMITY
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730538
EXTERNALLY HANGED FLOATING TOUCH APPARATUS AND FLOATING TOUCH DISPLAY APPARATUS THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724458
APPARATUS OF MANUFACTURING SUPPORT PANEL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (-6.4%)
2y 9m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 844 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month