Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 19/102,320

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR POWER CONTROL FOR SIDELINK POSITIONING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 07, 2025
Priority
Aug 08, 2022 — provisional 63/396,056 +2 more
Examiner
HUANG, WEN WU
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
604 granted / 827 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
887
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
67.8%
+27.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 827 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over YANG et al. (US 2025/0024381 A1; hereinafter “YANG”) in view of WANG et al. (US 2025/0056589 A1; hereinafter “WANG”). Regarding claim 1, YANG teaches a method for a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) (YANG discloses a wireless communication method performed by a first wireless communication device, i.e., a UE (YANG [0004], [0111]; FIG. 2, UE 204 with transceiver module 230 and processor module 236, [0042])), the method comprising: receiving, from a peer WTRU, a sidelink reference signal received power (SL-RSRP) measurement report based on the peer WTRU's measurement of a previous transmission to the peer WTRU of at least one of a sidelink positioning reference signal (SL-PRS) or sidelink (SL) data (YANG discloses that a target UE receiving the SL-PRS measures its RSRP and reports it to the transmitting UE, which uses it to compute the sidelink pathloss; [0085]–[0086]; claim 11; YANG also discloses the target UE measuring a PSSCH DM-RS and reporting that RSRP to the transmitting UE; [0059]–[0060]). determining to transmit a new SL-PRS at a transmission power for transmitting the new SL-PRS (YANG determines P_SL-PRS(i) subject to P_MAX,CBR_SL-PRS; [0054], [0062]; and expressly distinguishes an SL-PRS CBR measured over the SL-PRS resource pool, [0079], from a CBR measured over the general resource pool, [0089]. YANG further maintains two alternative SL-PRS power formulations: one built on SL-PRS-specific parameters, [0062], [0071], [0084]; and one built as an offset to PSSCH power control, [0088]); and transmitting to the peer WTRU, the new SL-PRS using the selected first transmission power or the selected second transmission power (YANG [0004], [0054], [0076]; FIG. 3, 302/304). YANG is silent to teaching that wherein a transmission power based on a type of resource pool used for transmitting the new SL-PRS, wherein a first transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a shared pool and a second transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a dedicated pool. In the same field of endeavor, WANG teaches a method wherein a transmission power based on a type of resource pool used for transmitting the new SL-PRS, wherein a first transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a shared pool and a second transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a dedicated pool (WANG determines power information for target signal transmission on a first resource pool, the target signal being an SL positioning reference signal, [0006], [0031]–[0032]; classifies that pool by type: a pool usable for the SL reference signal, [0040], or shared among a plurality of terminals, [0044], — versus a dedicated pool for the SL reference signal as indicated by first indication information, [0041], or a pool that cannot be used for data or PSSCH,[0043]; WANG conditions the power determination on which type applies; [0057], [0066]–[0069]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to condition YANG's SL-PRS power determination — and the corresponding target-UE measurement — on the type of resource pool, as taught by WANG. WANG states the purpose is to ensure reliability of SL transmission (WANG [0045]); YANG identifies improved positioning accuracy and reduced positioning latency as the objects of proper SL-PRS power control (YANG [0095]). One of ordinary skill would recognize that a dedicated pool carrying no data or PSSCH (WANG [0043]) presents materially different occupancy from a pool shared with other terminals or traffic (WANG [0040], [0044]), such that a single power determination across both would waste power in the former and cause excess interference in the latter. Regarding claim 2, the combination of YANG and WANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first transmission power is based on the received SL-RSRP measurement report for previous transmission of SL data (YANG derives PL_SL from the RSRP of a PSSCH DM-RS reported by the target UE,[0059], [0092], which feeds the PSSCH-offset SL-PRS power formulation, [0088]; WANG likewise identifies the PSSCH DMRS as an SL path-loss reference signal (WANG [0096]; [0084]–[0086])) Regarding claim 3, the combination of YANG and WANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the second transmission power is based on the SL-RSRP measurement report for previous transmission of the SL (YANG derives PL_SL^SL-PRS from the SL-PRS RSRP reported by the target UE (YANG [0085]–[0086]; claim 11), used in the PRS-specific formulation (YANG [0071], [0084]; WANG identifies a second SL reference signal for positioning as an SL path-loss reference signal (WANG [0098]; claim 14)). Regarding claim 4, the combination of YANG and WANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the shared pool comprises time and frequency resources shared for SL-PRS transmission and SL data transmission (WANG's pool usable for the SL reference signal (WANG [0040]) and shared by a plurality of terminals (WANG [0044]), read against WANG's pool that cannot be used for data or PSSCH (WANG [0043]) — WANG claim 1 recites both types together, so the pool of [0040] necessarily may carry both. See also YANG [0089] (CBR over sub-channels of the general SL pool)). Regarding claim 5, the combination of YANG and WANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the dedicated pool comprises time and frequency resources only for SL-PRS transmission (WANG [0041], [0043]; claims 1–2. See also YANG [0079] (SL-PRS sub-channels within the SL-PRS resource pool)). Regarding claim 6, the combination of YANG and WANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein prior to receiving the SL-RSRP measurement report, the method further comprises: receiving configuration information indicating the resource pool to transmit the new SL-PRS as the shared pool or the dedicated pool (WANG's dedicated pool is indicated by first indication information (WANG [0041]; claim 2), within configuration information for the SL reference signal (WANG [0053]–[0057]). YANG configures its power parameters by higher layer, RRC, or network (YANG [0057], [0096], [0102])). Regarding claim 8, YANG teaches a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) comprising: a processor (YANG, [0198]); and a transceiver communicatively coupled to the processor (YANG, [0198]); wherein the processor and the transceiver are configured to: receive, from a peer WTRU, a sidelink reference signal received power (SL-RSRP) measurement report based on the peer WTRU's measurement of a previous transmission to the peer WTRU of at least one of a sidelink positioning reference signal (SL-PRS) or sidelink (SL) data (YANG discloses that a target UE receiving the SL-PRS measures its RSRP and reports it to the transmitting UE, which uses it to compute the sidelink pathloss; [0085]–[0086]; claim 11; YANG also discloses the target UE measuring a PSSCH DM-RS and reporting that RSRP to the transmitting UE; [0059]–[0060]). determine to transmit a new SL-PRS at a transmission power for transmitting the new SL-PRS (YANG determines P_SL-PRS(i) subject to P_MAX,CBR_SL-PRS; [0054], [0062]; and expressly distinguishes an SL-PRS CBR measured over the SL-PRS resource pool, [0079], from a CBR measured over the general resource pool, [0089]. YANG further maintains two alternative SL-PRS power formulations: one built on SL-PRS-specific parameters, [0062], [0071], [0084]; and one built as an offset to PSSCH power control, [0088]); and transmit to the peer WTRU, the new SL-PRS using the selected first transmission power or the selected second transmission power (YANG [0004], [0054], [0076]; FIG. 3, 302/304). YANG is silent to teaching that wherein a transmission power based on a type of resource pool used for transmitting the new SL-PRS, wherein a first transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a shared pool and a second transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a dedicated pool. In the same field of endeavor, WANG teaches a device wherein a transmission power based on a type of resource pool used for transmitting the new SL-PRS, wherein a first transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a shared pool and a second transmission power is selected if the type of resource pool is a dedicated pool (WANG determines power information for target signal transmission on a first resource pool, the target signal being an SL positioning reference signal, [0006], [0031]–[0032]; classifies that pool by type: a pool usable for the SL reference signal, [0040], or shared among a plurality of terminals, [0044], — versus a dedicated pool for the SL reference signal as indicated by first indication information, [0041], or a pool that cannot be used for data or PSSCH,[0043]; WANG conditions the power determination on which type applies; [0057], [0066]–[0069]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to condition YANG's SL-PRS power determination — and the corresponding target-UE measurement — on the type of resource pool, as taught by WANG. WANG states the purpose is to ensure reliability of SL transmission (WANG [0045]); YANG identifies improved positioning accuracy and reduced positioning latency as the objects of proper SL-PRS power control (YANG [0095]). One of ordinary skill would recognize that a dedicated pool carrying no data or PSSCH (WANG [0043]) presents materially different occupancy from a pool shared with other terminals or traffic (WANG [0040], [0044]), such that a single power determination across both would waste power in the former and cause excess interference in the latter. Regarding claims 9-13, the dependent claims are interpreted and rejected for the same reasons as set forth above in claims 2-6, respectively. Claim(s) 15-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WANG in view of SHIN (US 2024/0007968 A1). Regarding claim 15, WANG teaches a method for a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) (WANG discloses a power determining method performed by a terminal (FIGS. 1–2; ¶¶ [0029], [0031]), including the terminal that receives the SL path loss reference signal (¶ [0092])), the method comprising: receiving, from a peer WTRU, at least one of a first sidelink positioning reference signal (SL-PRS) or a sidelink (SL) data transmission (WANG discloses that the first SL reference signal is a reference signal for positioning and may be an SL PRS (¶ [0032]), and that the terminal receives first SL reference signals sent by other terminals (¶¶ [0106], [0179]). WANG further discloses