Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/102,510

METHOD FOR ISOMERIZING OLEFINS

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 10, 2025
Priority
Aug 16, 2022 — EU 22190500.3 +1 more
Examiner
VASISTH, VISHAL V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Evonik Oxeno GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
992 granted / 1372 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1372 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is indefinite because the claim describes “bringing into contact a hydrocarbon mixture comprising at least the reactant olefins to be isomerized and product olefins . . . .”. However, the product olefins are never brought into contact with the olefins according to the specification as originally filed. 1-butene is in contact with the catalyst to produce 2-butene, the two compounds are never mixed or reacted. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kramer et al., US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0290940 (hereinafter referred to as Kramer) in view of Gartner et al., EP Publication No. EP3822244 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Gartner). Regarding claims 1-14, Kramer discloses an isomerization method and a composition comprising: a) subjecting a feedstream comprising C4 to C24 alpha olefins into a reactor comprising a catalyst and converting the feed to an effluent comprising internal olefins (see Abstract and Para. [0020]); and b) The catalyst consists of silica and alumina with a silica/alumina molar ratio of less than or equal to about 100 (see Abstract and Para. [0009]). Kramer does not explicitly disclose the heterogenous catalyst being an X-ray amorphous catalyst as recited in claim 1. Gartner discloses a method for isomerization of olefins (see Title) comprising isomerizing C4 to C9 olefins using Aerosil® MOX170, approx. 1% by weight of aluminum oxide, BET surface area between 140 and 200 m2/g, and amorphous were introduced into a tubular reactor with a diameter of 0.6 mm. The reactor was charged with crude butane with the following composition; 1-butene, cis-2-butene, trans-2-butene, isobutene, n-butane, and iso-butane wherein the isomerization takes place at a temperature between 20°C and 450 °C, the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) can be from 2,000 to 8,000 h-1. The selectivity of the isomerization according to the invention with respect to the product olefin is preferably greater than 80%, more preferably greater than 82% and particularly preferably greater than 85% and includes aggregated primary particles, wherein the hydrocarbon mixture can be subjected to a separation stage in which 1-butene and 2-butene are separated from each other by distillation under pressure. (Para. [0010]-[0015] and [0030]-[0034]). Gartner further discloses that for shaping, 1 to 20 wt.% of the silicon-aluminum mixed oxide composition is first mixed with one of the aforementioned binders and additionally with temporary additives, such as water, aqueous solutions, water substitutes such as glycols or polyglycols, and optionally further additives, such as fixatives, for example cellulose ethers, and/or plasticizing agents, for example polysaccharides, and/or pressing aids, for example non-ionic wax dispersions (Para. [0020]-[0021]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the catalyst of Gartner in the process of Kramer in order to enhance the product selectivity in isomerization processes (Para. [0007] of Gartner). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL V VASISTH whose telephone number is (571)270-3716. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-4:30 and 7:00-10:00p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Prem Singh can be reached at 5712726381. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VISHAL V VASISTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703834
ANTI-STICTION IONIC LUBRICANTS IN MEMS DEVICES
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686833
REFRIGERATOR OIL COMPOSITION AND REFRIGERATOR MIXTURE COMPOSITION
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686655
Method and System for Light Olefin Generation with High Yields and Selectivity
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679736
Methods, Systems and Apparatus for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678906
MACHINE TOOL SYSTEM, AND HYDRAULIC LIQUID AND PROCESSING LIQUID FOR MACHINE TOOLS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.7%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month