Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/101,629

FLOATING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Priority
Aug 17, 2022 — EU 22190715.7 +1 more
Examiner
OLSON, LARS A
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Single Buoy Moorings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1585 granted / 1934 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1969
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1934 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The present application is a 371 of PCT/EP2023/072170 filed on August 10, 2023. A preliminary amendment was filed by the applicant on February 7, 2025. Drawings The drawings were received on February 6, 2025. These drawings are acceptable. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on February 6, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shell Internationale Research (WO 2011/101461 A1). Shell Internationale Research discloses a hydrocarbon processing vessel, as shown in Figures 1-8, which is comprised of a marine vessel, defined as Part #100, with a hull, defined as Part #2, that is configured to support a weight, a pair of sidewalls, defined as Parts #4 and 6, having a length that extends in a longitudinal direction, a base or bottom structure, defined as Part #8, that extends between said sidewalls, a main or upper deck, defined as Part #10, having a breadth, a processing deck, defined as Part #50, that is disposed over said main or upper deck, a plurality of hydrocarbon processing units, each defined as Part #52, that are mounted on and supported by said processing deck, as shown in Figure 2, side spaces that are bounded by said base or bottom structure, said main or upper deck, said pair of sidewalls, and a pair of longitudinal bulkheads, defined as Parts #40 and 42, that are disposed at a distance from said pair of sidewalls, as shown in Figures 2 and 5, at least one hydrocarbon storage tank, defined as Parts #20 and 22, that is disposed between said base or bottom structure, said main or upper deck, and said pair of longitudinal sidewalls, as shown in Figure 5, and a centerline bulkhead that is formed by a second pair of longitudinal bulkheads, defined as Parts #26 and 28. Between one and eight of said hydrocarbon storage tanks of substantially the same size extend in a transverse direction between said pair of longitudinal bulkheads and said centerline bulkhead, as shown in Figure 5. Said hydrocarbon storage tanks are disposed between front and aft transverse bulkheads, each defined as Part #32, as shown in Figure 5. Said hydrocarbon processing units are disposed on said processing deck, which is supported by said main or upper deck, as shown in Figure 2. Said marine vessel is further comprised of a turret, defined as Part #60, that is connected to a plurality of hydrocarbon risers which extend to a subsea well, as described in lines 9-18 of page 12. Pipes, which are not shown, inherently connect said hydrocarbon risers to said hydrocarbon processing units in order to allow hydrocarbons to be transported from said subsea well to said hydrocarbon processing units. Said side spaces are further comprised of seawater ballast tanks, as described in lines 19-23 of page 9, which in order to function inherently require the use of pumps that are configured to fill or empty said ballast tanks. Shell Internationale Research, as set forth above, discloses all of the features claimed except for the use of a marine vessel having a specific weight in tons, and a specific distance between a pair of sidewalls and a pair of longitudinal bulkheads. The use of a marine vessel having a weight of a specific tonnage would be considered by one of ordinary skill in the art to be an obvious design choice based upon the required size of said marine vessel in order to carry and support a desired volume and weight of cargo. The use of a marine vessel having a specific spacing distance between a pair of sidewalls and a pair of longitudinal bulkheads would also be considered by one of ordinary skill in the art to be an obvious design choice based upon the required spacing to hold and support a desired volume of cargo or ballast. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to one of ordinary skill in the art, to utilize a marine vessel having a specific weight in tons, and having a specific distance between a pair of sidewalls and a pair of longitudinal bulkheads, in combination with the hydrocarbon processing vessel as disclosed by Shell Internationale Research for the purpose of providing a marine vessel of sufficient size and weight to carry and support a desired volume and weight of cargo or ballast. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sikora et al. (US 5,582,124) discloses a framing system for marine vessels. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LARS A OLSON whose telephone number is (571) 272-6685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARC JIMENEZ can be reached at 571-272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. October 14, 2026 /LARS A OLSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615B
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767276
OVER-THE-DECK SUPPORT FRAME ASSEMBLY, BIMINI AND WATERCRAFT HAVING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767290
MULTI-PURPOSE RESCUE ROD FOR TOXIC GAS POISONING OR DROWNING AND ELECTRIC SHOCK RESCUE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759672
DEVICE FOR TOWING A WATERCRAFT
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759686
TILLERS FOR MARINE DRIVES HAVING YAW ADJUSTMENT DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759680
FLOATING MARINE PLATFORM AND THE MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
1y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1934 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month