that the received SL path loss reference signal is a DMRS corresponding to the PSSCH — i.e., an SL data transmission — or a second SL reference signal for positioning (¶¶ [0095]–[0098]; claim 14)); measuring the SL-RSRP of the received first SL-PRS or the SL data (WANG discloses measuring the RSRP of the received SL path loss reference signal, which is an L1 RSRP or a higher-layer-filtered first RSRP (¶¶ [0083]–[0086]; claim 13), and that the RSRP of a positioning second SL reference signal is the sum of power on the REs transmitting it (¶¶ [0098], [0171])); and sending, to the peer WTRU, a SL-RSRP measurement report indicating the measured SL-RSRP (WANG discloses that values B and C — respectively the filtered RSRP and the L1 RSRP of the received SL path loss reference signal — are sent to the first terminal by the terminal receiving that signal (¶¶ [0087]–[0092]), and that a sending terminal adjusts transmit power based on received power fed back by a receiving terminal (¶ [0034])). WANG is silent to teaching that comprising determining to measure a sidelink reference signal received power (SL-RSRP) of the received first SL-PRS or the SL data transmission based on a type of resource pool used for transmission being a shared SL data and SL-PRS resource pool or a dedicated SL-PRS resource pool; and measuring the SL-RSRP based on the type of resource pool used. In the same field of endeavor, SHIN teaches a method comprising determining to measure a sidelink reference signal received power (SL-RSRP) of the received first SL-PRS or the SL data transmission based on a type of resource pool used for transmission being a shared SL data and SL-PRS resource pool or a dedicated SL-PRS resource pool (SHIN teaches transmission of the positioning signal either in the resource region carrying the PSSCH or in a dedicated resource region separated from it (¶¶ [0141], [0177]–[0178]; FIGS. 10–11), and selects the received-power measurement accordingly: where the SL-PRS is TDMed with data in the PSSCH region, the measurement is taken over the PSCCH/PSSCH symbols (¶¶ [0221], [0258]–[0259]); where the SL-PRS occupies a dedicated region, the measurement is taken over the symbols carrying the SL-PRS (¶¶ [0226], [0264]–[0265]; claims 1, 4)); and measuring the SL-RSRP based on the type of resource pool used (SHIN ¶¶ [0221], [0226], [0258]–[0259], [0264]–[0265]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have selected the signal on which WANG's SL-RSRP is measured according to the resource pool type, as taught by SHIN. SHIN teaches that a dedicated pool may carry the SL-PRS alone with no PSSCH present (¶ [0196]), so a PSSCH-based measurement is unavailable there, whereas in the shared pool the SL-PRS is TDMed with the PSSCH (¶ [0314]). WANG itself lists the PSSCH DMRS among the candidate SL path loss reference signals (¶ [0096]) while contemplating a pool in which no PSSCH may be transmitted (¶ [0043]), so a rule for selecting among the candidates is required. The combination applies a known technique to a known device ready for improvement to yield the predictable result of a valid path loss estimate and correspondingly accurate SL-PRS transmit power, the stated aim of both references (WANG ¶ [0045]; SHIN ¶ [0165]). KSR, 550 U.S. 398; MPEP 2143(I)(C), (D). Regarding claim 16, the combination of WANG and SHIN teaches the method of claim 15, further comprising: receiving, from the peer WTRU, a second SL-PRS at a transmission power based on the SL-RSRP measurement report (WANG discloses that the first transmit power of the first SL reference signal is calculated from the path loss of the SL path loss reference signal (¶¶ [0078]–[0081]; claim 11), that the path loss is derived from the reported RSRP values B or C (¶¶ [0087]–[0092]), that the target power is min(P<sub>CMAX</sub>, P<sub>MAX,CBR</sub>, P<sub>sl-prs,SL</sub>(i)) (¶ [0066]), and that the terminal then sends the first SL reference signals to the other terminals based on that target power (¶¶ [0103]–[0104]); SHIN teaches the same feedback loop cumulatively: the pair UE reports the SL-RSRP to the Tx UE, which computes SL pathloss and uses it to set the SL-PRS transmit power (¶¶ [0254], [0279], [0287]), with a further SL-PRS transmitted in the same pair (¶ [0113])). Regarding claims 17 and 18, the dependent claims are interpreted and rejected for the same reasons as set forth above in claims 4 and 5, with respect to WANG’s teaching. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20260046786 A1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WEN WU HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-7852. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WEN W HUANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743593
COEXISTENCE OF WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES ON AN ANTENNA
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743126
WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING ANTENNA
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744413
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND CONTROL PROGRAM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727947
SYSTEMS AND METHODS UTILIZING MACHINE-LEARNING FOR IN VIVO NAVIGATION
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12720282
Systems and Methods for Coherent Radiation From a Swarm of Wirelessly Powered and Synchronized Sensor Nodes
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 1m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 827 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month