Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/099,436

A Food Box

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 28, 2025
Priority
Jul 28, 2022 — SG 10202250621F +1 more
Examiner
DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tria Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
1126 granted / 1633 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
1698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1633 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the handle" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Smith (AU 2001283329 B2). Regarding claims 1, 3, and 8, Smith discloses a container comprising a base (12) and a perimeter wall extending from the base, the perimeter wall comprises a front wall portion (22) and a rear wall (14) portion opposite thereof, a left wall (18) portion and a right wall (18; see Fig. 1) portion opposite thereof, wherein the left wall portion and the right wall portion are disposed between the front wall portion and the rear wall portion, a cover adapted to cover the tray, the cover comprising a proximal cover panel (34) pivotally connected (via 36) to the front wall portion and a distal cover panel (38) pivotally connected (via 40) to the rear wall portion wherein the proximal cover panel and the distal cover panel are rotatable to cover the tray in a covering position (see Fig. 2), wherein the proximal cover panel comprises a left proximal cover edge and a right proximal cover edge opposite thereof and a securing mechanism (48; see Fig. 1) disposed on the proximal cover panel and adapted to secure the proximal cover panel to the tray, wherein in the covering position, the proximal cover panel is secured to the tray by the securing mechanism and retains the distal cover panel in the covering position, wherein the securing mechanism comprises a left securing mechanism and a right securing mechanism, wherein the left securing mechanism is adapted to secure the proximal cover panel to the left wall portion (via locking slot 46) and the right securing mechanism is adapted to secure the proximal cover panel to the right wall portion, wherein the left securing mechanism comprises a left securing portion extending from the left proximal cover edge and a left engaging portion disposed on the left wall portion and adapted to engage the left securing portion, the right securing mechanism comprises a right securing portion extending from the right proximal cover edge and a right engaging portion disposed on the right wall portion and adapted to engage the right securing portion and wherein the distal cover panel is without a securing mechanism (see Fig. 1; Examiner notes that distal cover panel outer edge is without a securing mechanism). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 4-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE whose telephone number is (571)270-1982. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHAN J NEWHOUSE can be reached at (571)272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679595
Container With Denesting Features
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679590
Container With Divider
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673811
A Thermally Insulative Liner for Use in Packaging
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673799
PACKAGING BOX FOR REDUCE VOLUME AND SAFE TRANSPORTATION FOR STORAGE CERAMIC
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668408
Carton For Containers
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 6m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month