Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/099,468

EXHAUST SYSTEM FOR A TURBINE ENGINE, COMPRISING A HEAT EXCHANGER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 28, 2025
Examiner
OLYNICK, DAVID
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
SAFRAN
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
177 granted / 226 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
246
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 226 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Amendment Amendment to specification filed 4 June 2025 has been entered. Claim Objections Claims 1, 7 and 8 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 in line 4 includes “the flow.” It is believed to be in error for - - a flow. - - Claim 7 in line 2 includes “out heat exchanges.” It is believed to be in error for - - out the heat exchanges. - - Claim 7 in line 3 includes “a heat transfer.” It is believed to be in error for - - the heat transfer. - - Claim 8 in line 3 includes “a heat transfer.” It is believed to be in error for - - the heat transfer. - - Claim 8 in line 3 includes “the inlet.” It is believed to be in error for - - an inlet. - - Claim 8 in lines 4 -5 includes “the outlet.” It is believed to be in error for - - an outlet. - - Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-7, 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fonseca (US 2017/0292412). Regarding claim 1, Fonseca teaches an exhaust system 10 for a turbine engine 14 comprising a nozzle 12 at least partly delimiting a gas exhaust path, characterised in that it comprises a heat exchanger 52 comprising at least one distributor 70, at least one manifold 72 and ducts configured for the flow of a heat-transfer fluid 24 in said ducts 54 between the distributor and the manifold (¶28, a plurality of passageways 54 are created through which a fluid 24 can flow), the heat exchanger being configured to carry out heat exchanges between the gas exhaust path and the ducts (¶28), and the heat exchanger being positioned on the nozzle (¶28, heat exchanger jackets are sandwiched between an inner skin 48 and outer skin 48 of exhaust nozzle 12). Fonesca doesn’t teach the ducts being partially formed from a surface of the nozzle. Fonesca teaches the heat exchanger 52 is formed from two sheets of welded together between the inner skin 48 and outer skin 50 of the exhaust nozzle (¶28). The heat exchangers can both be formed from Inconel (¶28, ¶51). The inner and outer skin of the nozzle can be made of Inconel (¶42). It is noted that making a part integral, i.e., integrating the skin of the nozzle with the heat exchanger, as it is disclosed and claimed in the instant application, was an obvious extension of prior art teachings, In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 968, 144 USPQ 347, 349 (CCPA 1965) (MPEP 2144.04 V B.). Further, when the Inconel heat exchanger is mounted to the Inconel skin of the nozzle, the heat exchanger becomes part of the exhaust nozzle and thus, the ducts are partially formed from a surface of the nozzle as claimed. Regarding claim 2, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches the nozzle comprises an annular outer part and a central body (Fig. 2), the heat exchanger being positioned on the outer part (Figs. 5, 7) and/or on the central body (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 3, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches the outer part of the nozzle comprises one or more annular sectors (Fig. 7 shows two annular sectors. Regarding claim 4, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches the ducts are positioned outside or inside the gas exhaust path (Ducts are positioned outside gas path in Fig. 7, i.e., sandwiched within the nozzle interior.). Regarding claim 5, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches the ducts extend longitudinally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the exhaust system, or transversely to the longitudinal axis (Ducts 52 in Fig. 5 satisfy one of these conditions). Regarding claim 6, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches made of a material comprising a titanium alloy and/or a nickel alloy (Inconel is a nickel alloy). Regarding claim 7, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches the heat exchanger is configured to carry out heat exchanges between exhaust gases leaving through the gas exhaust path and a heat-transfer fluid flowing in the ducts, said heat-transfer fluid comprising air and/or water vapour and/or water and/or fuel and/or oil and/or supercritical CO2 and/or liquid or gaseous hydrogen (steam generator is taught ¶13. Other fluids may be used but water vapour is not excluded). Regarding claim 10, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches a thermal management system for heating air or fuel in a turbine engine (¶66, energy from the system is used in compressors to heat air). Regarding claim 11, Fonseca teaches the invention as claimed and discussed above and Fonseca further teaches an aircraft comprising the exhaust system of claim 1 (¶3, system is for aircraft). Claims 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Muldoon (US 2022/0381185) in view of Fonseca (US 2017/0292412). Regarding claim 8, Muldoon teaches a turbine engine (200, Fig. 2) comprising a compressor 206 and a combustion chamber 210, characterised in that it comprises an exhaust system 232, the heat exchanger being configured to heat fuel at the inlet of the combustion chamber (Fuel is received from tank 224, which passes through heat exchanger 232 and heated, is expanded in a turbine 234 and enters inlet of combustor. Thus, the fuel is heated in the inlet of the combustor). Muldoon doesn’t teach the exhaust system of claim 1. As discussed above for claim 1, Fonseca teaches the exhaust system of claim 1. In both Muldoon and Fonseca, the exhaust heat exchanger is located on the exhaust nozzle and used to heat a fluid and expand it through a turbine to generate energy. Muldoon doesn’t teach details of the exhaust system heat exchanger. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the turbine engine of Muldoon have the exhaust system of claim 1, as taught by Fonseca, in order to allow the hydrogen to be expanded and generate energy using the heat from the exhaust nozzle. Regarding claim 9, Muldoon in view of Fonseca teaches the invention as discussed above and Muldoon further teaches an aircraft with the engine (Fig. 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID OLYNICK whose telephone number is (571)272-2355. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30 am-5 pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phuttiwat Wongwian can be reached at (571) 270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID P. OLYNICK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590561
COMBUSTOR WITH LEAN OPENINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571326
MOBILE ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560324
COMBUSTION SECTION WITH A PRIMARY COMBUSTOR AND A SET OF SECONDARY COMBUSTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553609
INTERCOOLED COMBUSTOR NOZZLE GUIDE VANE AND SECONDARY AIR CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12523200
MICRO SCALABLE THRUSTERS FOR ADAPTIVE MISSION PROFILES IN SPACE - USTAMPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 226 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month