Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/101,040

AUTOMATED POWDER FILLING FOR AN AUTOMATED PRODUCTION LINE FOR AMMUNITION

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 04, 2025
Examiner
BERGIN, JAMES S
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
SwissP Defence AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
792 granted / 999 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1022
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “43” has been used to designate two different parts in Fig. 2. The specification uses the reference numeral 43 for the “Metering Perforated Plate”. The reference numeral 7 has been used for the “doser”. Fig. 1 should also be reviewed to confirm that 43 actually points to the metering perforated plate and not the doser 7. All the drawings should be reviewed to ensure that the correct reference numerals point to the appropriate component of the device. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, lines 7-8, the limitation, “a dispensing device configured to be moved along an image of the path of the ammunition cases”, is not understood. The meaning of, “image of the path of the ammunition cases”, is indefinite an cannot be readily interpreted. In claim 2, line 3, the term, “image of the path of the ammunition cases” is indefinite for the same reason as discussed above for claim 1. In claim 3, line 10, the term, “image of the path of the ammunition cases” is indefinite for the same reason as discussed above for claim 1. In claim 6, line 6, “image of the path” is indefinite for the same reason as discussed above for claim 1. In claim 14, line 4, the term, “image of the path of the ammunition cases” is indefinite for the same reason as discussed above for claim 1. In claim 4, line 7, “the doser”, lacks a proper antecedent basis. In claim 7, the last line thereof, the “dosing depressions”, lacks a proper antecedent basis. In claim 12, lines 4-5, “a parameter of the propellant powder”, is indefinite because the scope of the limitation cannot readily be determined. In claim 14, lines 5-6, “the automated production line”, lacks a proper antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2 and 13-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KR 101930504 Bl (HANWHA CORP [KR]). The following rejection is made in as much as the claims can be reasonably interpreted in light of the 35 U.S.C 112(b) rejection presented above. Regarding independent claim 1, Hanwha Corp disclose a device for the automated filling of at least two ammunition casings (1) with propellant powder for an automated production line for ammunition, comprising a metering housing (60) to which the at least two ammunition casings (1) can be docked in such a manner that the at least two ammunition casings (1) are arranged along a path, and a dispensing device (10) which can be moved along a path that matches the path of the ammunition casings (1) in order to dispense propellant powder into the metering housing (60), wherein a guide (30) is provided for guiding the dispensing device (10) along the path that matches the path of the ammunition casings (1). (see Figs 1-3; paragraphs [0040]-[0107]). Regarding claims 2 and 13-18, are disclosed by Hanwha Corp (see Figs. 1-3; paragraphs [0071], [0098] and [0107]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See the attached PTO-FORM 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES S BERGIN whose telephone number is (571)272-6872. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES S BERGIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 04, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601573
METHOD AND TOOL FOR PRODUCING A BASE PIECE OF A MULTI-PART CARTRIDGE CASE, BASE PIECE AND CARTRIDGE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601575
RANGE EXTENSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584719
IMPROVED END CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584718
EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC FIREWORK IGNITER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571620
AMMUNITION PRESS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month