Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/101,767

CONTROL DEVICE FOR A LIFTING PLATFORM WITH INTEGRATED ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Examiner
TRAN, DIEM M
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Maha Maschinenbau Haldenwang GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
516 granted / 649 resolved
+27.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
674
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§102
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 649 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is the First Office Action on the merits of Application No. 19/101767, filed on 02/06/2025. Claims 1-13 are still pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 9, the phrase "in particular" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-7, 9-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent No. 11,383,964 to Jaipaul et al (henceforth referred to as Jaipaul). Regarding claims 1-2, 4-7, Jaipaul discloses a control device for a lifting platform (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 22), in particular for a mobile lifting platform for vehicles, comprising: control electronics (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 74) which are configured to control a drive (i.e. Fig. 4, ref. 62) of the lifting platform, an energy store (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 42) which is configured to provide energy for the drive of the lifting platform, and a housing (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 38) in which the control electronics and the energy store are arranged. Which comprises a plate (i.e. Mark up of Fig. 5b) which is arranged in the housing, wherein the control electronics are arranged on a first side (i.e. Fig. 5b, lower side) of the plate and the energy store is arranged on a second side (i.e. Fig. 5b, upper side) opposite the first side of the plate. Wherein the energy store bears against the second side of the plate (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 42 bears against the upper side of the plate). Wherein the housing is of two part design, and a first housing part (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 40) on the first side and a second housing part (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 38) on the second side of the plate are connected thereto. Which comprises a control panel (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 56) which is arranged on the first housing part. Wherein the energy storage has a plurality of energy storage cells (i.e. Fig. 5b, there are two ref. 42). Regarding claims 9-12, Jaipaul discloses a lifting platform (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 22), in particular a mobile lifting platform for vehicles, comprising: a base device (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 30), by means of which the lifting platform can be set up on a floor; a lifting column (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 36) which is connected to the base device; a lifting device (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 34) which is arranged on the lifting column and can be moved along the lifting column; a drive (i.e. Fig. 4, ref. 62) which is configured to drive the lifting device; and a control device, comprising: control electronics (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 74) which are configured to control a drive (i.e. Fig. 4, ref. 62) of the lifting platform, an energy storage (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 42) which is configured to provide energy for the drive of the lifting platform, and a housing (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 38) in which the control electronics and the energy store are arranged. Wherein the control device is arranged in a region of an upper end of the lifting column (i.e. Fig. 3b shows ref. 42 and 24 in a relative upper region of ref. 22). Which comprises at least one carrier (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 32), which is connected to the base device (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 30) and/or to the lifting column (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 36) and which received the control device (i.e. Fig. 2, indicated at ref. 40). Wherein a first housing part (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 38) of the control device is arranged facing away from the lifting column, and a second housing part (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 40) of the control device is arranged facing the lifting column. Regarding claim 13, Jaipaul discloses system comprising: one or more lifting platforms (i.e. Fig. 1, ref. 22) each of the one or more lifting platforms comprising: a base device (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 30) by means of which the lifting platform can be set up on a floor; a lifting column (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 36) which is connected to the base device; a lifting device (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 34) which is arranged on the lifting column and can be moved along the lifting column; a drive (i.e. Fig. 4, ref. 62) which is configured to drive the lifting device; and a control device, comprising: control electronics (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 74) which are configured to control a drive (i.e. Fig. 4, ref. 62) of the lifting platform, an energy storage (i.e. Fig. 5b, ref. 42) which is configured to provide energy for the drive of the lifting platform, and a housing (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 38) in which the control electronics and the energy store are arranged. PNG media_image1.png 712 550 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent No. 11,383,964 to Jaipaul et al. Regarding claim 3, Jaipaul does not specifically teach the housing is made of plastic nor teach the plate is made of metal. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to use plastic for the removable casing to facilitate taking the cover off and on and metal for the plate to support the weight of the energy store without deforming since it has been held that a mere reversal of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent No. 11,383,964 to Jaipaul et al in view of US Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0119455 to Jaipaul et al (henceforth referred to as Jaipaul ‘455). Regarding claim 8, Jaipaul does not specifically teach the energy storage is a lithium ion accumulator. However, lithium ion accumulators are known in the art and not novel to the invention. For example, Jaipaul ‘455 teaches a similar lifting platform (i.e. Fig. 3b, ref. 22) comprising a similar control device (i.e. Fig. 3b, ref. 24, 42) and further teaches the energy stores (i.e. Fig. 3b, ref. 42) can comprise one or more cells comprising lithium ion battery cells (i.e. claim 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use commercially available lithium ion batteries as taught in Jaipaul ‘455 in the lift platform as taught in Jaipaul to reduce price and ease replacement and there would have been reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent No. 11,731,867 to Smith et al teaches a control device for a platform lift; US Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0356051 to Elliott et al teaches a control device for a platform lift; WO 2020/009571 to De Jong teaches a control device for a platform lift. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIEM M TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7825. The examiner can normally be reached M 9-5, W-F 10-2. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Mansen can be reached at 571-272-6608. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIEM M TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600607
VERTICAL HANDLING PLATFORM FOR MOTOR VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589975
A METHOD AND AN ARRANGEMENT FOR ALIGNING ELEVATOR GUIDE RAILS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583717
LIFT APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583713
EXTENDABLE EVACUATION BRIDGE FOR AN ELEVATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565410
SIDE SHIFT CONTROL DEVICE FOR FORKLIFT TRUCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 649 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month