Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/102,573

PREVENTION OF ERROR PROPAGATION FOR SIDELINK POSITIONING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 10, 2025
Priority
Aug 08, 2022 — provisional 63/395,966 +3 more
Examiner
HAMMONDS, MARCUS C
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
370 granted / 516 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
540
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 516 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the applicants' communication filed on February 10, 2025. In virtue of this communication, claims 19-32 are currently presented in the instant application. Drawings The drawings submitted on February 10, 2025 have been reviewed and accepted by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, and 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Pub No.: US-20260025837-A1 (herein “Li”). Claims 19 and 26 Consider claim 19, Li teaches A first wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprising a processor: the processor configured to: send, to a second WTRU, a request that includes a request for a sidelink positioning reference signal (SL-PRS) sequence identifier (ID) of the second WTRU and a position of the second WTRU (see Li Fig. 5, [0065], [0138]-[0160] note SL-PRS-IUC request including parameters including UE ID information and/or distance/location information and SL-PRS sequence ID); and receive, from the second WTRU, a response indicating the SL-PRS sequence ID of the second WTRU, a periodicity of SL-PRS transmission, ID information of the second WTRU, the position of the second WTRU, and an uncertainty of the position of the second WTRU (see Li Fig. 5, [0065], [0206]-[0236], [0350], [0374] note SL-PRS-IUC report including the UE ID information and/or distance/location information, PRS sequence ID, SL-PRS configuration information including periodicity, and latitude/longitude/altitude together with uncertainty shape and quality of each measurement). Claim(s) 26 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 19. Claims 20 and 27 Consider claim 20, Li teaches wherein a second WTRU uncertainty metric is based on the uncertainty of the position of the second WTRU (see Li [0350] note (1) latitude/longitude/altitude together with uncertainty shape or (2) quality of each measurement). Claim(s) 27 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 20. Claims 23 and 30 Consider claim 23, Li teaches wherein the processor is further configured to determine the second WTRU uncertainty metric based on an uncertainty range associated with the position of the second WTRU (see Li [0350] note (1) latitude/longitude/altitude together with uncertainty shape). Claim(s) 30 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 23. Claims 24 and 31 Consider claim 24, wherein the processor is further configured to receive, from the second WTRU, assistance information associated with the second WTRU, the assistance information comprising one or more of an absolute position of the second WTRU or an uncertainty metric associated with an absolute position of the second WTRU (see Li [0350] note (1) latitude/longitude/altitude together with uncertainty shape). Claim(s) 31 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 24. Claims 25 and 32 Consider claim 25, Li teaches wherein the first WTRU comprises a target WTRU, and wherein the second WTRU comprises an anchor WTRU (see Li Fig. 5, [0065], note UE-B is the requester, target, and UE-A is the responding UE, anchor). Claim(s) 32 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21, 22, 28, and 29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li, and further in view of Pub No.: US-20240323910-A1 (herein “Pan”). Claims 21 and 28 Consider claim 21, Li fails to teach wherein the processor is further configured to transmit, to a network node, an indication of the position of the second WTRU and the second WTRU uncertainty metric. Pan teaches providing the measurement report and/or location estimate communication to the network with location with positioning accuracy (see Pan [0042], [0065], [0067], [0156]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Li to include the recited teaching of Pan. Such a modification would improve Li by improving communications for D2D (see Pan [0002]). Claim(s) 28 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 21. Claims 22 and 29 Consider claim 22, Li as modified by Pan teach wherein the processor is further configured to determine the second WTRU uncertainty metric based on the periodicity of SL-PRS transmission (see Pan [0134] note SL assistance data i.e. PRS periodicity). Claim(s) 29 is/are rejected for at least the same reason(s) set forth in claim 22. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCUS C HAMMONDS whose telephone number is (571)270-3193. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALISON T. SLATER can be reached at (571)270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARCUS HAMMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739605
Autonomous Vehicle Communication Gateway Architecture
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739770
NETWORK SELECTION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739738
NETWORK SELECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732903
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK SLICE AND SUBSCRIBER PROFILE MANAGEMENT FOR FLIGHT PATHS ACROSS MULTIPLE NETWORKS
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726944
PAGING METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.9%)
3y 3m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 516 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month